Manafort is a guy DJT hired (who is now going to spend quite a bit of time in a federal penitentiary, likely die there & had upwards of 40 million plus confiscated due to his criminality,) then DJT hired Calk on Manaforts suggestion, with a list of jobs Calk himself provided that he would be fine doing. This doesn't bother conservatives, Republicans, DJT supporters? It doesn't reek of swampiness?Calk made a list of positions he desired. Among them, Treasury Secretary, Deputy Treasury Secretary, DoD Secretery, Commerce Secretary, or more than a dozen possible ambassadorships.
CNN
Federal prosecutors in New York on Thursday unsealed an indictment charging the former CEO of a bank with approving loans to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort in exchange for an administration position.
-NBC NYC
WASHINGTON — Representatives of at least 22 foreign governments appear to have spent money at Trump Organization properties, an NBC News review has found, hinting at a significant foreign cash flow to the American president that critics say violates the U.S. Constitution.
The extent and amount of foreign spending at Trump's hotels, golf clubs and restaurants is not known, because the Trump Organization is a private company and declines to disclose that information. Trump promised to donate any profits from foreign governments, and the Trump Organization has sent $343,000 to the U.S. Treasury for 2017 and 2018. The company did not release underlying numbers to support that figure.
Amid two lawsuits accusing Trump of accepting illegal foreign payments, NBC News sought to compile the most comprehensive possible list of foreign spending at Trump properties based on information in the public record. In June 2018, a report by the watchdog group Public Citizen came up with 10 foreign governments that had spent money at Trump venues. More information has since become public.
...
Trump-owned properties — including his D.C. hotel and his Mar-a-Lago golf club — have been the frequent recipients of foreign money.
According to news accounts and other public records:
At least nine foreign governments were involved in hosting events at a Trump property: Afghanistan, Cyprus, Ireland, Japan, Philippines, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Turkey
At least nine foreign governments rented or purchased property in buildings or communities owned by Trump businesses: Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, China, Malaysia, Slovakia, Thailand, India and the European Union.
Representatives of at least five foreign governments — Georgia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Romania and Saudi Arabia — have stayed at a Trump property.
Foreign governments have improved infrastructure in a way that benefited Trump properties in Indonesia and Panama.
At least eight foreign governments or their representatives attended parties or gatherings at Trump properties: Brazil, Dominica, Georgia, Nigeria, Russia, Turkey, Malaysia and Qatar
An event at the Trump International Hotel in Washington last May exemplifies the risk of a conflict of interest, or the risk of an appearance of such a conflict.
A delegation from the Mediterranean island nation of Cyprus hosted a "Justice for Cyprus" conference at the hotel. The group opposes Turkish influence in a breakaway region of Cyprus once occupied by the Turkish military.
The purpose of the gathering, as first reported by journalist Zach Everson, was described in a report in the Cyprus News Agency, which gets funding from the government. The group was examining "ways of exerting influence on US President Donald Trump with a view to avert the Islamization of the Turkish-occupied part of Cyprus," the report said.
In February, the investigative reporting site ProPublica observed that Nigerian presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar and his entourage were staying at the Trump Hotel in Washington, despite Abubakar reportedly having been barred from the U.S. for his alleged involvement in corruption while he was Nigeria's vice president.
And last week, The Washington Post reported that a wealthy Iraqi sheikh who was trying to influence the Trump administration spent 26 nights in a suite at the hotel at an estimated cost of tens of thousands of dollars.
In a court ruling last year denying Trump's motion to dismiss an emoluments lawsuit, a federal judge in Washington, Peter Messitte, raised the seminal question: When "a President maintains a premier hotel property that generates millions of dollars a year in profits, how likely is it that he will not be swayed, whether consciously or subconsciously, in any and all of his dealings with foreign or domestic governments that might choose to spend large sums of money at that hotel property?" ...
You think market value is always the same as tax assessments?Trump's Beverly Hills mansion was assessed at last year: $8.3 million. Price Trump's Indonesian business partner secretly paid for it a couple of weeks ago: $13.5 million.
. Those numbers seem about right actually. But Trump!You think market value is always the same as tax assessments?
>>>Trump’s company sells California mansion to firm linked to Indonesian billionaire, a business partner LinkTrump's Beverly Hills mansion was assessed at last year: $8.3 million. Price Trump's Indonesian business partner secretly paid for it a couple of weeks ago: $13.5 million.
