It "ended" RGB, Manziel, and Mariota didn't look so good.Pipes said:Matt Ryan had his best season statistically with LaFleur. Goff made a gigantic leap with LaFleur. Obviously hard to say if LaFleur deserves credit for that but I’ll take it as positive marks for him.
LaFleur introduced Zone Blocking rather than the hybrid scheme that the TEN OL had used in 2017. When they brought in Mularkey for a couple of weeks mid season and went back to the hybrid blocking scheme was when Henry took off. @Bri can no doubt explain it better.sho nuff said:Also listening to some Nashville radio and looking back to the start of the season...Henry wasn’t exactly ignored earlier in the year...he was being outplayed by Lewis. 18 carries each in week 1 and 2 and around 3 yards a carry. I think many things happened to gets henry to those end of the year breakouts. He ran differently, the Titans used him better, and the Oline performed better than earlier. So just trying to question the OC on his use may be a bit short sighted.
I don't know what he hangs his hat on right now.The history of teams firing a HC who won a Super bowl with them is very ugly. The next coach is always worse, regardless of how far the SB winning coach had fallen. LaFleur having next to no track record makes me pretty nervous. The Titans offense was pretty bad last year, and LaFleur never called plays anywhere else. He wasn't really on the radar as a coaching candidate going into the season, why did his stock go up?
I hope I'm wrong, because the NFL is more fun when the Packers are good, but in a year of almost universally bad moves by the Packers, this feels like another.
Cautionary story lines abound here and I agree.Clearly must have blown them away in the interviews but smells a bit like desperation, hiring a guy and hoping he caught the Shanahan/McVay magic. I’m hoping for the best but seems like at least they should have hired a proven oc as head coach, not a one year disappointment from the titans.
I mean this year was lost anyway...but how much has poor special teams cost the Packers over the years?Rest in diarrhea Ron Zook
Proof is in the pudding.....One thing that was mentioned that makes a lot of sense is that LaFleur should have not been considered for the job because of Mularkey. When the offense was struggling, the Titans went at their old coach (still being paid) for offensive tips and he became a silent advisor for the rest of the year. If he needed help to get things rolling, why would GB offer him a job rather than wait til he gets things rolling on his own? I think this is an excellent point BUT that could bring just enough humility where he hires the right guys to help him and is the rare open-minded coach because of what happened.
I hate when people do this. Nobody is going to become the next Bill Bellichick. Not sure you can label Hackett as a run first OC given he has had to work with Blake Bortles or EJ Manuel as his QBs. If he were to run a pass first offense with Bortles or Manuel at QB, then I'd be worried. Besides, the Packers have been pass happy the last couple of years. How's that work out? They need to get back to a more balanced offense. And I don't think they are a RB challenged team. Jones and Williams will do very well in a balanced offense. I look forward to the pre-season games when we can see what sort of offense they actually roll out.terrible hire, Nat Hackett..just terrible..you have one of the greatest QB's ever and you want to give him a run-first OC? so, the Packers are a RB-challeged team, with a porous defense and lacking WR's not named Adams, an aging line, and you want to give Rodgers Mr Hackett..uggh...now you need to commit to the run which you're not capable of doing with the players currently on the roster.
way to turn Rodgers in to a 17-24-224-1 QB..LOL
I'm sorry but hiring these script kiddies like Hackett and LeFleur is a recipe for disaster. two nobodies who've done nothing on other teams won't suddenly flip the switch and become Bill Bellichick.
In addition...LaFleur is going to be the one calling things. A guy who has learned from offenses in Atlanta and St. Louis (who passed the ball a decent amount while he was there I believe).I hate when people do this. Nobody is going to become the next Bill Bellichick. Not sure you can label Hackett as a run first OC given he has had to work with Blake Bortles or EJ Manuel as his QBs. If he were to run a pass first offense with Bortles or Manuel at QB, then I'd be worried. Besides, the Packers have been pass happy the last couple of years. How's that work out? They need to get back to a more balanced offense. And I don't think they are a RB challenged team. Jones and Williams will do very well in a balanced offense. I look forward to the pre-season games when we can see what sort of offense they actually roll out.
Agreed Hackett is going to be calling plays about as much as Clements and Philbin did under McCarthy.sho nuff said:In addition...LaFleur is going to be the one calling things. A guy who has learned from offenses in Atlanta and St. Louis (who passed the ball a decent amount while he was there I believe).
Its a wait and see hire...anyone proclaiming it great or terrible is trying to get reactions.
Nothing, if it were my decision. I dont think the Packers should give up what Brown is going to cost.Headaches aside...what do you give up to put Antonio Brown opposite Davante Adams in this offense?
Redskins too. Everyone always writes Rams but most of these coaches discuss their time with the Redskins as formativeIn addition...LaFleur is going to be the one calling things. A guy who has learned from offenses in Atlanta and St. Louis (who passed the ball a decent amount while he was there I believe).
Its a wait and see hire...anyone proclaiming it great or terrible is trying to get reactions.
Never underestimate the value of proximity to the perfect example of what not to do.Redskins too. Everyone always writes Rams but most of these coaches discuss their time with the Redskins as formative
I think the connection is interesting. LaFleur got advised by Mularkey at times this year and Hackett is a Marrone guy who is Mularkey's buddy. If I'm not mistaken, Marrone lives in TN too.terrible hire, Nat Hackett..just terrible..you have one of the greatest QB's ever and you want to give him a run-first OC? so, the Packers are a RB-challeged team, with a porous defense and lacking WR's not named Adams, an aging line, and you want to give Rodgers Mr Hackett..uggh...now you need to commit to the run which you're not capable of doing with the players currently on the roster.
way to turn Rodgers in to a 17-24-224-1 QB..LOL
I'm sorry but hiring these script kiddies like Hackett and LeFleur is a recipe for disaster. two nobodies who've done nothing on other teams won't suddenly flip the switch and become Bill Bellichick.
