I think expecting civil unrest and death etc as the likely outcome of adding a few SCOTUS seats is more unreasonable than anything I am suggesting.
How would ACB be paying for anything if the court goes from 9 to 11? Sure her vote gets diluted a little but it doesn’t have anything to do with her personally.
If court packing is allowed and then, by some pathway, after time for partisan **** fighting to drive it, then Roe VS Wade is on track to be reversed. You'd have fringe elements who are either pro choice or pro life find that the easiest solution would be to pick off the SCOTUS Justices who don't line up to their views. Then pick off the nominees who lean the way they don't want. If you keep picking them off, no one will want to take the nomination once they see the handwriting on the wall. Translate that to any issue where radical elements will have incentive to engage and you still have this same problem.
This "you cheated, so I'm going to cheat, everyone cheats, let's cheat to win the way we want" is a slippery slope that will end up badly for the American people.
How many lefties here ( Let's not pretend this sub forum does not lean liberal for most people participating) would be pushing for court packing and term limits if there were 9 sitting SCOTUS Justices who were established liberal Democrats prior to appointment and their previous rulings all leaned that way prior to nomination? In order for liberals to be justified for court packing and terms limits as a method TO SERVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, it would mean they would still be for court packing and term limits even if 9 sitting SCOTUS Justices were established liberals.
ACB's entire hearing and confirmation process was completely politicized. That's how she paid for it. She was not questioned on her legal career as qualification nor actual ability to serve the American people, but as part of some partisan **** measuring contest. That Garland didn't even get his shot was one of the worst things I've seen in modern American history.
I said my peace on this. I'd like to see a course correction to account for what happened to Merrick Garland. I don't see how packing the court or term limits helps. I see it as letting people with specific agendas try to break the one branch of government that was never meant to be politicized.
Once the "You Cheated, So I'm Justified In Cheating, Let's All Cheat, Let's Change The Rules To Cheat, Let's Just Change Everything That Doesn't Fit Our Agenda Given The Time And Place And The Future Be Damned" mantra is accepted, then open bloodshed is just another pathway for some to get what they want.
Good luck. You are a fellow FBG. We don't have to agree politically to wish each other safety and good health in this pandemic.