Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Don Quixote

Jamal Khashoggi - Journalist Killed in Saudi Consulate

Recommended Posts

I've been following this story since it happened (he contributed to the Washington Post, and I'm a subscriber to that).  I thought it might make sense to get a thread going as the story is evolving and getting more attention.

Quick summary is that Jamal Khashoggi (a journalist who has become a critic of the Saudi government) walked into the Saudi consulate in Turkey about a week ago, but never came out.  His fiancee was waiting outside for him.  He went in to get documentation so that he could get married.  He had gone in the week prior, and been told to return to the consulate at that time/date to pick up his paperwork.

Reports are saying that a 15-person team flew in from Saudi Arabia, involving some intelligence personnel, and killed him in an operation ordered by top Saudi leadership.  An excerpt from a NY Times story with grisly details is below.  Interested to see what the response will be if the report is proven true. 

 

Quote

Turkish Officials Say Khashoggi Was Killed on Order of Saudi Leadership

ANKARA, Turkey — Top Turkish security officials have concluded that the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi was assassinated in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on orders from the highest levels of the royal court, a senior official said Tuesday.

The official described a quick and complex operation in which Mr. Khashoggi was killed within two hours of his arrival at the consulate by a team of Saudi agents, who dismembered his body with a bone saw they brought for the purpose.

“It is like ‘Pulp Fiction,’” the official said.

Saudi officials, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, have denied the allegations, insisting that Mr. Khashoggi left the consulate freely shortly after he arrived. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey has demanded that the Saudis provide evidence proving their claim.

It remains unclear how the Turkish government determined that Mr. Khashoggi had been killed, but the conclusion that the Saudi royal court ordered it could increase the pressure on both sides of the dispute. It would make it more difficult for the two governments to come up with a face-saving story blaming Mr. Khashoggi’s disappearance on some third party, on rogue elements of the Saudi security forces, or on an accident during an interrogation that went wrong.

Turkish officials have left things murky enough — speaking on condition of anonymity and refusing to publicly disclose their evidence — that such possibilities cannot be ruled out. Some pro-government news outlets have reported that the police were still investigating the possibility that Mr. Khashoggi was abducted, not killed.

But as more than a week has passed since he was last seen, the possibility that he is alive has dwindled.

The security establishment concluded that Mr. Khashoggi’s killing was directed from the top because only the most senior Saudi leaders could order an operation of such scale and complexity, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to disclose confidential briefings.

Fifteen Saudi agents had arrived on two charter flights last Tuesday, the day Mr. Khashoggi disappeared, the official said.

All 15 left just a few hours later, and Turkey has now identified the roles that most or all of them held in the Saudi government or security services, the official said. One was an autopsy expert, presumably there to help dismember the body, the official said.

Mr. Erdogan was informed of the conclusions on Saturday, according to several people with knowledge of the briefings, and he has since dispatched officials to anonymously tell myriad news outlets, including The New York Times, that Mr. Khashoggi was killed inside the Saudi Consulate.

But Mr. Erdogan himself has not publicly accused Saudi Arabia of killing Mr. Khashoggi. Nor has the Turkish president disclosed specific evidence to back up that allegation.

His reticence has raised questions about whether Turkey might ultimately back away from an explicit accusation in the interest of preserving relations with Saudi Arabia, a wealthy regional heavyweight. Mr. Erdogan may prefer not to alienate the kingdom as he struggles to manage a troubled economy and a many-sided power struggle over the outcome of the civil war in neighboring Syria.

A publication with close ties to Mr. Erdogan’s government, the newspaper Sabah, reported Tuesday that unnamed officials had said the police were examining the possibility that Mr. Khashoggi had been abducted and not killed, possibly with the help of another country’s intelligence officers.

The official who spoke about Mr. Khashoggi’s killing said that report and other similar ones were incorrect and were probably the result of the limited information shared among different agencies within the Turkish government.

The need to protect intelligence sources — which might include intercepted communications or human informers — also contributed to the government’s reluctance to reveal its evidence, the official said. That need for secrecy could also hamper any efforts to prosecute any Saudi agents involved....

 

Edited by Don Quixote
Updated thread title.
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not funny. Its quite ####ed up. But THIS is funny.

 

"Have you spoken to the Saudis?"