I feel like that's a breaking bad quote but...not sureNever underestimate the value of proximity to the perfect example of what not to do.
Great post.Yesterday amplified my frustration with this years Packers.
Watching NE the last couple of weeks you see how they play. Run the ball, short quick passes and Brady doesn’t get touched. It’s what the Packers have done in the past...it’s what they did in the second half of the Bears game when Rodgers was hurt. And for some of the Vikings game after that. And then poof, that was gone.
Also watch those drives...3rd down and it’s still a quick pass on a slant to a WR who isn’t necessarily wide open. Reminded me of the throw to Jennings late in the Super Bowl. When was the last time Rodgers threw a ball like that?
My other frustration...is damn thebOats and BB are just so damn good at getting everything out of guys. They don’t have stars and studs on defense...but at the end of the year they always have guys making plays and making it hard on an offense. Same on the O line...they dominated much of that game on both lines.
Hipefully this change in coaching sparks some things. I’m hopeful based on things I’ve read about Lafleur as far as being very smart. I’m hopeful he and Rodgers use that football IQ I think they both have...
But it’s definitely cautious optimism at this point.
Oline needs work...IMO that and pass rush are top top priority.
It was brought to light by who? Someone selling the Art Smith hire?During the most brief announcement of Arthur Smith become the Titans new OC, it was brought to light that he was in charge of red zone offense and defense and called most of the plays for both units. That would bug me if I was a Packers fan because that means LaFleur didn't even do that
Honey Badger?
Honey Badger may not give a ####, but he ain't playing anywhere 'cold'. Mathieu has stated that numerous times over the years.would love to see Honey Badger there
Honey Badger may not give a ####, but he ain't playing anywhere 'cold'. Mathieu has stated that numerous times over the years.
As long as its Christmas...can we ask for AB...with Jordy's attitude?Hey! It’s my Christmas list. I can put anything I want on it.
Hater.
Lang has concussion and other injury issues. Not sure he’s even going to play anymore.And I’d love to see a reunion with TJ Lang.
I like the idea of going after Ford. I had not thought about making a run at Moseley but I like that idea too.Balco said:The window is still there but it is closing fast.
I get on the phone with KC right now and see if a second will secure Dee Ford. Then cut Clay Matthews.
Offer a blank check to CJ Moseley to pair inside with Blake Martinez.
Aaron needs more playmakers on offense. A middle of the field sure handed receiver is needed. Cole Beasley would be great.
Cut Jimmy Graham and find a tight end who can move and catch.
The defense suffered a ton of injuries last year but there is talent. They desperately need speed in the front seven, as always. Ford would be a great first step.
I'd agree they still have a window, but I'd be very wary of Ford. He was a 1st round bust until having a monster contract season. He could just be another Nick Perry. I'd greatly prefer to keep the 2nd, and not shell out a huge deal.Balco said:The window is still there but it is closing fast.
I get on the phone with KC right now and see if a second will secure Dee Ford. Then cut Clay Matthews.
Offer a blank check to CJ Moseley to pair inside with Blake Martinez.
Aaron needs more playmakers on offense. A middle of the field sure handed receiver is needed. Cole Beasley would be great.
Cut Jimmy Graham and find a tight end who can move and catch.
The defense suffered a ton of injuries last year but there is talent. They desperately need speed in the front seven, as always. Ford would be a great first step.
Great post. As a packer fan, I agree with most all of this. One part I think I might change is drafting Greedy at 12. I think if King can stay healthy, he can fill that role. But that's a big if.I'd agree they still have a window, but I'd be very wary of Ford. He was a 1st round bust until having a monster contract season. He could just be another Nick Perry. I'd greatly prefer to keep the 2nd, and not shell out a huge deal.
I'm a Bears fan, so I tend to sometimes look at the Packers weaknesses more than their strengths if that makes sense. With that said, if i were them, I'd hope to do the following:
Sign a Safety. I thought that was the biggest issue with the team(and only got bigger when Haha was traded) there were constant breakdowns in the back end. Earl Thomas would be a great target, both as arguably still the best Safety in the NFL, and a guy to fill the leadership void Matthews leaves behind, but Adrian Amos would be a nice fallback option. I am very disappointed the Bears are letting him walk, as he was the 2nd best player on the team in my opinion.
Draft Greedy Williams at #12, a Williams/Alexander/Jackson trio could be very dangerous for opposing offenses going forward.
Draft Hollywood Brown at #30. The Packers have been a lot more dink and dunk then having Rodgers suggests they should be. Brown is a DeSean Jackson clone, and not only would make big plays, but allow more space for others underneath.
Draft Blake Cashman(or Ben Burr-Kirven) in round 2. I agree LB is a big need, but Mosley isn't a blank check level guy. Frankly, I don't even think he's the best FA LB, that would be Jordan Hicks in my opinion, but my point is this is a very deep LB draft.
I'm on board with bringing back Lang too, assuming he is willing.
And maybe Amos from the Bears at safety.Signed Za’Darius Smith from BAL. Interesting signing - he’s young, has shown some spark, and is prototypical size for a 3-4 OLB. I guess the question is how much it cost and can he carry that play over to being a full time impact guy.
And maybe Amos from the Bears at safety.
I like the Smith signing obviously depending on the money. But a productive player.