IMHO the world should be putting more effort into making green business models the most profitable and sustainable - and watch them being copied and implemented all over the world, particularly in developing countriesUS reduction would be more if not for right wing resistance. I find it interesting when the right takes credit for what the left does as a sign of reasonableness to prevent additional progress.
When the Trump administration dismantles the EPA the right really has no leg to stand on.
With that said certainly the world should be putting more pressure on China and India to curb emissions and take economic sanction actions if they don’t.
America is doing this, not the right or left. I would argue we would be a lot better off if we focused a decade ago on building nuclear power plants. The EPA is not the reason we have reduced green house gases. Trump is not really the voice of the right.US reduction would be more if not for right wing resistance. I find it interesting when the right takes credit for what the left does as a sign of reasonableness to prevent additional progress.
When the Trump administration dismantles the EPA the right really has no leg to stand on.
With that said certainly the world should be putting more pressure on China and India to curb emissions and take economic sanction actions if they don’t.
Could have fooled me. They fall in line lock-step with every idiotic thing that comes out of his mouth or twit account. Party over country. Way over.America is doing this, not the right or left. I would argue we would be a lot better off if we focused a decade ago on building nuclear power plants. The EPA is not the reason we have reduced green house gases. Trump is not really the voice of the right.
And AOC speaks for everyone on the left. Commie over country. Am I right? The lock-step/idiotic/anticountry/over generalization rhetoric is not what we want.Could have fooled me. They fall in line lock-step with every idiotic thing that comes out of his mouth or twit account. Party over country. Way over.
As has been pointed out numerous times. AOC is very popular on the left - that is true. However, she was elected to represent 700,000 people in NYC. She got 100,000 people to vote for her. Donald Trump is the president of the United States and has near unanimous support from republicans across the country and has congress in his back pocket. So while there may be republicans like you that do not fall completetly in line, you are in the very tiny minority.And AOC speaks for everyone on the left. Commie over country. Am I right? The lock-step/idiotic/anticountry/over generalization rhetoric is not what we want.
Just one hour ago he thanked the Republicans for his 95% approval rating. On the other hand just 6 months ago a poll showed AOC with a 21% approval rating.As has been pointed out numerous times. AOC is very popular on the left - that is true. However, she was elected to represent 700,000 people in NYC. She got 100,000 people to vote for her. Donald Trump is the president of the United States and has near unanimous support from republicans across the country and has congress in his back pocket. So while there may be republicans like you that do not fall completetly in line, you are in the very tiny minority.
Apparently 21% is enough support to indicate all the left falls in line lock-step with her views.....right? Such BS from the right. If just a few on the right would grow a freakin pair of balls.....seriously, man up and admit when DJT is way over the line.Just one hour ago he thanked the Republicans for his 95% approval rating. On the other hand just 6 months ago a poll showed AOC with a 21% approval rating.
Oh, they will, if he loses in 2020, it'll be like no one ever voted for him or supported anythingApparently 21% is enough support to indicate all the left falls in line lock-step with her views.....right? Such BS from the right. If just a few on the right would grow a freakin pair of balls.....seriously, man up and admit when DJT is way over the line.
According to Snoopes there was no such poll which showed AOC at 21 percent. And Trump has never been at 95 percent among Republicans. Normally in the 80-90 range. And Republicans and the right are not really the same thing. But that was not the point. The point was it was a terrible post which was neither productive or conducive to good discussion.Just one hour ago he thanked the Republicans for his 95% approval rating. On the other hand just 6 months ago a poll showed AOC with a 21% approval rating.
Actually there was and it was mentioned in the AOC thread several times (surprised you missed that!). IIRC it was done by a couple of college kids with a PAC who went door to door in her district. The sample size was small and unscientific (only people who were home and willing to participate) Also, the methodology left a lot to be desired.According to Snoopes there was no such poll which showed AOC at 21 percent. And Trump has never been at 95 percent among Republicans. Normally in the 80-90 range. And Republicans and the right are not really the same thing. But that was not the point. The point was it was a terrible post which was neither productive or conducive to good discussion.
Who needs to grow balls and what does that have to do with climate change?Apparently 21% is enough support to indicate all the left falls in line lock-step with her views.....right? Such BS from the right. If just a few on the right would grow a freakin pair of balls.....seriously, man up and admit when DJT is way over the line.
Who needs to grow balls and what does that have to do with climate change?
The answer to your first question is in the post you quoted. I have bolded it for you. HTHWho needs to grow balls and what does that have to do with climate change?Apparently 21% is enough support to indicate all the left falls in line lock-step with her views.....right? Such BS from the right. If just a few on the right would grow a freakin pair of balls.....seriously, man up and admit when DJT is way over the line.
Who on the right would improve climate change if they grew balls?The answer to your first question is in the post you quoted. I have bolded it for you. HTH
DeflectionWho on the right would improve climate change if they grew balls?