Pres. Trump: "I'd rather not say. But the answer is yes."

:lmao:

Edited by whoknew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if we are allowed to post entire NY Times articles but - 

 

Turkey Names Saudi Operatives It Says Killed Dissident Journalist

 

From the article - 

 

After days of noncommunication, Saudi officials on Tuesday began for the first time to contact Turkish counterparts for secret talks about resolving the matter, and the Saudis have told Washington that they believe they can smooth over the issue, according to both Turkish and American officials briefed on the discussions.

--

That does not sound good. Khashoggi is a US resident. I hope the Trump administration will get to the bottom of this and not just smooth it over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw a bit about this this morning. Very sad and super scary. Unfortunately we are the Saudi's #####es and we will do nothing and barely say anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, whoknew said:

I'm not sure if we are allowed to post entire NY Times articles but - 

 

Turkey Names Saudi Operatives It Says Killed Dissident Journalist

 

From the article - 

 

After days of noncommunication, Saudi officials on Tuesday began for the first time to contact Turkish counterparts for secret talks about resolving the matter, and the Saudis have told Washington that they believe they can smooth over the issue, according to both Turkish and American officials briefed on the discussions.

--

That does not sound good. Khashoggi is a US resident. I hope the Trump administration will get to the bottom of this and not just smooth it over.

I hope that is the case as well.  There are things that we can do -- such as stopping arms sales -- that the US could do.  I've seen some senators on both sides of the aisle call for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is obviously a very disturbing story with far reaching obligations.

It will be easy to blame Trump, but in truth our "alliance" with Saudi Arabia has been going on for decades, and all during that time they have been pulling this sort of crap. It's a dictatorship that treats its people very badly (particularly women and homosexuals) and will clamp down on any one who challenges the regime.  It's worth remembering, too, that all of the 9/11 terrorists originated from Saudi Arabia, and not from Iraq or Iran, as we always try to pretend.

The problem is, we need them. They're a big supplier of our oil, and they use the money they get from it not to improve the conditions of their own people but to buy weapons and aircraft from us, which we need to keep our aerospace industry going. Plus the awful fact that if we ever attempted to undermine the Saudi Princes, they would no doubt be replaced by an Islamist fundamentalist regime.

So knowing all this we will probably try to pretend that this little incident never happened.  And that sucks; it's infuriating.  Yet what would be a better alternative?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Don Quixote said:

I hope that is the case as well.  There are things that we can do -- such as stopping arms sales -- that the US could do.  I've seen some senators on both sides of the aisle call for that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_States–Saudi_Arabia_arms_deal

The most recent deal is 110 billion dollars.

You stop that deal, and our aerospace industry goes right into the tank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, timschochet said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_States–Saudi_Arabia_arms_deal

The most recent deal is 110 billion dollars.

You stop that deal, and our aerospace industry goes right into the tank.

Obama cancelled an arms sale to Saudi Arabia due to Yemen; so, it's happened in the fairly recent past.  But aren't some things bigger than economics anyway?  I don't let "but what would happen to Smith & Wesson's shareholders/employees" impact my thoughts on gun control, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Don Quixote said:

Obama cancelled an arms sale to Saudi Arabia due to Yemen; so, it's happened in the fairly recent past.  But aren't some things bigger than economics anyway?  I don't let "but what would happen to Smith & Wesson's shareholders/employees" impact my thoughts on gun control, for example.

I understand. But this isn’t Smith and Wesson we’re talking about. It’s a lot bigger than that, and it will affect whole communities. 

And perhaps it’s worth it anyhow. Perhaps we have to take a stand here. But we need to be aware of the consequences- all of them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

U.S. Intelligence has allegedly determined the Saudi crown prince ordered the operation. 

Where did you hear this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the article:

Quote

The intelligence about Saudi Arabia’s earlier plans to detain Khashoggi have raised questions about whether the Trump administration should have warned the journalist that he might be in danger.

Intelligence agencies have a “duty to warn” people who might be kidnapped, seriously injured or killed, according to a directive signed in 2015. The obligation applies regardless of whether the person is a U.S. citizen. Khashoggi was a U.S. resident.

 

 

A WaPo journalist.  That’s... doubleplus ungood. 

