I wonder if there is some loophole when it comes to the establishment clause that basically says “we’re not really injecting religion here because we’re being totally insincere”?Feels a little too churchy/statey. Am I right?
Maybe to give some kind of spiritual comfort, not in terms of enforcing the law. He's cherry picking some passage to support tearing kids away from their parents. It's both absurd and scary.Pretty sure a lot of past Presidents have spoken quotes from the Bible. World is just different now and people get furious about everything.
Like these snowflakesPretty sure a lot of past Presidents have spoken quotes from the Bible. World is just different now and people get furious about everything.
Context is everything.Pretty sure a lot of past Presidents have spoken quotes from the Bible. World is just different now and people get furious about everything.
July 4th is always a good day to share Romans 13:2 with friends and family:
No worries, Oats cuz....well....That place isn't real.Feels a little too churchy/statey. Am I right?
This is a US Constitution thread. Not a political thread. So please don’t beam me down to that bad place.
TIA
I am referring to a certain subforum that shall not be named.No worries, Oats cuz....well....That place isn't real.
(Oh, unless you meant, like, Florida. Then yeah....please don't throw me down in that there briar patch!", etc.")
I think you pretty much started a political thread in the main forum and attempted to get away with it.I am referring to a certain subforum that shall not be named.
Did you just call Jeff Sessions a "fake scum Christian" sir? I assure you that Jeff Sessions is 100% real, authentic scum, and to have you belittle a lifetime of effort to reach his lofty status of scumminess is frankly offensive.Like most fake-scum Christian's he quoted one part, out of context, in furtherance of a policy that is a violation of the rest of the verse, and demanded an adherance to the example of the passage instead of the teaching of the Word.
In other words, #### him.
Completely. But it plays to that segment so what do they care. It’s pretty disgusting to blatantly pander that obviously and pervert Christianity to further their own goals but somehow the people being pandered to are oblivious to it.Feels a little too churchy/statey. Am I right?
This is a US Constitution thread. Not a political thread. So please don’t beam me down to that bad place.
TIA
One thing I'll never forget from being christian, there's always some other christians that think you are not a real christian.Like most fake-scum Christian's he quoted one part, out of context, in furtherance of a policy that is a violation of the rest of the verse, and demanded an adherance to the example of the passage instead of the teaching of the Word.
In other words, #### him.
Proceed carefully.... just a tip. Honestly, just the tip.How long until this thread gets sent down with the sodomites.
“Salvation lies within.”How long until this thread gets sent down with the sodomites.
Wait you mean most of the population isn’t that smart?Completely. But it plays to that segment so what do they care. It’s pretty disgusting to blatantly pander that obviously and pervert Christianity to further their own goals but somehow the people being pandered to are oblivious to it.
We’re nearing the point where basically the whole FFA could be moved to that sub forum.Mods please move this to the religious sub forum
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, but notwithstanding the foregoing, Keebler Elves may freely misquote religious texts in an effort to drum up support from the dim.I wonder if there is some loophole when it comes to the establishment clause that basically says “we’re not really injecting religion here because we’re being totally insincere”?
True.... but he's wrong and I'm right.One thing I'll never forget from being christian, there's always some other christians that think you are not a real christian.
I used to be one of them.the bible seems the only book from eons ago that people want to follow to the letter of the law. heck, a cookbook from the 1960s says to use cigarettes ground up as a topping on cakes.