The Commish
Footballguy
I'm sure @Weebs210 just missed this...bump. I have been unsuccessful in finding the details.By the way....do we have a list of the terms China's agreed to and what we've agreed to?
I'm sure @Weebs210 just missed this...bump. I have been unsuccessful in finding the details.By the way....do we have a list of the terms China's agreed to and what we've agreed to?
Nice!This will be good for US chip stocks in the near future, China seems hell bent on being self independent in this industry.
China cuts tax rate on semiconductors
Might want to change your thread title to reflect the current idiocy going on. He's pulling a Lucy on another ally. Can't see how this will end badlySouth Korea has agreed to a new trade deal with the USA:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/28/us-south-korea-trade-deal-is-3-deals-in-1-says-us-trade-rep-lighthizer.html
President Trump and his supporters will claim that this is the result of the threatened tariffs (Trump notably did NOT place tariffs immediately on South Korea, but threatened to if a deal was not achieved) and will no doubt cite this as proof that what Trump is doing is working. And perhaps they have a point. Personally, I hate the idea of threatening other nations in order to win concessions from them; it can never be good in the long run. But perhaps in this case it was effective.
So if this deal is as good as it appears to be based on the summary, congratulations to President Trump and his administration.
And these are in effect today....it's not what they are talking about doing. They've done it. Maybe they should write a book about deal making...seem to be several steps ahead of the master negotiator.Details of the new Chinese tariffs:
http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/02/news/economy/china-us-tariffs-trade/index.html
His style of "negotiation" is to threaten. That works when you have the big stack at the table and noobs all around. Not so much when the stacks are relatively even and all the guys at the table have pegged you as the noob.I'm not well educated when it comes to global economics and as such I'm trying to become more informed as I age.
I'm trying to understand DJT's tactics here. I don't believe that he actually thinks things through. I guarantee China did. It took them less than two weeks to consider and implement tariffs. I don't believe they'd do that unless they think the pros outweigh the cons of a trade war with the U.S.
Trump's idea of negotiation is to bluster first. He is a bully, and when dealing with contractors and sub-contractors - and generally dealing from a position of strength - that tactic can work - when you do not have long-term relationships with your negotiating adversary.I'm not well educated when it comes to global economics and as such I'm trying to become more informed as I age.
I'm trying to understand DJT's tactics here. I don't believe that he actually thinks things through. I guarantee China did. It took them less than two weeks to consider and implement tariffs. I don't believe they'd do that unless they think the pros outweigh the cons of a trade war with the U.S.
this doesn't make sense to me. Aren't tariffs based on country of origin, not ownership?Please note that China already owns the largest pork producer in the US (Smithfield Foods), so all that pork will be going to China without the tariff while ever non-Smithfield Food product will be slapped with the tariff. Yes, they are two steps ahead of us here.
China will carve out an exception for their own company.this doesn't make sense to me. Aren't tariffs based on country of origin, not ownership?
oh, ok. Their tariffs, their rules. Got it.China will carve out an exception for their own company.
exactlyoh, ok. Their tariffs, their rules. Got it.China will carve out an exception for their own company.
Or they just route it through another country since Smithfield has operations all over the world. Plus even if they do pay the tariff, it's not like the money isn't coming back to themselves and then they can buy up more independant farms here when they can't compete. The pork tariff is BFD for pork producers.China will carve out an exception for their own company.
There are too busy researching whether China's tariffs on "pork" will affect their legislative agenda...Does our Congress not feel the need to reign him in at all? I find it incredible that they cannot see the dangers of destroying long-established relationships with our allys.
