Henry Ford
Footballguy
Me too.I got blocked by him on twitter because i kept asking him if he had printed his retraction story yet.
Me too.I got blocked by him on twitter because i kept asking him if he had printed his retraction story yet.
oppsYeah good pointI am not sure why we are talking about Shaun King in a thread about racist rhetoric in public, probably should be in the one of the racism/racial profiling threads, but carry on.
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/766555-racist-rhetoric-in-public-has-it-now-become-normalized/?do=findComment&comment=21059348
Shaun King asking people to identify Aaron Schlossberg from the online video in the OP is unrelated to his tweet in which he supported the woman who made the false claim against the police. That is a different subject matter as it did not involve using racist rhetoric in a public setting.
I thought so
The correct response is "oops"
Sorry, the subject matter is completely different and the only thing in common is Shaun King. You want to conflate the two fine, but I don't see that they are related.The correct response is "oops"
I guess you squispoke again.Sorry, the subject matter is completely different and the only thing in common is Shaun King. You want to conflate the two fine, but I don't see that they are related.
If you expect me to reply in the future you need to stop with the nicknames.I guess you squispoke again.
Shaun KingVerified account @ShaunKing 1hRamblin Wreck said:Shaun King is such a clown. Can't believe anyone ever posts his nonsense to back their race-baiting.
https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/999177656317837312
.@ShaunKing spread the claim that this woman was raped & held hostage by a Texas Highway Patrol Trooper. The Texas Department of Public Safety just released the 2-hour video from the DWI arrest... it appears as though none of it is true:
Odds King learned his lesson and waits for the facts next time?Shaun KingVerified account @ShaunKing 1h
When the “victim” you fought for turns out to be the victimizer: Sherita Dixon-Cole and the painful consequences of a false report of sexual assault and police misconduct. My open thoughts.
https://medium.com/@ShaunKing/when-the-victim-you-fought-for-turns-out-to-be-the-victimizer-sherita-dixon-cole-and-the-painful-cec6ca8f3670
I hope you reported that to hrI'd never heard the n-word at work until last fall during the NFL kneeling kerfuffle by a subordinate of mine. To say that open racism isn't on the rise is to deny the obvious.
This is nothing more then an I'm sorry I got caught for being a racist bigot in the act. I live in the area this clown is from. A cousin of mine went to school around the time he did and knew siblings who had family in this dudes class. People have come forward from HS and College who knew him with the typical responses "I'm not surprised", "If anyone were to do this everyone would've predicted him." "Always been a jerk". "Entilted", "Typical School yard bully." "Thats Adam for ya to a T." etc etc. two people claimed they kicked his ### for bullying others or being a jerk when in HS as well. This is your typical I'm sorry I was caught response.squistion said:I would like to believe this is a sincere apology, but it is hard not to be skeptical where there are multiple incidents captured on video over the years of him screaming at, harassing or otherwise trying to intimidate and bully immigrants, minorities or people who he thinks are different than him,
Perhaps he had some sort of an epiphany, and will change his ways, but I doubt it.
Here is his complete apology on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/ASchlossbergLaw/status/998957026008096768
He claimed the Eagles were racist for not signing Kaepernick too. And everyone in the Eagles organization went after him. This guy loves to stir the pot. He's half black himself. The thing I hate about some people is they are so quick to pull the race card it's like the boy who cried wolf too many times. Two things that I agree with thoughMystery Achiever said:King also stirred the pot claiming to have been told the Eagles were adding a QB other than Kaepernick when Wentz tore his ACL. A story that no one who cover the NFL had. And didn't pan out.
King is one of those people that if something doesn't agree with his opinion he's quick to pull the race card into it. He's been accused by both sides over the years for false stories on racism. He tried to get the Eagles involved on a story with Kaepernick when Wentz went down and were signing a QB. Like Mystery said no NFL reporter had this story. Then when the team signed didn't sign a QB and kept Nate Sudefield he claimed the Eagles were racist for not signing Kaepernick. King got made into a jackass when someone mentioned to him Jeffrey Lurie isn't a racist and one of the most Liberal owners in the NFL. He donated to HRC's Campaign adnd is a big donor to Liberal political people. I also think after that incident King deleted one of his tweets on the Eagles too.timschochet said:I don’t know Shaun King. Perhaps he is a shameless self-promoter. It’s pretty rare when charges about an act of racism in our society turn out to be false. It does happen, just not very often. Unfortunately nearly every instance of a false charge is used by conservative types to argue that systemic racism doesn’t exist. I mean they are still talking about he Duke Lacrosse story over a decade later, which is really sad.
Systemic, institutionalized racism does exist, guys. We need to deal with it.
That's not a nickname. It's no different than "coachspeak"If you expect me to reply in the future you need to stop with the nicknames.
I actually don't deny it exist. It's just more then King is notorious for false racism claims that both sides have accused him of it in the past as well. He's nothing more then a pot stirrer. He's the Left's version of Milo Yanninopolus or whatever that guys last name is on the Right who makes false claims himself constantly.timschochet said:Again, I don’t know King. But I can’t blame anyone for getting taken in by false claims because they are very rare. I can and do blame people who focus on those false claims, and yes those same people deny systemic racism all the time.
