Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Climate change could very well lead to conflict that spirals out of control into a world war.
To me, warming one thing that could cause WW3. Too few resources for too many people in areas that are the worst affected. This is actually one of the areas I agree on, at least to some extent, with people generally to the left of me. It's going to be hard to address, and I don't know how you get China, India, etc. on board and to buy in.NREC34 said:
not sure I agree with "we need to fall in love" again, but nuclear should definitely have a place, especially in areas where solar/wind/hydro aren't ideal.
What’s the purpose of repeating this? You know what is meant. Seriously what are you attempting to prove?
Well, thankfully Idaho is shutting down 2 coal plants by 2025 - and perhaps by taking the steps now to be 100% clean energy - they might just move up their timeframe before we all go extinct.
We should all thank Idaho for giving us that extra 0.002 seconds of existence.
What was the purpose of AOC saying it in the first place?
The same UN that created the UNFPA that thrived on the created crisis of overpopulation in the '60s??
I’m not playing a round and round game where you won’t address what’s actually said and try to deflect with this type of stuff.
It’s really aggravating because Opie can engage in intelligent conversation when he wants to. But in this case it’s just deflect and mock, much like the President.
Since when does pointing out events of our past that should make you think about the present or the future, deviate from "intelligent conversation".
As you’re no doubt aware, it wasn’t the United Nations that wrote this latest report; it was done under their auspices by a large number of scientists with tremendous credibility on this subject matter. Their findings were very consistent with previous findings.
The UN had backing of scientists in the '60s when the UNFPA was formed to "do something" about the planet's overpopulation problem.
Last time...they make money if it exists.....that is their motivation.Last timeDo you have any specific refutation of what they wrote?
Do you believe that most scientists are willing to lie and fabricate false information for money, putting their lifelong professional reputations at risk, or does this only apply to climatologists?
What? It's never happened?
What will they say? Heck I’m wondering how they will keep warm what with the fossil fuel ban and or price hikes/rationing they envision. Hope it’s cold AND WINDY so at least a few wind mill churned dead birds will turn up and maybe the heat will kick on. LOL
well there are facts on the earth heating and cooling ........... WHY is the core question
I understand. Should have said man-made cataclysmic climate change alarmism to be more specific lol.
global cooling, hole in ozone layer, acid rain, forecasted worst year for hurricanes ........... humans seem to love Apocalyptic views on the future
I know. You would think the “science” would show that fracking is bad for our water supply and that the messiah would have stopped that while he was king. Seeing how they are the self proclaimed environmentally friendly party they should have been able to get at least a national aluminum can and plastic bottle return program established.
Yeah I believe there is a pouplar old book that uses a coming Apocalypse as a core tenant. Damn the name of that book escapes me though.
Since our internet posts will live forever, maybe just do a history and people who deny the issue get left out of the higher regions when the earth floods over?
Maybe you guys have more in common than you thought lolYeah I believe there is a pouplar old book that uses a coming Apocalypse as a core tenant. Damn the name of that book escapes me though.
Not sure which guys your referring too? Also I didn’t say I believe in said book, just pointing out the irony of it all.
Me too just being goofy. Actually would be cool if there were more things to collaborate and agree on between people but man the identity politics divide and conquer sure seems to be working
Me too. As a centrist I see the extremes on both sides and they are both doing the same thing yet are yelling at the other side about how crazy they are. It’s insanity really.
maybe the Beast is global warmingdkp993 said:Yeah I believe there is a pouplar old book that uses a coming Apocalypse as a core tenant. Damn the name of that book escapes me though.
You drive a car? You use electricity? You breath? You got us here too then. Trump is at least pushing nuclear power forward, which is currently the only viable option to eliminating greenhouse gas emissions.
Nice post. This was the most interesting part for me. Both parties agreed climate change is real and both taking substantive action.
