What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Trump EPA: Rocket fuel in your water? Yes, have some. (1 Viewer)

-fish-

Footballguy
A minor victory, but the EPA was ordered to produce the studies Pruitt relied on to refute climate change.  Hint:  they either don't exist or aren't credible.

Two more of his top aides resigned over the last 24 hours.

Pruitt is now facing his 12th ethics investigation.  His scandals include

  • Improper use of first class travel (he claimed it was for his safety);
  • Installation of a $43,000 soundproof phone booth in his office;
  • Spending $9,000 to sweep his office for listening devices;
  • Rental of a lobbyist's condominium for $50/night;
  • Improperly giving raises to aides without approval;
  • Email abuses including using four separate email accounts;
  • Using aides to seek a Chick-fil-a franchise for his wife;
  • Using aides to find a used Trump Hotel mattress;
  • Asking aides to find some reason for him to visit vacation destinations, including Fiji.
On top of that, as to the actual work of the EPA, he's been not only disastrous, but working illegally.  The courts have struck down six attempts to delay or roll back regulations on pesticides, lead paint and renewable-fuel requirements

More than 700 employees have resigned from the EPA since he took over, many with scathing resignation letters.   

But some of the biggest, and most overlooked, changes Pruitt has made at the EPA have come by not doing anything at all. He’s steering the EPA’s work at an agonizingly slow pace,delaying and slowing the implementation of laws and running interference for many of the sectors EPA is supposed to regulate. His EPA has also collected far fewer fines from polluters than any of the last three administrations during the same time.

With more staff and funding cuts looming, even fewer toxic chemicals and other environmental hazards will be measured, and the statutes that protect against them won’t be enforced.

“People will get sick and die,” Christine Todd Whitman, who served as EPA administrator under President George W. Bush, told Vox. “It’s that simple.” Some 230,000 Americans already die each year due to hazardous chemical exposures. “You stop enforcing those regulations and that number will go way up,” she said.
When is enough enough with this guy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still cannot wrap my head around the mattress thing. There has to be more to wanting to buy a used hotel mattress than just wanting a good night's sleep.

 
Pruitt is certainly deserving of his own thread, as he has shown to be on the extreme end of the corruption scale.  It will take a separate thread just to keep track of all of it.  With each scandal that breaks on him, I find myself wondering how in the hell he still has a job.  He may be the best example of the hypocrisy of this administration... "Drain the swamp"... sure. 

 
From the same article quoted above:

Here are some of the environmental rules, actions, and proposals that have become mired in the morass:

The EPA announced it was seeking a two-year delay in implementing the 2015 Clean Water Rule, which defines the waterways that are regulated by the agency under the Clean Water Act.

In May, the EPA dialed back tracking the health impacts of more than a dozen hazardous chemicals at the behest of a Trump appointee at the agency, Nancy Beck.

The agency has said nothing about counties that failed to meet new ozone standards by an October 2017 deadline and now face fines.

Environmental law enforcement has declined. By September, the Trump administration launched 30 percent fewer cases and collected about 60 percent fewer fines than in the same period under President Obama.

The EPA punted on regulations on dangerous solvents like methylene chloride, a paint stripper, that were already on track to be banned, instead moving the process to “long term action.”

The EPA asked for a six-year schedule to review 17-year-old regulations on lead paint.

The implementation date of new safety procedures at chemical plants to prevent explosions and spills was pushed back to 2019.

Pruitt issued a directive to end “Sue & Settle,” a legal strategy that fast-tracks settlements for litigation filed against the EPA to force the agency to do its job. The agency will spend more time in courts fighting cases that it’s likely to lose.

The agency’s enforcement division now has to get approval from headquarters before investigating potential violations of environmental regulations, slowing down efforts to catch violators of laws like the Clean Water Act.
'cause we aren't sure if chemical plant explosions and spills are bad.

 
my guess is he'll produce a position paper from the Heritage Institute, or an op-ed by Fred Singer.

 
Don't have a link but just read (think it was Newsweek) that the EPA will no longer consider the health risks of asbestos already in homes or businesses. They apparently announced this "quietly". 

The article then quoted Trump from years ago saying he didn't believe there were any health risks from asbestos, that it was all a mob led conspiracy because it was mob connected businesses that always got the removal contracts.

Dont know what to even say anymore. He should just line up Americans and shoot them, same end result. We are being attacked on pretty much every front. 

 
Don't have a link but just read (think it was Newsweek) that the EPA will no longer consider the health risks of asbestos already in homes or businesses. They apparently announced this "quietly". 

The article then quoted Trump from years ago saying he didn't believe there were any health risks from asbestos, that it was all a mob led conspiracy because it was mob connected businesses that always got the removal contracts.

Dont know what to even say anymore. He should just line up Americans and shoot them, same end result. We are being attacked on pretty much every front. 
Actually shooting people is more humane then letting them die from asbestosis which is a nightmare. This admin is poop and it would be impossible to find a decent and moral person who supports it.

 
Put his awful policies aside.