. Those numbers seem about right actually. But Trump!
Going to need to go ahead and bold and italicize that.
The housing market must be red hot right now.Trump's Beverly Hills mansion was assessed at last year: $8.3 million. Price Trump's Indonesian business partner secretly paid for it a couple of weeks ago: $13.5 million.
Fitting that a park for him is just mud rocks and hills that the state let grow over because it’s useless land.I’ve always wondered what the backstory to this state park was...guess I know now...so Trumpian
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/failed-trump-golf-course-turned-into-dilapidated-n-y-state-park?srnd=premium
Pete Seeger Useless Overgrown ParkI’ve always wondered what the backstory to this state park was...guess I know now...so Trumpian
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/failed-trump-golf-course-turned-into-dilapidated-n-y-state-park?srnd=premium
I’ve always wondered what the backstory to this state park was...guess I know now...so Trumpian
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-14/failed-trump-golf-course-turned-into-dilapidated-n-y-state-park?srnd=premium
Despite the purchase price of $2.75 million, and a county assessment of $5.5 million at the time of the donation, Trump’s 2016 campaign said in a list of charitable donations published by The Washington Post that the land was worth $26.1 million.
"lies covered in brambles, mud and rocks"Fitting that a park for him is just mud rocks and hills that the state let grow over because it’s useless land.
"An hour’s drive north of Manhattan, Donald J. Trump State Park is what New York euphemistically calls a "passive park," meaning it has no trails, picnic tables or other amenities. The state stopped maintaining it in 2010, and the land lies covered in brambles, mud and rocks. A bill pending before the state legislature would change the name of the park to honor the folk singer Pete Seeger instead of the current president.""lies covered in brambles, mud and rocks"
Sums him up pretty well too.
This is one of the first reasons why I started disliking Trump. As a small business owner I can't stand his business practices and how he treats people. He's a terrible person.Sounds familiar...
Miller added that he billed the Trump Organization a seven-figure sum for his work on the land as well as his work on Trump National Golf ClubWestchester in Briarcliff Manor, New York. Trump’s company paid him all but $140,000, and after fighting for several months to get the balance, Miller said he finally accepted Trump’s personal offer of a discounted membership at the Briarcliff Manor club in lieu of payment.
Because this is the most damning indictment of the Trump presidency. Violation of the emoluments clause is strictly forbidden in the US constitution. Even Trump's most ardent supporters usually fashion themselves as pro-constitution, so they ignore it, or more likely, don't even know about or understand it. Fox, Hannity and Rush ignore this stuff, which means in his supporters minds it just isn't happening. If it isn't happening, the talking points don't get issued and repeated ad infinitum.It's quite amazing to me that THIS thread has had as little traffic as it has. Probably the most blatant and damning of all his actions and nary a peep.
This was always the area I thought they'd use to get him. Though, I am beginning to wonder if anything matters anymore with the Conway revelation and his flat out saying he'd take intel from a foreign government to help him win an election.Because this is the most damning indictment of the Trump presidency. Violation of the emoluments clause is strictly forbidden in the US constitution. Even Trump's most ardent supporters usually fashion themselves as pro-constitution, so they ignore it, or more likely, don't even know about or understand it. Fox, Hannity and Rush ignore this stuff, which means in his supporters minds it just isn't happening. If it isn't happening, the talking points don't get issued and repeated ad infinitum.
This is what I emailed my US Representative and Senators about when I encouraged them to begin impeachment proceedings. That was nearly two years ago.
A federal judge told US House and Senate Democrats they can begin collecting financial evidence this week about Donald Trump's businesses for a lawsuit.
Judge Emmet Sullivan, of the US District Court in Washington, denied an attempt by the Justice Department to stop the Democrats from collecting information from the Trump Organization and to appeal early court decisions in the lawsuit, which tests the constitutionality of Trump's business holdings while he serves as President.
The case is one of several avenues Democrats have to get to Trump's financial records.
Sullivan said the group of more than 200 members can begin collecting evidence June 28 through late September. Previously, the members of Congress said they plan to seek both documents and depositions from the Trump Organization. ...
All Fake News. The man is a choir-boy.Is there an aspect to Donald Trump that isn't highly likely to be corrupt? I'm serious.
Political relationships? Russia?
Personal friendships? Epstein? Manafort? Gates? Stormy Daniels?
Charity? Trump foundation?
Family? Kushner clearances/debt?
Businesses? Trump University?