Deflection from your sexism? Asking you a legit question since you brought up balls here. Weird.Deflection
It is odd that you should ask. Again the answer is in the original post you quoted.Who on the right would improve climate change if they grew balls?
It's an election year after allThe flip flopper strikes again: https://theweek.com/speedreads/888638/trump-now-says-climate-change-serious-not-hoax
He's only a few decades late to the party and still passing legislation that speeds up climate change. How can you take someone seriously when they go from saying something is a hoax to saying it's serious? Total incompetence.
https://twitter.com/lffriedman/status/1215395697643675650?s=21The flip flopper strikes again: https://theweek.com/speedreads/888638/trump-now-says-climate-change-serious-not-hoax
He's only a few decades late to the party and still passing legislation that speeds up climate change. How can you take someone seriously when they go from saying something is a hoax to saying it's serious? Total incompetence.
These phrases always fascinate meFF Ninja said:The flip flopper strikes again: https://theweek.com/speedreads/888638/trump-now-says-climate-change-serious-not-hoax
He's really good at saying nothing while using a bunch of simple words, incomplete sentences, and gibberish.These phrases always fascinate me
"I'm a big believer in that word, the environment"
I believe it would be very hard to say something while using a bunch of simple words, incomplete sentences, and gibberish.He's really good at saying nothing while using a bunch of simple words, incomplete sentences, and gibberish.
He environments better than anyoneThese phrases always fascinate me
"I'm a big believer in that word, the environment"
Maybe with the exception of Barron. Other than cyber, that may be his best skillHe environments better than anyone
Any chance for precipitation? Just like to get the full weather forecast (not that it has anything to do with 'climate').
44 in Miami tomorrow.
Goldman Sachs spending $750 billion to help clients accelerate response to climate change.
44 in Miami tomorrow.
My target by 2030 is $900 Billion.Goldman Sachs spending $750 billion to help clients accelerate response to climate change.
They generally don't like to lose money...and probably knew it'll be 44 in Miami tomorrow long before you did.
https://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/sustainable-finance/index.html
God I hate this guy. He won't be on this Earth much longer so screw future generations. I only hope and pray this can get tied up in lawsuits until sanity is returned.Trump Removes Pollution Controls on Streams and Wetlands
"The new water rule will remove federal protections from more than half the nation’s wetlands, and hundreds of thousands of small waterways. That would for the first time in decades allow landowners and property developers to dump pollutants such as pesticides and fertilizers directly into many of those waterways, and to destroy or fill in wetlands for construction projects.
“This will be the biggest loss of clean water protection the country has ever seen,” said Blan Holman, a lawyer specializing in federal water policy at the Southern Environmental Law Center. “This puts drinking water for millions of Americans at risk of contamination from unregulated pollution. This is not just undoing the Obama rule. This is stripping away protections that were put in place in the ’70s and ’80s that Americans have relied on for their health.”
Mr. Holman also said that the new rule exemplifies how the Trump administration has dismissed or marginalized scientific evidence. Last month, a government advisory board of scientists, many of whom were handpicked by the Trump administration, wrote that the proposed water rule “neglects established science.”
-29 in Nome, Alaska today.Anyone up for some water skiing in Antarctica this weekend? Weenie roast and beach volleyball to follow. Let me know.
https://twitter.com/search?q=Antarctica&src=trend_click
Remind me, is it normally warm in those parts at this time of year?-29 in Nome, Alaska today.
Anecdotes have their place, but science isn't one of them:
44 in Miami tomorrow.
About time. I just dumped a truckload of half used paint cans and some other random garbage into a stream by my house. Now I have room to park my car in the garage.Trump Removes Pollution Controls on Streams and Wetlands
"The new water rule will remove federal protections from more than half the nation’s wetlands, and hundreds of thousands of small waterways. That would for the first time in decades allow landowners and property developers to dump pollutants such as pesticides and fertilizers directly into many of those waterways, and to destroy or fill in wetlands for construction projects.
“This will be the biggest loss of clean water protection the country has ever seen,” said Blan Holman, a lawyer specializing in federal water policy at the Southern Environmental Law Center. “This puts drinking water for millions of Americans at risk of contamination from unregulated pollution. This is not just undoing the Obama rule. This is stripping away protections that were put in place in the ’70s and ’80s that Americans have relied on for their health.”
Mr. Holman also said that the new rule exemplifies how the Trump administration has dismissed or marginalized scientific evidence. Last month, a government advisory board of scientists, many of whom were handpicked by the Trump administration, wrote that the proposed water rule “neglects established science.”
81 in Miami this week. Looks like global warming is back again.
44 in Miami tomorrow.
How right you are! I'd much rather get my info from a guy who spends as much time writing articles on "rock naming" and "edible desert plants" as he does on climate change...Another report uses NOAA data and easily debunks the global warming garbage promoted by the U.N.
https://wryheat.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/evidence-that-co2-emissions-do-not-intensify-the-greenhouse-effect/
Climate alarmists need to educate themselves. Otherwise they’re just shills for their own demise.