Stealthycat
Footballguy
are you asking if I'm an anti anti-gun person ?Captain Cranks said:Would it be fair to label you anti-gun controllers?
yes, yes I am !!
are you asking if I'm an anti anti-gun person ?Captain Cranks said:Would it be fair to label you anti-gun controllers?
See, this is where you go off the partisan rails for me. The president of the united states may have been colluding with a foreign adversary to sway our election and you act like it's no big deal. The Stormy Daniels thing? Sure...I can understand your attitude there. But can you honestly say from an objective basis that if this was Barrack Obama's campaign that may have been colluding with the Russians, the story would just be an attempt to sow discord?Trump = conservative in most cases
I wonder just how many Trump voters actually like him - he's not likable, he's an #####. What we DO like is that he's carrying through with what he promised on conservative things, we missed that for 8 years of liberal Obama ran govt
I know for me, I'm tired of the year and a half of constant daily CNN attacks on Trump. His affair with a porn gal a decade ago is irrelevant to me. The Russia thing is a huge waste of time and only designed to sow discord IMO. It hardens me to see it constantly and makes me defiant of Trump and to allow him to do this job we the people elected him to do.
I hate Trump's tweeting most of the time, I understand that outlet, I just wish he did is presidentially vs like a guy 6 beer's into an eveningThe General said:The president, leader of the Republican Party, spends the majority of his time communicating with the country like a forum troll. He would probably be banned here in a few months
I think this gives the Dems the upper hand at the moment in this conversation.
So you're for the full deregulation of fully automatic guns, rocket launchers and military grade warfare?yes to me anti-gun is when you want to put in place laws that impact 100% legal law abiding people and do nothing towards criminals. I see zero positives in doing that.
I'm in favor of abortion only in medical situations ... am I anti-abortion or pro-abortion ? or somewhere in between ?
its easy to talk anti-xxx and pro-xxxx ....... it clearly defines the lines drawn in the sand. heck in some of these threads people want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, ban semi-auto guns, etc ..... that's pretty anti if you ask me !!
but yeah, its a blanket statement for sure, however Democrat platform is anti-gun, consistent and true, they'd ban them all if they could, I've posted links to the latest bills proposed to ban literally almost every gun hunters and sportsmen have, sponsored by Democrats of course
alleged Trump collusion with Russia - and its a big deal if it were real, I'm very sure it isn't however if I'm wrong I can admit that, and will join for his OustingSee, this is where you go off the partisan rails for me. The president of the united states may have been colluding with a foreign adversary to sway our election and you act like it's no big deal. The Stormy Daniels thing? Sure...I can understand your attitude there. But can you honestly say from an objective basis that if this was Barrack Obama's campaign that may have been colluding with the Russians, the story would just be an attempt to sow discord?
Dickies is correct. People can be, and have been, swayed through good discussion over the years.Because it's a cult of personality, it's not rational people disagreeing. They don't even agree on the rules of disagreement.
I expect the left to achieve some return to control this fall. I believe the repudiation will be dramatic.I honestly don't know if they or anyone would be capable of doing this. Trumpism alone was obviously problematic, but I mentioned the Merrick Garland thing because I think that particular display of naked partisanship and disregard for the unwritten rules of governance may well prevent Dems/the left from dismissing Trumpism as a fluke that won't be repeated and reconciling/returning to status quo. I have no idea how the Dems will behave if we survive the next 2-6 years and they return to power at some point. I'm not even sure how I want them to behave.
I never said that.So you're for the full deregulation of fully automatic guns, rocket launchers and military grade warfare?
Are you of the opinion that Mueller should shut down his investigation and that he's just wasting his time and taxpayer dollars?alleged Trump collusion with Russia - and its a big deal if it were real, I'm very sure it isn't however if I'm wrong I can admit that, and will join for his Ousting
we don't know all the details of what's happening in the political ringAre you of the opinion that Mueller should shut down his investigation and that he's just wasting his time and taxpayer dollars?
Nor did I ever say I was anti-gun, but you probably assumed as much because I'm for stricter gun control. You're also for gun control. You just want to keep the line where it currently stands. You know what's strange about the mass murders in this country? The murderer is almost always using a weapon that is easily available to the public. These people aren't going out and finding heavily regulated weapons to do their bidding. So while I agree that you won't stop the crimes with stricter gun control laws, I do think you decrease the casualties when the crimes are committed. Do you think the kill count would be the same had the Las Vegas shooter not used bump stocks?I never said that.
