Actually, after some thought ... I can think of something kind of ethereal that I think it's a shame we've lost as a society: a kind of a live-and-let-live attitude about many peripheral social-justice issues. I used "peripheral" to specifically exclude things that would affect equal treatment under the law, or equality of opportunity or anything like that.
An example would be that in the 1980s, say, the ideal of "treating everyone equally" was seen as an unquestioned positive and something everyone should strive for in the interest of fairness. In the social media era, aiming to "treat everyone equally" is now seen as a social ill, and the people that aim for equal treatment as an interpersonal goal are treated as messed-up, backwards and bigoted "bad people" today. I understand the academic arguments about why this has shifted, but I haven't grokked them emotionally -- and I'm not sure that I can. I don't feel an actual pull to treat people in a way differently than the way I learned as a post-1964 kid in the 1970s-80s. I feel like the lessons I learned coming up in how to deal with people are still valuable -- and correct -- today.
Anyway. Not much to do with the OP ... but I don't think a general philosophical uneasiness over society's shifting sands is the hallmark of a bad human being. And to clarify: I don't mean "philosophical uneasiness" to mean "wanting things back to what they were in the 1950s!" It's more like questioning oneself internally about whether one has been misled all one's life, especially by adults in authority who truly seemed good and fairminded.