The problem with King is if we don't scrutinize him who will? And if no one does he has a bunch of followers drinking the cool aid who will continue to follow his movement of false racial claims. That's no better in helping the current situation then the racism itself.Ilov80s said:True but he is probably the most famous reporter of cases of racial bias in the country. He has 977k followers on Twitter. So even if he is a jerk and a crap reporter, he needs to be paid attention to, scrutinized, etc.
I don’t think all his claims are false. I think he’s working for a good cause but how he does it is sloppy and thus actually hurts his purpose.The problem with King is if we don't scrutinize him who will? And if no one does he has a bunch of followers drinking the cool aid who will continue to follow his movement of false racial claims. That's no better in helping the current situation then the racism itself.
Kind of agree with you here. Aaron was pretty blatant with what he did. King just wanted people to ID the guy. Even if he didn't ask someone would've eventually. Especially locally here of people who knew him. He's the talk of the town right now and not in a good way and my area is pretty conservative these days.Shaun King asking people to identify Aaron Schlossberg from the online video in the OP is unrelated to his tweet in which he supported the woman who made the false claim against the police. That is a different subject matter as it did not involve using racist rhetoric in a public setting.
Never said all his are false but he should pick and chose his battles better. It seems this guy just goes looking for racism when it's not there just to make an article deadline. He's like the manager who looks for every in-fractionment he can on employee even if one isn't there. I had a really good co manager at my retail job when it came to discipline but it got to the point he literally went looking for someone to punish who wasn't following protocol and people started hating him. His motives were in the right place he was just going completely overboard. He was transferred to another store do to manager changes elsewhere but died of Pancreatic Cancer about 5 or so yrs ago which was pretty sad.I don’t think all his claims are false. I think he’s working for a good cause but how he does it is sloppy and thus actually hurts his purpose.
0% maybe I'm being too mean I'll say 5%Odds King learned his lesson and waits for the facts next time?
My work had hired this AA Male maybe 2 yrs ago now. Unfortunately my Produce manager didn't fire the dude before his probation was up and has kicked himself for it ever since. Produce sent him upfront as a cart grabber and stuff. Dude did carts well but he stopped to talk to anything with longhair a ##### and set of ####. He was a little talkative with the I could tell the women were feeling uncomfortable. Kept making claims of racism against my Produce manager and went on a rant some of these AA people go on conspiracy theory wise. One of our salad bar girls also black went up to my produce manager embarrassed for this guys actions and apologized and my produce manager said there was no need for her too. Anyway my Store director was distraught about firing this guy because he was the type to pull the race card (My seafood manager I was friends with overheard a meeting in the office talking about the guy and my Storie director admitted as much) and he doesn't like controversy. So eventually they started giving him less hrs Dude apparently came and left as he pleased and he got himself screwed over. Bosses finally booked him on Job Abandonment. Dude also lied about being in the military and other things. A co worker and I use to call him Rico Suave.I hope you reported that to hr
You called it a movement of false claims. I agree he is looking for it, which is fine. He just needs to be a more discerning patient journalist.Never said all his are false but he should pick and chose his battles better. It seems this guy just goes looking for racism when it's not there just to make an article deadline. He's like the manager who looks for every in-fractionment he can on employee even if one isn't there. I had a really good co manager at my retail job when it came to discipline but it got to the point he literally went looking for someone to punish who wasn't following protocol and people started hating him. His motives were in the right place he was just going completely overboard. He was transferred to another store do to manager changes elsewhere but died of Pancreatic Cancer about 5 or so yrs ago which was pretty sad.
I think a lot of what he puts out is false. He does get it right from time to time. Maybe his heart is in the right place however besides this last false claim I've yet to see him retract any of the other big ones.You called it a movement of false claims. I agree he is looking for it, which is fine. He just needs to be a more discerning patient journalist.
Yeah we don’t know him so I have no idea how much he’s intentionally fanning flames for money with disregard for truth ( sure seems like it at times) or if he’s just a terrible sloppy journalist. I don’t care for his work despite respecting his attempted purpose.I think a lot of what he puts out is false. He does get it right from time to time. Maybe his heart is in the right place however besides this last false claim I've yet to see him retract any of the other big ones.
I don't either and was done with him after he tried to accuse the Eagles of Racism over the Kaepernick situation. Eagles fans blew him up on twitter for it even people mentioning how Lurie is one of if not the most Liiberal owner in the league. The Eagles already had 2 QBs. Plus CK just sued the NFL. Wouldn't be smart for a team who he is now basically suing to give him a job would it? I swear these people trying to make an agenda don't think these things through enough.Yeah we don’t know him so I have no idea how much he’s intentionally fanning flames for money with disregard for truth ( sure seems like it at times) or if he’s just a terrible sloppy journalist. I don’t care for his work despite respecting his attempted purpose.