Right now in the US, we have great common sense gun laws including the above mentioned weapons and many others. We have background checks, age limits. We have concealed weapons courses, high gun ownership numbers and crime has fallen over the past 10-20 years. We have literally hundreds of laws saying don't harm someone, don't hurt people, don't assault people, don't kill people with ANY weapons.
Right now, mass murder are rare, school shootings rare. They're glamorized, but rare, and the real gun crimes that are drug related and domestic violence aren't mentioned much and nobody cares much, that's a damn tragedy right there.
As I've said, the proposed new regulations are idiot created that'll do nothing to impact gun violence. Common sense? Better defend schools, gun free is a massive failure. Fast hard penalties - Cruz should be on trial right now, sentenced next week to death IMO. How can the Pulse shooters wife get off so quick and school shooters aren't tried for years? baffling to me
We have lots in place right now to stop gun crimes - the failures are NOT law abiding legal gun owners. That Democrats want to place that on us baffles me
This isn't just about Trump. It's about his campaign. I think it's already being proved that his campaign colluded with the Russians on some level. How far up the chain it goes we don't know. Regardless of whether it reaches Trump, we are learning about Russia's involvement in our election and should be implementing ways in which to prevent such tampering in the future. But instead, Trump and his followers would like to sweep it all under the rug, act like it's no big deal, and undermine the credibility of the press who is attempting to hold those responsibility accountable.we don't know all the details of what's happening in the political ring
this is one of 3 ways IMO
- There is nothing there, and this whole thing is just to create chaos and division.
- There is a bit of something that's really nothing much and its being used to create chaos and division
- There is a LOT there and Trump will be impeached
2 of those 3 make Democrats look really bad. The 3rd one .... Nixon was clearly wrong, people saw what was happening. Bill Clinton lied under oath and to the nation, again clearly what happened. Trump if he did collude with Russia, what we're seeing is Russia kicking out diplomats, launching Satan 2 and if they helped Trump they're sure covering it well aint they? Nothing concrete anyone can see ... after how long ?
I'll bet on the first 2 being reality
Nope. Welcome to my ignore.Nope. That's exactly what you did.
Of course that’s what they want. After the years of Benghazi, emails, etc. they’ve put us all through. Even IF there’s nothing there (big if) screw them. Play by the rules and precedent YOU have set.This isn't just about Trump. It's about his campaign. I think it's already being proved that his campaign colluded with the Russians on some level. How far up the chain it goes we don't know. Regardless of whether it reaches Trump, we are learning about Russia's involvement in our election and should be implementing ways in which to prevent such tampering in the future. But instead, Trump and his followers would like to sweep it all under the rug, act like it's no big deal, and undermine the credibility of the press who is attempting to hold those responsibility accountable.
Overdue, imo. Now you have a fanclub, of course.Nope. Welcome to my ignore.
I'm just shocked that he's actually advanced past simply posting a rolling smile. He's learned to form sentences. I always try to encourage progress.I usually have RW on ignore, but since I started the thread I figured I'd listen to his opinion in here. Stupid move on my part.
depends on what you want to take from me if you're anti-gun or not I imagine and actually if I could write the law? I'd open up juvenile records so we can see who's violent and disturbed and add that to background checks, does that make me anti-gun ?Nor did I ever say I was anti-gun, but you probably assumed as much because I'm for stricter gun control. You're also for gun control. You just want to keep the line where it currently stands. You know what's strange about the mass murders in this country? The murderer is almost always using a weapon that is easily available to the public. These people aren't going out and finding heavily regulated weapons to do their bidding. So while I agree that you won't stop the crimes with stricter gun control laws, I do think you decrease the casualties when the crimes are committed. Do you think the kill count would be the same had the Las Vegas shooter not used bump stocks?
I can respect your opinion on guns. While I disagree with the conclusion, at least it's well reasoned and thoughtful. Regarding the Russia stuff, not so much. You seemingly want to dismiss facts that should be objective for both of us because of an unsupportable opinion that this is just a political witch hunt led by the DOJ and FBI who are historically managed by conservatives.depends on what you want to take from me if you're anti-gun or not I imagine and actually if I could write the law? I'd open up juvenile records so we can see who's violent and disturbed and add that to background checks, does that make me anti-gun ?
of course people use easy to acquire things - trucks, fertilizer, airplanes, knives etc - makes sense.
no, Paddock would easily have acquired illegally the guns he used - he was a millionaire, and Obama's fast and furious showed how lucrative gun running is, didn't it ?
but of all the school shootings, mass shootings, how many guns were illegally acquired? how many were not AR15 but shotguns, handguns, rifles ?