Edited by Henry Ford
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sinn Fein said:

Another detailed article - claims that Turkey officials know where and how Khashoggi was murdered, and might know where the body is buried.

 

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/exclusive-1433170798

Linked his Apple Watch to his phone and gave his phone to his girlfriend. Turkey claims to have video and audio of Saudis assassinating an American resident.  Wonder how this plays out.

Edited by Snorkelson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Snorkelson said:

Linked his Apple Watch to his phone and gave his phone to his girlfriend. Turkey claims to have video and audio of Saudis assassinating an American. Wonder how this plays out.

Exactly how you think it will.

If there is video/audio, the US will have to do something.  But, it will seem much harsher on paper than it will in reality.  We can't be upsetting Kushner's BFF.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Kushner declined to discuss the state of his relationship with Prince Mohammed. Behind the scenes, a person familiar with the matter said, he conveyed a letter from the publisher of The Post, Fred Ryan, to Prince Mohammed, expressing concern for Mr. Khashoggi and asking for his help. Mr. Kushner has also taken other unspecified steps, this person said.

Trump administration officials said there were still too many unanswered questions to draw any conclusions about what happened in Istanbul.

Mr. Trump signaled late Wednesday that he thought it was likely that the Saudis did kill Mr. Khashoggi and said that he would be upset if it was confirmed. “I would not be happy at all,” he said in an interview with Fox News. “I guess you would have to say so far it’s looking a little like that.”

But the president expressed reluctance to punish Saudi Arabia by cutting off arms sales, as some in Washington were proposing. “I think that would be hurting us,” he said. “We have jobs we have a lot of things happening in this country.”

 

This reads like Trump won't do much, and would not have done anything except that he (and everyone else) now knows that the Saudis did this - stupid video.  Kushner and Trump are in so far over their heads...

Edited by Sinn Fein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Sinn Fein said:

Mr. Kushner declined to discuss the state of his relationship with Prince Mohammed. Behind the scenes, a person familiar with the matter said, he conveyed a letter from the publisher of The Post, Fred Ryan, to Prince Mohammed, expressing concern for Mr. Khashoggi and asking for his help. Mr. Kushner has also taken other unspecified steps, this person said.

Trump administration officials said there were still too many unanswered questions to draw any conclusions about what happened in Istanbul.

Mr. Trump signaled late Wednesday that he thought it was likely that the Saudis did kill Mr. Khashoggi and said that he would be upset if it was confirmed. “I would not be happy at all,” he said in an interview with Fox News. “I guess you would have to say so far it’s looking a little like that.”

But the president expressed reluctance to punish Saudi Arabia by cutting off arms sales, as some in Washington were proposing. “I think that would be hurting us,” he said. “We have jobs we have a lot of things happening in this country.”

 

This reads like Trump won't do much, and would not have done anything except that he (and everyone else) now knows that the Saudis did this - stupid video.  Kushner and Trump are in so far over their heads...

I’ll pay more at the pump to do the right thing here. If there is video of them butchering an American resident and we keep selling them missles and aircraft then we have really lost our way. 

We were just told how much more the world respects us so much when Haley stepped down. Something like “they may not like the way we do things but they respect us now.” They do not. They see an opening on the chessboard and are moving, so is Russia, so is China, so is NK. We’re watching and being told how awesome they all are while pissing on our allies. Hope everyone’s 401k is doing well.

Edited by Snorkelson
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dinsy Ejotuz said:

Just to be clear... he's not American.  He's a resident, but not a citizen.

I edited my posts, but it doesn’t change how I feel. I think if any country murders a member of the press it’s a big deal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Snorkelson said:

I’ll pay more at the pump to do the right thing here. 

Again, you need to recognize that it’s not just paying more at the pump. It’s also a question of American jobs and industry. Plus the concern that if we destabilize the Saudi regime it benefits Iran, plus it threatens eventual replacement of that regime by Islamic fundamentalists. 

This is not necessarily an argument against “doing the right thing”. But we need to be aware of ALL of the consequences. Far too often we rush into this stuff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, timschochet said:

Again, you need to recognize that it’s not just paying more at the pump. It’s also a question of American jobs and industry. Plus the concern that if we destabilize the Saudi regime it benefits Iran, plus it threatens eventual replacement of that regime by Islamic fundamentalists. 