They are all (with a few exceptions) petrified to speak out. They think the Trump/Bannon/Hannity machine will bulldoze them out of a job. It's going to take one well-respected Republican to just say F-it and not care about reelection or having Fox News hate him to stand up and say 'Enough is enough!' The only ones with the balls to challenge him on anything are guys like McCain or Flake who are not seeking reelection. The lack of backbone and moral compass is simply disgusting. Paul Ryan is the one who should be most ashamed of himself. He had some convictions of right and wrong during the primaries. As soon as Trump won, he became the biggest wimp on the planet. They all just stand back shaking in their shoes.Does our Congress not feel the need to reign him in at all? I find it incredible that they cannot see the dangers of destroying long-established relationships with our allys.
Oh, I'm sure that that do.Does our Congress not feel the need to reign him in at all? I find it incredible that they cannot see the dangers of destroying long-established relationships with our allys.
You mean running the country like a real estate business doesn’t work?His style of "negotiation" is to threaten. That works when you have the big stack at the table and noobs all around. Not so much when the stacks are relatively even and all the guys at the table have pegged you as the noob.
Am I being naïve to think that perhaps, one day soon, there will be some back room discussions amongst Republican congressmen and senators where they agree to start putting the country ahead political election nonsense? If they banded together, they would sway the right as well as Fox News (which, let's face it, tells the right what to think and feel about everything) to joinj with them to save the country and the Republican party. I mean, despite appearances, I have to think that these guys actually have some compassion and feelings and morals. Right?Oh, I'm sure that that do.
The problem is that they are much more worried about getting re-elected than they are anything else.
Is Elaine Chao (otherwise known as McConnell's wife) still the Secretary of Transportation in this scenario?Am I being naïve to think that perhaps, one day soon, there will be some back room discussions amongst Republican congressmen and senators where they agree to start putting the country ahead political election nonsense? If they banded together, they would sway the right as well as Fox News (which, let's face it, tells the right what to think and feel about everything) to joinj with them to save the country and the Republican party.
Unfortunately, I do think you are giving them WAY too much credit.Am I being naïve to think that perhaps, one day soon, there will be some back room discussions amongst Republican congressmen and senators where they agree to start putting the country ahead political election nonsense? If they banded together, they would sway the right as well as Fox News (which, let's face it, tells the right what to think and feel about everything) to joinj with them to save the country and the Republican party. I mean, despite appearances, I have to think that these guys actually have some compassion and feelings and morals. Right?
It’s a sad fact that a 17 year old kid like David Hogg seems to have more guts and courage than nearly all of the Republican politicians, combined.They are all (with a few exceptions) petrified to speak out. They think the Trump/Bannon/Hannity machine will bulldoze them out of a job. It's going to take one well-respected Republican to just say F-it and not care about reelection or having Fox News hate him to stand up and say 'Enough is enough!' The only ones with the balls to challenge him on anything are guys like McCain or Flake who are not seeking reelection. The lack of backbone and moral compass is simply disgusting. Paul Ryan is the one who should be most ashamed of himself. He had some convictions of right and wrong during the primaries. As soon as Trump won, he became the biggest wimp on the planet. They all just stand back shaking in their shoes.
It is also the human condition that the young tend towards idealism while those somewhat older bend towards pragmatism.It’s a sad fact that a 17 year old kid like David Hogg seems to have more guts and courage than nearly all of the Republican politicians, combined.
It's about the job for our politicians. Don't bite the hand that feeds you and you'll be fine. Hogg isn't beholden to anyone. We've already seen a shift in behavior from the adults when they aren't trying to keep a job. Of course, this makes it no less gutless, but I'm trying to be fair by pointing out that Hogg really has nothing to lose. Republican politicians have already lost their souls so now they are trying to do damage control and not lose their jobs.timschochet said:It’s a sad fact that a 17 year old kid like David Hogg seems to have more guts and courage than nearly all of the Republican politicians, combined.
These are excellent points.Ditkaless Wonders said:It is also the human condition that the young tend towards idealism while those somewhat older bend towards pragmatism.
