Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I’m sure you read this all as you surely pay the subscription fee for Law.com <eyeroll>. On a serious note reading about this elsewhere my impression is Ellis wants the government to get this over with. They have heaps of evidence about lavish lifestyle and properly seized evidence in squirrel nests.
No one is forcing you to come into this thread if you find the subject matter of the Manafort trial so boring. It might be best that you do not click on this thread link in the future.
Judges are ornery. Especially fed court judges. They snipe at lawyers all the time. Its not a huge deal. At least it doesn't seem like what the judge said today was a huge deal without having been there.
Quoted for when this forum is screaming at the sky about Trump going after his opponents.
Tony Podesta can be drawn and quartered and all you’ll hear is “boy, that guy definitely should have just bought a hot dog stand.”
It’s the usual talking point...the judge totally beat Mueller down (remember the same posts in pretrial issues where Trump fans boasted the same things)
Quoted for when team trump finally decides they've beaten the "but Hillary" horse, not only to death, but into tartare. And serves it on some ostrich skin plates, because they're lavish af.
This particular judge is not amused with trial lawyers, but what you're pointing at is a demonstration of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which were aptly explained a page ago.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
Is it possible that you think that Tony Podesta and John Podesta are the same person? Because that would explain why the above post makes no sense.
Team Trump understands that if their orange god wanted to order the investigation of Hillary that he keeps crying about that he could do it, right? But that Trump doesn't care about facts; he cares about perception.
I feel like Br’er Rabbit.
One Christmas Eve I was stuck on a bus heading from Lake Tahoe to the Reno airport that was stopped due to an accident for 5 hours, plus another 2.5 for the actual trip once we got moving again. The bus had TV's and played a bootleg version of Song of the South with Japanese subtitles on an endless loop. There was a guy who had lost all of his money at the casino (except for whatever he spent on the cocaine he was clearly using too much of) and was going to miss his flight. My memory of this trip was this guy yelling incoherently on my left while I listened to "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah" on my right.
I didn't. And you have no idea what "i finished" means. I'm actually studying to be an orthodontist, and I finished analyzing all of the ways I would have done things differently to align her bite.
Now imagine he’s President. And it’s his daughter. And he keeps saying that for years, on television, including after she’s married.
If he's guilty...then he's guilty.NFL2DF said:
I think once you've decided that you want to bang your own daughter, her marital status is pretty much a non-factor.
Yeah, I've been before Judge Ellis. He's a stickler on this stuff. It means absolutely nothing to the merits (particularly where, as here, he's not the trier of fact).-fish- said:
Similar to the owner of the clothing company yesterday, Manafort's landscaper today testified that at least one invoice was a fake, that Manafort spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on landscaping, and that he was paid by international wire transfer from five different sources.
She also said she had no idea he had offshore holdings and testified that that would have been important information for her to know, since she kept his books and all.
If he sticks to the Trump administration's defense of "I forgot" he should be in the clear right?
I forgot to pay taxes on $60 million because I forgot to tell my bookkeeper about it. I thought I was broke, so I bought $1 million in suits and rented a party pad in Trump Tower. I'm not sure where the money came from. I guess I'm just lucky.
It doesn’t matter in general.
I get what they are trying to do but 3 days of it is overkill. Risk losing focus of the jury.
Many juries have no focus to begin with. That’s why some lawyers try to say the same thing 1,000 times and hope they heard it once.
I really wish I’d forgotten about $60 million.I don't see how a jury could convict him. We've all forgotten things
I feel that way sometimes reading this forum.
