Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I still can't take listening to him. One note Johnny, and not a good note.Sheriff Bart said:
What ever became of O'Reilly and Beck? Are they on a highway off ramp in some major city holding up a cardboard sign reading "Will bloviate for food"?
One beats women and the other asked a question on his radio show that I'm not even going to tiptoe around because the FBI wasn't amused.
My curiosity is peaked. I may have to look this up tonight, from my home computer. Surprised I missed the info here. Usually this stuff is well covered and I pick up on it, but I missed this or ignored it as both or more or less outside my area of real interest. Not unlike Hannity or Carlson. I bet I have been exposed to each less than 5 minutes in total the last year and that is only because it takes me a moment to page through channels and I do not actually skip Fox in my preloads so when climbing up it is on for a second or two before I move forward.
It was.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha so funny. Man, these republicans are hilarious. You have Dennis Miller, and Tim Allen, and Dennis Miller.
It was so obvious. Just saw this thread before the "reveal" a few posts down. There were Scooby Doo episodes that had more twists and turns.
This was an obvious troll from the very first second she started taking her jacket off. And what a stupid idea. Do they think, if it was true, people would blame AOC for it? Plus, it actually made AOC seem more sweet and loving etc for jumping on people who made fun of the troll.
I agree that this stupid stunt was completely counterproductive. All they did was make AOC look rational by comparison.
While I do agree with her that we have people in prison who do not belong in there. Non-violent, mental illness, poor, or drug charges and such. How is it a good idea to do away with prisons all together? This is what bothers me about her, she says we need have to conversation, makes a claim, offers no solution or clarification and then goes on the defensive about how people are attacking her.
I guess she took too much heat for the concentration camp analogy last time, moving on to 'American apartheid'.
So what do we do with murderers? Rapists? Child Molesters? Is she saying abolish privately run prisons? Was she possibly misquoted?
I suspect that when she says “prison abolition” she means ALL prisons. Just a hunch though.
This is a thought I would seriously want her to unpack a little. She certainly doesn't mean let violent offenders run amok...I am confident of that, so what the heck is she thinking here?
Ok so not eliminate..but reduce. Makes a little more sense. the 4th bullet is political gibberish, which of course is nothing new, but that's the unpacking I was looking for.
Trump and Cortez should work together. Trump can buy Greenland and Cortez can ship all the violent prisoners there to live.
Of course:
If this were to happen, no doubt she would support programs to help with job assistance and/or to retrain these folks.
These all seem reasonable. I'm glad there are politicians talking about fixing our ####ed up criminal justice system.
I hope you are not suggestion continuing our problem of mass incarceration for employment reasons...
Oh, I agree.
I don't think government should guarantee something like that. But this is probably a hypothetical debate for another day.
There also shouldn't be gangs and rape in jail either and the government should be responsible for that crap
There also shouldn't be gangs and rape in jail either and the government should be responsible for that crap
Agreed! Seems like we are on the same page for ending private prisons and rape in jail!