One of the things I like very much about The Prophet by Kahlil Gibran is that the elders of a community are asking after the metaphysical and philosophical wisdom of one of their youths who is about to enter manhood. They do this to be reminded of the truths of youth, their own truths from their own time, perhaps partially forgotten through the trials of living. Some of that same spirit is captured in Cat Stevens' song Father and Son were both perspectives presented, that of age and experience and that of youth and passion are equally true and valid and are not necessarily counter-posed, though they seem so at first.
That was supposed to be the great thing about Trump. And every once in a while, in casual sit-down settings, we get to see Trump's actual thoughts when he's dealing face to face with people. His comments about DACA and being a bill of love are a prime example. And his talk about raising the age of purchasing a gun up to 21. But then he crumbles to pressure and it's like those discussions never took place. Trump is actually more beholden than most Presidents, as it turns out. He's beholden to groups like the NRA. He's beholden to every Fox News commentator. And he's beholden to that rabid, red hat wearing bunch of yahoos who attend his rallies.It's about the job for our politicians. Don't bite the hand that feeds you and you'll be fine. Hogg isn't beholden to anyone. We've already seen a shift in behavior from the adults when they aren't trying to keep a job. Of course, this makes it no less gutless, but I'm trying to be fair by pointing out that Hogg really has nothing to lose. Republican politicians have already lost their souls so now they are trying to do damage control and not lose their jobs.
And thus my use of terms which were less than absolute like "tend" of 'bend". Certainly, and delightfully, there are exceptions to the generalizations.These are excellent points.
But political courage need not rely on youth or idealism. The most comparable political figure in our modern history to Donald Trump, in terms of indecency, was Joseph McCarthy. Then, as now, most Republicans were petrified of him. But a few spoke out: Margaret Chase Smith of Maine was the loudest. Edgar R Murrow, a conservative Republican (despite the fact that he is today regarded as a liberal icon) challenged McCarthy on TV. Joseph Welch, another conservative, ultimately destroyed McCarthy.
These men (and woman) were not young. They were not idealists. But they did have the strength of their convictions. And they were brave.
There are a few prominent conservatives now who are speaking out: George Will, Steve Schmidt, a few others. But they’re not loud enough.
It seems Trump's motto is to boast loudly while carrying a small stick
Pleased to meet you, won't you guess my name?timschochet said:Also, after I praised Trump for the new South Korea trade agreement last week, he is already threatening to walk away from it, and his statements about it indicate that he has no idea of its details and, contrary to the White House assertions, has nothing to do with its negotiation.
Sigh. I do try to praise this President from time to time when he does something that I think is good for the country, even inadvertently, but every time I do I feel a bit like Charlie Brown trying to kick Lucy’s football.
Lucifer, and you are in need of some restraint.Pleased to meet you, won't you guess my name?
Well, he can't carry a big stick in those tiny hands and still tweet...so, small stick it is.It seems Trump's motto is to boast loudly while carrying a small stick
They're easy to win!Wait, I thought we already won the trade war? China is weak and immediately capitulated?
Trump still isn't sure how the war started.Did we win the war yet?
To be fair, a stick in small hands, looks big.Well, he can't carry a big stick in those tiny hands and still tweet...so, small stick it is.
China just spanked Trump and publicly humiliated him/the U.S.
Yes....but you forget we have the legendary “backtrack” card in our hand in which we are waiting for the right time to lay it down.It can't be pointed out enough that Trump is still at the bluffing stage and China's already on to the action portion of the program. We are being impacted immediately having done NOTHING. Unreal.
Yeah amazing what happens when you don't have one the stupidest people on the planet running your government.China doing the smart thing here- their specific tariffs are designed to punish key red states, like Iowa. Already politicians like Joni Ernst and even that idiot bigot Steve King are complaining to Trump- they don't like what they're hearing from the folks back home.
Yeah, I'd presume if we had adults running the government and for some reason tariffs were considered, the responses would be predicted. This anticipatory governance concept is something that I'm 100% certain no Trump official has heard of.Yeah amazing what happens when you don't have one the stupidest people on the planet running your government.