Instinctive
Footballguy
Now 0.6. Another XP? FG seems more likely.
I'm with you albeit in another league but I'd take a 30 yd reception.I’m barely hanging on. Really need a couple Hopkins receptions.
Still alive with a 185 but lost Gordon with the MCL and already thin at RB with only drafting 4. Still happy to be here.Still alive, but with a healthy share of byes. Feeling some hope knowing most of the field also has Mahomes on bye too, but I have to rely on some heavy Broncos offense tomorrow to sneak by.
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/contest/2018/108973.php
Finished 10 points above the cut....moving on to week 13!My team is still alive and has only been close to the cut once (week 10, survived by 5 points). The 50% cuts for the next two weeks are going to be brutal! And the Rams/Chiefs bye this week make things even more interesting. I have Mahomes and Gurley...
I feel your pain! I was kicked to the curb last week by 0.4cjack said:Missed the cut by .15. Damn.
I've tried 2 in the past and can't see myself doing that again. It's like karma says, "Oh, only 2 QBs? Let's time the injury to QB 2 so that it coincides with QB 1's bye." I'd have been eliminated this week with Dalton's injury during Goff's bye without the timely appearance of Tannehill.BassNBrew said:Two has won more often than not, three will work. When you get to four, you would have been better off point wise with 2 more Ds and Ks to throw at the dart board. Things may skew this year with all the cheap QBs generating good numbers.
You're trying to beat 15000 people in a game, things are going to have to break your way to win. I'm pretty sure you could find places spending that Carr money could have gotten you that 0.4 of a point you needed.2 QB is too big a risk IMO. Injury, Bye weeks, and bad matchups all had me using 3 QBs. I hit on 2 of the 3 (Carr wasted $), but unless you find the low cost paydirt (Mahones), it is a challenge to balance the positions. I made the mistake of "middle of the road RB's" who just did not perform well enough.
The fact only 3 QB's missed time is a little less than average IMO. No data, just going on memory.
#250 this week was 186.25, and that's with KC and the Rams on bye with all their high-scorers. I think 180 is a minimum, and I won't feel comfortable unless I'm at 200.Last 4 years cutline for week 13.
2014 161
2015 181
2016 161
2017 165
Average 167
With scoring up this year, I’m thinking we are looking at a high 170 or 180 cut this week.
I finished in 176th with 194 points. I too rely on Gordon. And Fournette (since he came back). Both out this week, plus I'm missing OJ Howard and Will Fuller for the rest of the season and they were big contributors.chet said:I'm at 202 which is close to my highest score of the year. But I'm a MG owner so my prospects are dim for week 13. That being said, this is by far the farthest I've ever made it so I've got that going for me.
ETA: I'm in 202nd spot and have 186 points. I'm on a 4hr plane ride and misread the webpage after several drinks. Sorry if I misled anyone.
3? This week alone, Smith, Trubisky, Darnold, Flacco and Dalton missed time.2 QB is too big a risk IMO. Injury, Bye weeks, and bad matchups all had me using 3 QBs. I hit on 2 of the 3 (Carr wasted $), but unless you find the low cost paydirt (Mahones), it is a challenge to balance the positions. I made the mistake of "middle of the road RB's" who just did not perform well enough.
The fact only 3 QB's missed time is a little less than average IMO. No data, just going on memory.
Yep, or if dipwad Shurmur wouldn’t have completely ignored Barkley in the second half this week.I feel your pain! I was kicked to the curb last week by 0.4
For some reason it hurts more when it's close..... you consider all the "what if" scenarios.... even if somebody had just fell forward!
I have Zeke and TannyI'm surprised to see there are only 38 teams left with Zeke, and only 3 with Zeke and Kelce. That's a couple of potentially huge scorers with low ownership, so I'm hoping they're my difference makers (even though I'm one of only 11 Tannehill owners left, I doubt he'll be the guy).
BTW, I'm one of the 18How many Zeke + CMC + owners left? 23 How many Zeke + CMC + J. Conner owners left? 18
I likely need all three of these guys to be huge down the stretch to make up form deficiencies at QB (only Winston) and WR (shotgun approach works during the "regular season" but is limiting during the finals).
Thanks..... I knew it sounded bad when I read it after posting... while I am not sure Flacco or Darnold count.....but I see your point....3? This week alone, Smith, Trubisky, Darnold, Flacco and Dalton missed time.
Not to mention Jimmy G.Thanks..... I knew it sounded bad when I read it after posting... while I am not sure Flacco or Darnold count.....but I see your point....
I was thinking specifically Wentz early, Smith & Trubisky.
Mullens, Lindsay and Arnold weren't options available. No live teams have Adams. 2 teams have RichardIs this the time to look at some "flyers" who could provide some separation?
Candidates to Monitor: (not sure of their %) Players values have changed based on injury or trades.....
QB: Clev Mayfield; Buf J Allen; SF N Mullens
RB: Den Lindsay; Oak J Richard; Phi J Adams
WR: Car DJ Moore; Det Galladay; Dal A Cooper
TE: Ten J Smith; LAR G Everett; NOS D Arnold
No, With 500 teams left, soon to be 250, everyone's roster is unique enough to have separation.Is this the time to look at some "flyers" who could provide some separation?
Candidates to Monitor: (not sure of their %) Players values have changed based on injury or trades.....
QB: Clev Mayfield; Buf J Allen; SF N Mullens
RB: Den Lindsay; Oak J Richard; Phi J Adams
WR: Car DJ Moore; Det Galladay; Dal A Cooper
TE: Ten J Smith; LAR G Everett; NOS D Arnold
That may be true, but are there players with low % of ownership that have started to perform above expectations? Players who were taken as flyers and are now in key roles due to injuries, trades or based off of performance?No, With 500 teams left, soon to be 250, everyone's roster is unique enough to have separation.
I was a Mahomes/Gurley/Barkley owner, but I was doomed this week by .15 points. Ugh!Only 5 Brees/Gurley owners and 1 Brees/Gurley/Barkley owners, which is me.
Funny, I just went back to look at how I was eliminated (due to the MNF LAR/KC FF Feast!) Week 11 ....If Lambo could hit a 40 yard field goal i'd still be in. Ah well, was a great year. Always take 3 kickers, lesson learned.
50% of all remaining teams bit it this week. Not surprising that guys on bye were slightly more likely to do so.55% of the remaining Mahomies bit it this week
Like Chubb and Lamar Jackson? Cause I drafted both just for that late season pop.That may be true, but are there players with low % of ownership that have started to perform above expectations? Players who were taken as flyers and are now in key roles due to injuries, trades or based off of performance?
I guess this could be looked at like a "WW Target" ownership question.