What if we take the skeptic’s view?: As I mentioned above, skeptics tend to set 2016 aside when evaluating Dak. And they believe 2017 reflects the greater trend of Dak’s football experience as it played out so exactly to his rookie draft report. If we apply this same analysis just to 2017, we get 5 games (as OCC mentioned), a 4-1 record, and a 31.25% of games with a 100+ QB RTG. Those 5 games came against a listing Cardinal’s team, a Packer defense that was so crippled in the secondary they spent their first two draft picks on CBs, the atrocious 49’er team that didn’t have Jimmy G yet, a solid Chiefs team that was, nevertheless, in the midst of a 1-6 run, and a Giants squad that had imploded. There’s some obvious reasons to believe competition level played a role in all of these games. Against outmanned teams, the entire Dallas scheme gets going, which means Dak gets going.
And I think that’s the trend we are seeing….when Dallas’ offense is performing well, then Dak performs well. But it doesn’t seem to work the other way. I don’t see Dak lifting the rest of the team through his performance. Nor do I think we should expect this of him. Dak’s strength is leadership. If the rest of the team can do its job, it seems to allow him to be a force multiplier. But if you need him to be the catalyst, the thing that breaks a defense and forces them to adjust, I think you’re up the creek without a paddle. I see a +Game Manager at best here, not an elite QB on the verge of cracking Top Three in the League. And I also believes tha tmatches the on field results.