I mean, what in this man's life stands up to scrutiny?
The court’s ruling, however, centered on whether the plaintiffs had standing to bring their case against the president — not the merits of whether Trump is violating the Constitution with his business dealings. The 4th Circuit issued two rulings Wednesday — one dismissing the case against the president in his official capacity and the other in his individual capacity.
- The Constitution has several measures designed to enforce ethical government but I have no idea how the courts expect anyone to enforce them with rulings like this. It's mystifying. If no one has standing to enforce the Constitution then how can it be enforced?The three judges on the panel that heard oral argument in March were nominated to the bench by Republican presidents — Niemeyer by President George H.W. Bush, Shedd by President George W. Bush and Quattlebaum by Trump. Frosh and Racine have said they would consider appealing for a rehearing by a full panel of the 4th Circuit and would not be surprised to see the case reach the Supreme Court.
True, he should be booted on conflicts of interest alone. But early on in his reign, I heard a very convincing argument (can’t remember the details) that while he may be guilty, it is very unlikely anything will come of it. It’s also way, way under-reported. Anyway, looks like he gets a pass, given the recent ruling.It's quite amazing to me that THIS thread has had as little traffic as it has. Probably the most blatant and damning of all his actions and nary a peep.
Trump administration ignores 16 subpoenas.
for the record, this is definitely not accurate in all locales.Of course tax value and market value are typically different. What's not typical is that just one year after assessment the gap between market value and assessed value is that large.
oooooof
You're lucky...here in Florida, those taxes are assessed every time the house is sold and set at the sales prices of the house. The first year in this house I paid the taxes based on what the value prior to sale to us. The second year I started paying taxes based on what I paid for it. It almost tripled by taxes. Of course, this is a primary source of income in this state for the local governments. We don't have a state income tax, but man, it was a jolt.for the record, this is definitely not accurate in all locales.
Property taxes are normally based on millage (a tax rate per $1000 of assessed value) and the assessed value. Particularly in areas where they don't re-assess frequently, it is not always feasible to get the assessed value up to the market value without raising taxes by an insane amount, as there may also be rules around how much you can change the millage. My property was re-assessed a year or 2 ago and is still about 40% of market value.
yeah, that's the thing about property taxes, it's all very locally-specific.You're lucky...here in Florida, those taxes are assessed every time the house is sold and set at the sales prices of the house. The first year in this house I paid the taxes based on what the value prior to sale to us. The second year I started paying taxes based on what I paid for it. It almost tripled by taxes. Of course, this is a primary source of income in this state for the local governments. We don't have a state income tax, but man, it was a jolt.
Proposition 13 limits increases in assessed value to no more than 2 percent per year until the property has a change in ownership or any new construction is completed at which time the property must be reassessed. The assessed value is the full cash or market value at the time of the purchase plus the incremental market value of each subsequent new construction. This proposition was approved on June 6, 1978 and took effect as of July 1, 1978.
Although your assessed value may only increase no more than 2 percent per year, the amount of your taxes may increase by a higher percentage for a number of reasons. The tax rate in your area can change as new bonds are added or decrease as bonds are paid off. Direct assessments/special charges can also cause an increase or decrease as they are added or removed. These special charges are added to the tax bill by local districts and cities. A sewer assessment is a typical special charge that is added to the tax bill.
California is very regressive when it comes to real estate, which is where much of the state’s wealth comes from.I think they're trying to kill prop 13 too. Don't see the old folks voting for that though.
It applies to commercial property as well. Put it in a trust or LLC and you are golden for generations.yeah, that's the thing about property taxes, it's all very locally-specific.
Also just saw this on the LA County Assessor's website:
The President has openly, in front of everyone, broken more than one federal law. I doubt, sadly, anything happens at all. Then again, breaking laws and getting away with it must make Trump smarter than everyone. Shameful.
Wonderful! No joke, it's about time.
Lutherman2112 said:Please note, preliminary results.
Air Force says it sent crews to Trump’s Scottish resort up to 40 times
That sounds to me like the Air Force is having to review (and maybe adjust) its own policies. This shouldn't be their problem, but it is because Trump refused to divest. His bad decision is having a negative affect on the Air Force and probably other government agencies that require travel.But the Air Force did concede that the appearance of staying at the president’s posh property might create a negative perception, and it has launched an internal review that will assess the “guidance associated with the use of civil airports and lodging selection for aircrew at en route locations,” according to a memo issued Monday.