I want to stop these people before they act - I don't want to reduce their kill count and call that a success.
the question said why bother ?Nope. Welcome to my ignore.
Haven't read through this thread yet, but:Stealthycat said:Then I though surely I'd log in and someone would have a thread on the school kid who injured 22 with a knife in PA ...
He admitted that he had that story wrong. The PA stabbing was a few years ago and there was a stabbing in some other country that he got mixed up. It's all been straightened out.Haven't read through this thread yet, but:
Can't find anything about this on Google News, which has everything. Is some aspect inaccurate in your post? Different state? Different number of victims? Something else?
I'm not a Liberal....but I can't help think back to the barrage of relentless assaults about ANYTHING the Obamas did from just about every Right Wing media source. Two wrongs don't make a right......but I personally kind of enjoy putting the very same people who cried about Obamas suit color on the defensive about EVERY little Trump tick.Underachievers said:Liberals just need to stop crying about every percieved injustice. The seemingly constant barrage of protests and cries of racism, homophobia, misogyny etc etc has happened so often that you can no longer be taken seriously about anything.
Trump has MANY faults but someone in Washington is FINALLY saying and trying to do what half in this country want.
Sorry kids, but a huge part of this country in not liberal.
Trust me, we know. It's obvious.I'm not a Liberal....but I can't help think back to the barrage of relentless assaults about ANYTHING the Obamas did from just about every Right Wing media source. Two wrongs don't make a right......but I personally kind of enjoy putting the very same people who cried about Obamas suit color on the defensive about EVERY little Trump tick.
Me too. The guy is getting lit up for using Grey Poupon, meanwhile Trump eats his steak well done with ketchup and people are perfectly OK with that.I'm not a Liberal....but I can't help think back to the barrage of relentless assaults about ANYTHING the Obamas did from just about every Right Wing media source. Two wrongs don't make a right......but I personally kind of enjoy putting the very same people who cried about Obamas suit color on the defensive about EVERY little Trump tick.
Same. How long do you think you guys will be around for?I really can't wait until the mutants are gone and the rational people can go back to disagreeing about how government should serve the people. I think the country needs (at least) 2 healthy parties.
People like Pelosi and Ryan need to ride off into the sunset and we need to get some people who actually have some principles back in there. As much as I don't agree with him on several points, the "post-IDGAF" Trey Gowdy has been refreshing. More people like that who simply aren't beholden to the talking points 110%.I really can't wait until the mutants are gone and the rational people can go back to disagreeing about how government should serve the people. I think the country needs (at least) 2 healthy parties.
Similarly, I’ve heard some liberals say that Clarence Thomas should never criticize affirmative action since he benefited from it. I think they’re wrong, too.I would like to believe most were turned off by the perceived protest of a country that allowed him to make millions playing a child's game not his race...
It may be a decent argument for term limits.People like Pelosi and Ryan need to ride off into the sunset and we need to get some people who actually have some principles back in there. As much as I don't agree with him on several points, the "post-IDGAF" Trey Gowdy has been refreshing. More people like that who simply aren't beholden to the talking points 110%.
So, aI'm just shocked that he's actually advanced past simply posting a rolling smile. He's learned to form sentences. I always try to encourage progress.
Maybe the Right needs to just come out and say it...... "we were irrational ##### to Obama.".....Trust me, we know. It's obvious.
I connect the dotsI can respect your opinion on guns. While I disagree with the conclusion, at least it's well reasoned and thoughtful. Regarding the Russia stuff, not so much. You seemingly want to dismiss facts that should be objective for both of us because of an unsupportable opinion that this is just a political witch hunt led by the DOJ and FBI who are historically managed by conservatives.
I was wrong and confused the Russia knifing with the US school knifing last week and the bad PA one all in one .... there wasn't a bad US mass knifing last week, I got things mixed on thatHaven't read through this thread yet, but:
Can't find anything about this on Google News, which has everything. Is some aspect inaccurate in your post? Different state? Different number of victims? Something else?
I mean he was a terrible president but yeah some people went over board(including Trump) with the birth certificate thing.Maybe the Right needs to just come out and say it...... "we were irrational ##### to Obama.".....