The guy is the definition of "The Swamp" bull####. He works all kinds of deals for himself, his wife, spends money that's not his on crazy crap that he feels entitled to. The guy is the worst, well Trump is the worst, but this guy is close.

 
Don't have a link but just read (think it was Newsweek) that the EPA will no longer consider the health risks of asbestos already in homes or businesses. They apparently announced this "quietly". 

The article then quoted Trump from years ago saying he didn't believe there were any health risks from asbestos, that it was all a mob led conspiracy because it was mob connected businesses that always got the removal contracts.

Dont know what to even say anymore. He should just line up Americans and shoot them, same end result. We are being attacked on pretty much every front. 
insane.

 
Hypothetically, why not just eliminate the EPA?  Too obvious or no chance to pass the senate?

 
Hypothetically, why not just eliminate the EPA?  Too obvious or no chance to pass the senate?
People like the EPA.  It's not a partisan issue, except where it comes to polluters lobbying for less regulation.   In its relatively short existence, the EPA has been very effective at cleaning up pollution, enforcing regulations and collecting fines from polluters, reducing health risks and studying long-term effects of hazardous materials and practices.  

 
In early 1970, as a result of heightened public concerns about deteriorating city air, natural areas littered with debris, and urban water supplies contaminated with dangerous impurities, President Richard Nixon presented the House and Senate a groundbreaking 37-point message on the environment.  These points included:

requesting four billion dollars for the improvement of water treatment facilities;

asking for national air quality standards and stringent guidelines to lower motor vehicle emissions;

launching federally-funded research to reduce automobile pollution;

ordering a clean-up of federal facilities that had fouled air and water;

seeking legislation to end the dumping of wastes into the Great Lakes;

proposing a tax on lead additives in gasoline;

forwarding to Congress a plan to tighten safeguards on the seaborne transportation of oil; and

approving a National Contingency Plan for the treatment of oil spills.

Around the same time, President Nixon also created a council in part to consider how to organize federal government programs designed to reduce pollution, so that those programs could efficiently address the goals laid out in his message on the environment.

Following the council’s recommendations, the president sent to Congress a plan to consolidate many environmental responsibilities of the federal government under one agency, a new Environmental Protection Agency.  This reorganization would permit response to environmental problems in a manner beyond the previous capability of government pollution control programs:

The EPA would have the capacity to do research on important pollutants irrespective of the media in which they appear, and on the impact of these pollutants on the total environment.

Both by itself and together with other agencies, the EPA would monitor the condition of the environment--biological as well as physical.

With these data, the EPA would be able to establish quantitative "environmental baselines"--critical for efforts to measure adequately the success or failure of pollution abatement efforts.

The EPA would be able--in concert with the states--to set and enforce standards for air and water quality and for individual pollutants.

Industries seeking to minimize the adverse impact of their activities on the environment would be assured of consistent standards covering the full range of their waste disposal problems.

As states developed and expanded their own pollution control programs, they would be able to look to one agency to support their efforts with financial and technical assistance and training.

After conducting hearings during that summer, the House and Senate approved the proposal. The agency’s first Administrator, William Ruckelshaus, took the oath of office on December 4, 1970.
Under Pruitt, the EPA has attempted rollbacks or refused to perform its duties as to each of the bolded.

 
People like the EPA.  It's not a partisan issue, except where it comes to polluters lobbying for less regulation.   In its relatively short existence, the EPA has been very effective at cleaning up pollution, enforcing regulations and collecting fines from polluters, reducing health risks and studying long-term effects of hazardous materials and practices.  
I don’t disagree at all.  But you know if left up to Donnie and Pruitt it wouldn’t exist.  I guarantee it’s been discussed.

 
I don’t disagree at all.  But you know if left up to Donnie and Pruitt it wouldn’t exist.  I guarantee it’s been discussed.
No, it would still exist, if only for Pruitt to keep sucking it's yearly budget dry for his own fancies & foibles. And to keep getting his ridiculous salary he in no way deserves. Pruitt is a scumbag.

 
I think what Ben Carson is doing with HUD is way worse.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm convinced he's only there to make the rest of the cabinet look better in a  "That Betsy DeVos seems incompetent, but at least she's not as bad as the guy at the EPA" kind of way.

 
-fish- said:
"several of Pruitt’s former staffers have testified their policy was to prioritize document requests for EPA records made during the Obama administration"

So if you're asking about public records from the Obama era (not inquiring into our corrupt practices), we fulfill them right away. If it's delving into this little corner of the swamp we've created for ourselves, you're at the back of the line.

So bad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/government-and-politics/4459516-sd-corn-growers-plan-give-pruitt-cold-shoulder-during-visit

SD Corn Growers Executive Director Lisa Richardson said President Donald Trump promised to provide the pathway for year-round sales of E15 and Pruitt is not welcome in the state unless he is delivering on that promise.

"Our largest market far and away in South Dakota is ethanol. So, for him to come into our backyard and not keep the president's word on E15, we're just curious as to why he's here? Unless, he's here to announce E15, he is not welcome," she said.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top