Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I don’t really want her but I think this is a little unfair too.
Trump couldn't beat cadaver. His disapproval rating on inauguration day was 37%. it's now 54%.
Hopefully not...but her political negatives play right into Trump’s tiny orange hands is all I’m saying.
Well, he's gonna be tweeting something sneering and dismissive about every Dem candidate. But it's also true that the low information older people particularly love "Pocahontas."
Iowa was a democratic senate seat for 30 years. I could see that being put back into play in 2020. But AL is likely lost, so I guess yea, doesn't look good
The answer to the question posed by that stupid Politico column was always obvious: Warren can avoid a Clinton redux by capitalizing on the inevitable backlash to things like that stupid Politico column.
That had nothing to do with it for me. Her demeanor in campaign appearances was smug, and her smile is forced and creepy. SNL did a pretty good job cartooning it.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
I realize that it may be comforting (especially from a conservative perspective) to think that Trump only won because Hillary was a bad candidate, and that any "average" Democrat would surely defeat him.IvanKaramazov said:
It really depends who the candidate is. I don't recall where you live, but Trump will not lose the South in the next election.IvanKaramazov said:
WI, MI, PA, OH and FL. He could lose the popular vote - again - but the electoral math is pretty cut and dry. This is the reality.
He WILL lose the popular vote again, courtesy of California and a few other populous states with heavy blue majorities. 2020 will indeed come down to Dems flipping some of the states you mentioned (I would put Ohio pretty solidly in the red column and move Arizona and Georgia into the group of contested states).
Two important points here:
That's the question I keep asking myself: has Don won over more voters who didn't vote for him in '16 than he has lost by being every bit the Donald they didn't think he would be? Because if the answer is "no," then he's toast.
A Democrat could outperform Hillary by 5 million votes and flip 3 swing states and still lose to Trump.
It would take some crazy breaks for the Dem candidate to get five million more votes than the Hilldog and still lose the EC. I've got a decent candidate doing about three million better but that should be enough. I still don't know where Donald gets the replacements for his three million voters who will have since died.
I’m more concerned with him claiming the vote is not legitimate or he won’t relinquish power - I may be naive but I don’t see any way he wins. If the Republicans were smart they would try and get him out before the general election (primary him).
It will be interesting to see if she gets much traction. There is room for a young progressive to have a niche.
I kinda think that Don thinks that he has to run and that he has to win. Winning means even more power and fewer restraints than he has now. Losing means facing the legal music in multiple jurisdictions.
I think if someone primaried Trump it would help the GOP hold the White House. The Democrats still haven't fixed their messaging and will also face an electoral college problem that brought Trump into office. They also don't have a compelling, electable candidate without significant flaws. A relatively moderate conservative like Romney would solidify the support of the GOP and would win over a lot of independents that don't like the Democrats' shift to the left.
The way the map is stacked up for 2020 the Democrats have a pretty decent chance of creating a 50-50 split, which means the White House is critical.
Yes! Her or Amy Klobuchar are my leading candidates at the moment!
