Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
You had to go back to April to find an example? Sheesh. And Earl Sparrow was not a random tweet with a personal anecdotal story (which is what you accused me of doing here). It related to the discussion in the thread at the time - people were talking about the Starbucks manager's 911 call and he jokingly facetiously speculated how the call actually went down (he didn't claim he was reporting what an anonymous friend told him).parasaurolophus said:
The guys is pretty much acts like Trump. Figured Trump fans would secretly love the guy - he tells it like it is, a fighter, etc.
it’s convenient you don’t put much weight in Trump’s behaviors. We’ll just skip over the constant lies, crying, hypocrisy, and general awfulness of his act that we get on a weekly basis.
It's so freaking hypocritical to cherry pick specific actions by Dem supporters as proving the awfulness of the party but, when presented with daily evidence of the leader of the GOP outright lying, being disrespectful to Americans and others across the globe, numerous evidence of corruption and tax fraud and just generally behaving like a 6-year old would and it's brushed off like none of it matters. It only matters when the other side does it. And, if they acknowledge their own crappy behaviour they excuse it in the next breathe with a "whataboutism." It was horribly bad when a Den did something but when a Repub does it to a worse degree later it's okay cause "whatabouts." And the dolts lap it up.
I have actually seen him do a number of interviews where he came off quite well. Seems his online persona is not as good.
Certainly possible but no one exactly called him out after the interviews he gave to major media outlets about it.
I don't think @squistion would try to beat you to repeating such an awful source, but maybe you should tag him the next time you try to troll him.
@Joe Bryant: are you really looking for trolling references? Because referencing someone without out tagging their replies is about as troll as it gets.
I don't think you understand what trolling is. It's funny you've complained about me for years and claim to have me on ignore but you know every single thing I post. I don't understand.
I didn't even reply to Squistion. I am addressing you going after me, something you've been doing for a few years here. I'm not trolling anyone.
I’ve got to say I am glad he has been shooting him self in the foot lately. I really don’t want him around very far into the Democratic primary.
... but yeah this is not someone to be cheered if he runs for office. He won his client’s case against Trump. So he did a good thing. And there’s no doubt he is enjoyable in a Trumpian visceral sense but people shouldn’t be trusting him any further than whatever he says in the four square walls of a courtroom.
This probably kills off his political career. Unless he switches parties, in which case he jumps to the front of the pack for 2024.
I am sure you are aware that both Avenatti and Svetnick were demanding an FBI investigation into her charges before the GOP pushed through the Kavanaugh nomination, so they obviously got nothing to fear from the FBI looking into this (however Grassley will probably be facing the law of unintended consequences).
That's a lot worse than I expected. I just assumed Grassley was grandstanding by referring this for possible prosecution. That makes a lot more sense now.
It doesn't sound like he is too concerned.
He is. That tweet is a smokescreen. Doesnt address the clear lies that he was a part of.squistion said:
Of course you can't. Based on your posting history, one would not expect otherwise.