This is not necessarily an argument against “doing the right thing”. But we need to be aware of ALL of the consequences. Far too often we rush into this stuff. 

I’m not saying launch the missles, but we can put pressure on them to act appropriately. I’m sorry but I’m not quite as interested in saving the jobs of arms makers as much as in intrested I’m saving other industries. I’ll admit I’m being a little short sighted here. But video of dismemberment of anyone inside a consulate can’t be ignored. 

Id like to know what the motive is here assuming this is all true. If this was a spy, terrorist, or even some bob Levinson type grab I might understand, or chalk it up to the dirty business of running a government. I mean in levinsons case, we have an ex cia going into Iran and poking around, and he gets captured and imprisoned. It’s shady but I can see why it would happen. Was this retribution for some story he did or for digging he was currently doing? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Snorkelson said:

I’m not saying launch the missles, but we can put pressure on them to act appropriately. I’m sorry but I’m not quite as interested in saving the jobs of arms makers as much as in intrested I’m saving other industries. I’ll admit I’m being a little short sighted here. But video of dismemberment of anyone inside a consulate can’t be ignored. 

Id like to know what the motive is here assuming this is all true. If this was a spy, terrorist, or even some bob Levinson type grab I might understand, or chalk it up to the dirty business of running a government. I mean in levinsons case, we have an ex cia going into Iran and poking around, and he gets captured and imprisoned. It’s shady but I can see why it would happen. Was this retribution for some story he did or for digging he was currently doing? 

He was becoming a critic, particularly of the crown prince.  Mostly complaining about the repressive actions of the crown prince against his critics, that are, obviously, pretty accurate.  Washington Post put together a small collection of some of his columns.

In case behind a paywall, here's the first one from the collection:

Quote

When I speak of the fear, intimidation, arrests and public shaming of intellectuals and religious leaders who dare to speak their minds, and then I tell you that I’m from Saudi Arabia, are you surprised?

With young Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s rise to power, he promised an embrace of social and economic reform. He spoke of making our country more open and tolerant and promised that he would address the things that hold back our progress, such as the ban on women driving.

But all I see now is the recent wave of arrests. Last week, about 30 people were reportedly rounded up by authorities, ahead of the crown prince’s ascension to the throne. Some of the arrested are good friends of mine, and the effort represents the public shaming of intellectuals and religious leaders who dare to express opinions contrary to those of my country’s leadership. …

It was painful for me several years ago when several friends were arrested. I said nothing. I didn’t want to lose my job or my freedom. I worried about my family.

I have made a different choice now. I have left my home, my family and my job, and I am raising my voice. To do otherwise would betray those who languish in prison. I can speak when so many cannot. I want you to know that Saudi Arabia has not always been as it is now. We Saudis deserve better.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If U.S. intelligence knew he was being plotted against and didn't warn him, I want to see some people up on charges.  As high as the knowledge went.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im hoping for the best, correct response from the U.S. here but, I highly doubt it will be anything other than what paints DJT/Kush in the best possible light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

If U.S. intelligence knew he was being plotted against and didn't warn him, I want to see some people up on charges.  As high as the knowledge went.

Yup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

If U.S. intelligence knew he was being plotted against and didn't warn him, I want to see some people up on charges.  As high as the knowledge went.

Am I being too cynical to wonder if somebody in the Trump administration approved this action?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Insomniac said:

Am I being too cynical to wonder if somebody in the Trump administration approved this action?

I hope so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Insomniac said:

Am I being too cynical to wonder if somebody in the Trump administration approved this action?

I doubt there was approval, but MBS may have considered his relationship with Trump/Kushner close enough as a signal that there would be no or little repercussion for it.  Given some of Trump's comments about it that he doesn't want do anything that would hurt the US economy, MBS be right on that.

Edited by Don Quixote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, timschochet said:

This is obviously a very disturbing story with far reaching obligations.

It will be easy to blame Trump, but in truth our "alliance" with Saudi Arabia has been going on for decades, and all during that time they have been pulling this sort of crap. It's a dictatorship that treats its people very badly (particularly women and homosexuals) and will clamp down on any one who challenges the regime.  It's worth remembering, too, that all of the 9/11 terrorists originated from Saudi Arabia, and not from Iraq or Iran, as we always try to pretend.