I connect the dots
After the election, nationwide chaos in the form of boycott's, marching in the streets, media blitz all against Trump who trounced Hillary in the election. Why? because the left lost - nothing more, nothing less
ever see the right behave like that? ever ?
the failure to approve Trump nominations time and time again, slowing Trump down as much as possible, even the tales of how Obama leaving was a trail of roadblocks for Trump and the new administration
it was income taxes, then Russia, then Stormy and I'm sure I've forgotten all the other things the left has used to create chaos and unrest
that's where I am with the Russia thing, if I'm wrong I'll admit it and join for calling Trump to be dismissed ... but so far, all i see is facebook selling slots for hackers to create chaos in America and dumb people flowing into the streets following a facebook following just because - not much else
Well this is a huge surprise.I was wrong and confused the Russia knifing with the US school knifing last week and the bad PA one all in one .... there wasn't a bad US mass knifing last week, I got things mixed on that
Nope. Never. Great call.I connect the dots
After the election, nationwide chaos in the form of boycott's, marching in the streets, media blitz all against Trump who trounced Hillary in the election. Why? because the left lost - nothing more, nothing less
ever see the right behave like that? ever ?
Have you followed American politics outside of this last year? Not showing your income taxes, banging and paying off porn stars while of your 3rd marriage These are kind of deal breakers until this dope.I connect the dots
After the election, nationwide chaos in the form of boycott's, marching in the streets, media blitz all against Trump who trounced Hillary in the election. Why? because the left lost - nothing more, nothing less
ever see the right behave like that? ever ?
the failure to approve Trump nominations time and time again, slowing Trump down as much as possible, even the tales of how Obama leaving was a trail of roadblocks for Trump and the new administration
it was income taxes, then Russia, then Stormy and I'm sure I've forgotten all the other things the left has used to create chaos and unrest
that's where I am with the Russia thing, if I'm wrong I'll admit it and join for calling Trump to be dismissed ... but so far, all i see is facebook selling slots for hackers to create chaos in America and dumb people flowing into the streets following a facebook following just because - not much else
oh come on nowI honestly can't recall a time when the right didn't boycott, march or throw hissy fits in the media.
I'm wrong before, will be again in the future, i can admit it when I am.Well this is a huge surprise.
The words posted matter. hthSo, a
- rolling smile = not smart enough to post words.
- post a few words = not smart enough to understand facts.
- post analogies (my personal favorite) = stupid and doesn't apply to this topic
- post a lot of words = beating a dead horse.
Was he really that terrible though? I hear some people say this but I honestly don't know what made him terrible. I can understand saying that he was not great or one of the best but I don't see him being terrible.I mean he was a terrible president but yeah some people went over board(including Trump) with the birth certificate thing.
They had marches. They weren't nationwide because the issues weren't as important to people. It turns out people care more about not being discriminated against, abused, assaulted and shot at than they do about having their health insurance premiums go up at a slightly higher rate than they did previouslyoh come on now
when Obama was elected the right had marches nationwide, asked for quiet spaces and cried on tv ? really ? no, they didn't do that, they didn't pour into the streets in the weeks after
Nope that video is cool on the soundbites from those 8 years. Obama is/was socialist and that administration killed it for debt increase. Trump might beat him, we'll see .... but that's 6 minutes of 8 years of GOP/conservative response to Obama.Nope. Never. Great call.
Stealthy, you seem like you can at least put in the effort to have a dialogue, but use this as a prime example of how your bias has caused you to be blind to some pretty obvious facts. I'm willing to concede that both sides have their own versions of hysteria, but your memory can't be that short to have forgotten what kind of hysteria we just endured from 2008 to 2016.
I'll agree there, I wish a conservative party would spring forth that gave me an optionAs for the boycotts, conservatives have talked out of both sides of their mouth for a long time and have been hilariously hypocritical in this respect
You don't get to project onto us things out of our control. If you are going to come here and converse with us as a community how about focusing on the things WE are saying? It's completely dishonest and disingenuous to be taking the position you're taking here. You blabber on and on and on and on and on and on about how people "don't want to discus......" and whine when people put you on ignore. This is why they do it. You don't want discussion. You want to attack by trying to make us, people here, justify positions other than our own and when people say "not interested" you throw out this "Hey guys, I'm here for the discussion, why all the sour ####es not wanting to talk?" shtick which is complete bull####.show me some proposed bills on gun control and I'll show you every one of them is orchestrated by liberals and Democrats
its 100% true
Divorce should be a deal breaker for the presidency?Have you followed American politics outside of this last year? Not showing your income taxes, banging and paying off porn stars while of your 3rd marriage These are kind of deal breakers until this dope.
From the wife beater wearing guy that is perma-banned from another forum for wanting the president dead. Good times.I'm just shocked that he's actually advanced past simply posting a rolling smile. He's learned to form sentences. I always try to encourage progress.