Not a nickname so much as a newly coined term.If you expect me to reply in the future you need to stop with the nicknames.
Funny, but from the comments several thought that it was staged as there was no reason whoever was holding the phone should have started recording right before things escalated. Notice that the black guy pretty effortlessly heaves the kid over the counter and then doesn't stick around either after the kid starts throwing the frozen fries at him.
Is that david silver?
Certainly not - Louis Farrakhan has been tolerated and even celebrated in many political circles and has been for years/decades.Obviously this type of behavior is not new
That article doesnt say how old he is, but based on the fact he had a cane i would assume he is old. Old people are even less likely than women to be convicted and sentenced for long. It also doesnt really mention how injured the guy was that he zapped. Probably minor or i imagine it would be described.
[squis]Matthias said:Relevant: Roseanne Barr tweets racial slur. Conservative America jumps out of its chair to defend her.
Who has defended Barr?Matthias said:Relevant: Roseanne Barr tweets racial slur. Conservative America jumps out of its chair to defend her.
Majority expressing a proper reaction doesn't diminish a minority now feeling emboldened their ability to express it. Nor 40% of the country now trying to defend her.Relevant: Roseanne Barr makes racist tweet and is promptly #### canned.
Yep, sounds normalized.
1.2% I give it that high because he might do it by accident thinking he is replying about something else.Odds you think the President will condemn her remarks?
The refusal of the President to denounce racists is, itself, a form of normalizing them and their speech.On Sunday, CNN host Jake Tapper asked the current GOP frontrunner if he’d disavow the support of racist groups like the Klan and one of its former leaders, David Duke, who recently threw his support behind the Donald. Rather than just flatly reject the endorsement from Duke, the well-known former face of the Klan, Trump claimed ignorance.
“I don’t know anything about David Duke, OK?” Trump said on the show “State of the Union.” “I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists. So, I don’t know.”
(It’s worth noting that this was either a lie or he’s forgetful: Trump ended a brief 2000 Reform Party bid for president, in part, by disparaging Duke, calling him “not the company I wish to keep.”)
Reagan, on the other hand, knew exactly how he felt about white supremacists supporting his then-re-election campaign against Walter Mondale. After initially ignoring the endorsement, Reagan was asked by the president of the United States Commission on Civil Rights to disavow the Klan and its support of his candidacy. He did so in a letter—rather forcefully.
”Those of us in public life can only resent the use of our names by those who seek political recognition for the repugnant doctrines of hate they espouse,” the president wrote. ”The politics of racial hatred and religious bigotry practiced by the Klan and others have no place in this country, and are destructive of the values for which America has always stood.”
On Monday, Trump—who was in Florida during his CNN interview and communicating with Tapper via-an earpiece—claimed that he couldn’t properly hear the question about Duke, who launched his own presidential campaign in 1988 and was elected to the Louisiana state legislature the following year.
Reagan, who was in China when he signed the letter disavowing the Klan’s endorsement, added, “while in China, I have been distressed to learn that some individuals back home have questioned whether my views on the Ku Klux Klan have somehow changed since 1980. Nothing could be further from the truth.”
Quite a reach.The refusal of the President to denounce racists is, itself, a form of normalizing them and their speech.
It's a continuum.Quite a reach.
The judge should have looked for a Woodrow Call quote upon sentencing. I would recommend this one:
Seriously link to 40% defending her anywhere? Hell how about 4% here?Majority expressing a proper reaction doesn't diminish a minority now feeling emboldened their ability to express it. Nor 40% of the country now trying to defend her.
I don't buy this at all.Majority expressing a proper reaction doesn't diminish a minority now feeling emboldened their ability to express it. Nor 40% of the country now trying to defend her.
OR it seemed "normal" for her to feel comfortable sending out the tweet in the first place...The answer is still no. If racist rhetoric was normalized, Roseanne Barr wouldn't have been fired within only a few hours of making a bigoted tweet.
One person -- even a president with the celebrity of Donald Trump -- cannot normalize anything for American society at large.For himself, Trump has moved towards neutral and endorsing neutral. That is a normalization.
If 5 years ago she would have never tweeted it in the first place, thinking that was wildly inappropriate and out of place, how would you characterize the social movement & trends? Normalization is a slightly misleading term. As it isn't a question if racist talk is now normal. It's a question if it has become more normal and accepted than it was in the past.The answer is still no. If racist rhetoric was normalized, Roseanne Barr wouldn't have been fired within only a few hours of making a bigoted tweet.
As I have pointed out previously in this thread. Normalized in the sense that people may feel emboldened to say or tweet these things when perhaps they wouldn't have before Trump was elected (no way to now for sure without rerunning history). With Trump referring to Hispanic immigrants as rapists and animals, that seems have lowered the bar this type of speech or conduct.The answer is still no. If racist rhetoric was normalized, Roseanne Barr wouldn't have been fired within only a few hours of making a bigoted tweet.
Dont bother. He has stats!!!One person -- even a president with the celebrity of Donald Trump -- cannot normalize anything for American society at large.