The problem is, we need them. They're a big supplier of our oil, and they use the money they get from it not to improve the conditions of their own people but to buy weapons and aircraft from us, which we need to keep our aerospace industry going. Plus the awful fact that if we ever attempted to undermine the Saudi Princes, they would no doubt be replaced by an Islamist fundamentalist regime.

So knowing all this we will probably try to pretend that this little incident never happened.  And that sucks; it's infuriating.  Yet what would be a better alternative?

This is all pretty much exactly my sentiments, especially the bolded.  There's no good option for dealing with the Saudis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, we see where Trump's priorities are....

Abby D. Phillip
@abbydphillip

Trump indicates to reporters in the Oval moments ago that he opposes stopping arms sales to Saudi Arabia: "I don’t like stopping massive amounts of money coming into our country ... I don’t like stopping an investment of $110 billion in the United States."

11:52 AM - 11 Oct 2018

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ruffrodys05 said:

Im hoping for the best, correct response from the U.S. here but, I highly doubt it will be anything other than what paints DJT/Kush in the best possible light.

 

3 minutes ago, Don Quixote said:

Well, we see where Trump's priorities are....

Abby D. Phillip
@abbydphillip

Trump indicates to reporters in the Oval moments ago that he opposes stopping arms sales to Saudi Arabia: "I don’t like stopping massive amounts of money coming into our country ... I don’t like stopping an investment of $110 billion in the United States."

11:52 AM - 11 Oct 2018

Bingo!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Ruffrodys05 said:
2 hours ago, Ruffrodys05 said:

Im hoping for the best, correct response from the U.S. here but, I highly doubt it will be anything other than what paints DJT/Kush in the best possible light.

 

46 minutes ago, Don Quixote said:

Well, we see where Trump's priorities are....

Abby D. Phillip
@abbydphillip

Trump indicates to reporters in the Oval moments ago that he opposes stopping arms sales to Saudi Arabia: "I don’t like stopping massive amounts of money coming into our country ... I don’t like stopping an investment of $110 billion in the United States."

11:52 AM - 11 Oct 2018

Bingo!

Let's continue to allow the Saudis to kill civilians in Yemen 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/10/2018 at 1:07 PM, whoknew said:

This is not funny. Its quite ####ed up. But THIS is funny.

 

"Have you spoken to the Saudis?"

Pres. Trump: "I'd rather not say. But the answer is yes."

:lmao:

That is actually pretty funny.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, timschochet said:

This is obviously a very disturbing story with far reaching obligations.

It will be easy to blame Trump, but in truth our "alliance" with Saudi Arabia has been going on for decades, and all during that time they have been pulling this sort of crap. It's a dictatorship that treats its people very badly (particularly women and homosexuals) and will clamp down on any one who challenges the regime.  It's worth remembering, too, that all of the 9/11 terrorists originated from Saudi Arabia, and not from Iraq or Iran, as we always try to pretend.

The problem is, we need them. They're a big supplier of our oil, and they use the money they get from it not to improve the conditions of their own people but to buy weapons and aircraft from us, which we need to keep our aerospace industry going. Plus the awful fact that if we ever attempted to undermine the Saudi Princes, they would no doubt be replaced by an Islamist fundamentalist regime.

So knowing all this we will probably try to pretend that this little incident never happened.  And that sucks; it's infuriating.  Yet what would be a better alternative?

I'm not an expert, so I'm wondering if you or anyone else can help me with two questions I have here:

1.  Surely there are measures we can take that would make clear that this behavior won't be tolerated that fall short of undermining the current Saudi leadership to the point where a replacement would have an opening? If so, what would they be?

2.  I'm troubled by the description of this as a "little incident." All murders are tragic, but from a policy standpoint they are not at all equal. For example, murders where the perpetrator or the victim was on-duty law enforcement have a broader significance. We focus a spotlight on both of these, because failure to do so would have impacts far beyond a single loss of life. This seems to be to be one of those cases, yes? If Americans allow foreign powers to get away with murdering dissident journalists- including US residents working for US media- it silences dissent and the free press and empowers murderous regimes. Am I missing something?

Edited by TobiasFunke
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Insomniac said:

Am I being too cynical to wonder if somebody in the Trump administration approved this action?

My rudimentary understanding is that this was an rendition plot gone bad - with the drugs supposed to sedate Khashoggi, instead killing him.

If that were the case, I could see someone in the Trump administration either signing off on that plan, or at least promising to look the other way.  

It does appear that this has been nothing but keystone kops since it went down though.  Saudi's look bad - not just for the killing, but also for the cover-up.  We look bad, by allowing the Saudi's to cover it up - we are almost complicit in this by "demanding" that the Saudi's cooperate with the investigation, when it seems that everyone who needs to know what happened already knows what happened.

 

But, if we do nothing here - then what do we stand for as a nation?  Money is more important than human rights?  Sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dinsy Ejotuz said:

Just to be clear... he's not American.  He's a resident, but not a citizen.

Correct, If he was a citizen we'd have used a drone and done it ourselves. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, TobiasFunke said:

I'm not an expert, so I'm wondering if you or anyone else can help me with two questions I have here:

1.  Surely there are measures we can take that would make clear that this behavior won't be tolerated that fall short of undermining the current Saudi leadership to the point where a replacement would have an opening? If so, what would they be?

2.  I'm troubled by the description of this as a "little incident." All murders are tragic, but from a policy standpoint they are not at all equal. For example, murders where the perpetrator or the victim was on-duty law enforcement have a broader significance. We focus a spotlight on both of these, because failure to do so would have impacts far beyond a single loss of life. This seems to be to be one of those cases, yes? If Americans allow foreign powers to get away with murdering dissident journalists- including US residents working for US media- it silences dissent and the free press and empowers murderous regimes. Am I missing something?

1. I have no idea, which is why I posted what I did. I’m open to suggestions. But i predict we do nothing significant. 

2. You are not. My use of the phrase “little incident” was meant to be ironic, and a critique of how it will be treated. I agree with your perspective of its importance. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Sinn Fein said:

 

 

But, if we do nothing here - then what do we stand for as a nation?  Money is more important than human rights?  Sad.

At no time during our history have we ever been anything but extremely selective regarding our reaction to human rights violations both in this country and outside of it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, timschochet said:

At no time during our history have we ever been anything but extremely selective regarding our reaction to human rights violations both in this country and outside of it. 

Sad but true and it crosses political lines. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, timschochet said:

At no time during our history have we ever been anything but extremely selective regarding our reaction to human rights violations both in this country and outside of it. 

There are multiple examples of this in Latin America. FDR, regarding the first Somoza in power in Nicaragua, supposed said that he was an SOB, but he's our SOB. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Sinn Fein said:

My rudimentary understanding is that this was an rendition plot gone bad - with the drugs supposed to sedate Khashoggi, instead killing him.

If that were the case, I could see someone in the Trump administration either signing off on that plan, or at least promising to look the other way.  

It does appear that this has been nothing but keystone kops since it went down though.  Saudi's look bad - not just for the killing, but also for the cover-up.  We look bad, by allowing the Saudi's to cover it up - we are almost complicit in this by "demanding" that the Saudi's cooperate with the investigation, when it seems that everyone who needs to know what happened already knows what happened.

 

But, if we do nothing here - then what do we stand for as a nation?  Money is more important than human rights?  Sad.

If US Intelligence knew this guy was going to be kidnapped (or murdered) and did nothing to warn him then everyone involved in that decison needs to be sent to prison. Nothing of the sort will happen.  It really wouldn't surprise me if Trump himself gave the OK  just because the guy worked for the Washington Post. That'll show Jeff Bezos.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Insomniac said:

If US Intelligence knew this guy was going to be kidnapped (or murdered) and did nothing to warn him then everyone involved in that decison needs to be sent to prison. Nothing of the sort will happen.  It really wouldn't surprise me if Trump himself gave the OK  just because the guy worked for the Washington Post. That'll show Jeff Bezos.

I really, really don't want to believe that's even possible.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brian Klaas‏Verified account @brianklaas 10m10 minutes ago

Trump’s deep conflicts of interest & financial dealings with the Saudis “raises the disturbing possibility that Saudi Arabia will get away with the abduction or murder of a journalist because the president is beholden to Saudi money.”

My column:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/10/10/jamal-khashoggis-fate-casts-a-harsh-light-on-trumps-friendship-with-saudi-arabia/?utm_term=.c22d18cbd60f&noredirect=on

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.