Is he outkicking his coverage on this one? I was a little surprised when I saw thatCorey Booker is dating Rosario Dawson.
He should get at least a little bump in the polls for that, right?
I don't know about that. She's obviously beautiful, a very good actress. In interviews, she seems smart, quite pleasant, with a good sense of humor.Is he outkicking his coverage on this one? I was a little surprised when I saw that
Never really impressed with her imoIs he outkicking his coverage on this one? I was a little surprised when I saw that
I like Axelrod. He's interesting and his show is solid. I really enjoyed his interview with Tom Hanks for instance. But Jeb! is just so boring that this is the most exciting teaser quote he could find.“I think someone should run just because Republicans ought to be given a choice,” Bush said. “It’s hard to beat a sitting president, but to have a conversation about what it is to be a conservative, I think it’s important.”
I can't believe its not butter Beto.
.In the memo, the pollsters revealed that they’d tested two hypothetical three-way contests: Schultz versus Trump versus Harris, and Schultz versus Trump versus Warren. “Less than a week after the announcement” of his interest in running, read the memo, “he was already at 17 percent of the vote in both three-way match-ups.”
The part that they didn’t spell out: In both scenarios, Trump was narrowly winning.
And pull the old Killer B's routine in debates.Looks like the Democrats have drafted their Cornyn challenger: Joaquin Castro likely to challenge for 2020 Senate seat
He's a viable candidate and for those that don't know, this is Julian Castro's identical twin brother, so they should be able to double up on the campaign trail.
I hate Cornyn with all my soul. He is a ridiculous insider, sell-out, no position on anything, senior Senator who has accomplished absolutely nothing in the million years he's been a politician.Looks like the Democrats have drafted their Cornyn challenger: Joaquin Castro likely to challenge for 2020 Senate seat
He's a viable candidate and for those that don't know, this is Julian Castro's identical twin brother, so they should be able to double up on the campaign trail.
After what happened on the 2016 R side I’m still a little concerned about an Oprah-like run in a really crowded field. The difference being I think Biden and Sanders are more liked and qualified than Jeb and Marco were but nobody seems to be a lock and you can’t tell me that somebody with charisma and name recognition wouldn’t turn the heads of some folks over 76 year old Biden.Yang and Buttitigieg both seem like better candidates than Sanders, Warren, or Biden, but name recognition counts for so much, and they don't have it yet.
I also like Klobuchar (still), Booker, and O'Rourke.
I need to learn more about Harris, Hickenlooper, and Abrams (if she runs).
I am very glad that Oprah Winfrey, Michael Avenatti, Mark Zuckerberg, Hillary Clinton, and Eric Holder and are not running.
I don't know how a reasonable Dem can vote for Schultz and his opposition to single payer and higher tax rates on the wealthy. But it's out there and I have to accept it.I don’t remember what thread it was in, but a few people seemed not to understand how someone with strong support from 30%-40% of the voters would be more likely to win a three-way race than a two-way race.
Here’s this:
.
I believe 2028 is the year, too. Keep an eye on the I-35 spine, where Dems made huge gains in the most recent midterms.I hate Cornyn with all my soul. He is a ridiculous insider, sell-out, no position on anything, senior Senator who has accomplished absolutely nothing in the million years he's been a politician.
I've said it for 20 years, Texas is gonna be a blue state by 2028 and it changes U.S. politics forever. I may have actually underestimated my Cowboy friends, Texas could turn much sooner. The less Ted Cruzeseseseses and the less John Cornyninnnnsssss, the more our country operates like it should. Not even a R v D thing, Those Texas Senators are incapable of upholding the nature of a Democratic Republic. I expect this out of South Carolina, but not Texas.
I don’t know why his opposition to single payer and high top marginal rates would be obstacles in the general. First, those positions are plenty popular, well within the mainstream; they may even have majority support. Second, and more importantly, very few people in real life, as opposed to on internet message boards, seem to vote based on policy. They instead vote on personality and charisma (and of course party affiliation).I don't know how a reasonable Dem can vote for Schultz and his opposition to single payer and higher tax rates on the wealthy. But it's out there and I have to accept it.
I'm not sure what kind of assets his personality and charisma are for him. They appear to have yet to be revealed.I don’t know why his opposition to single payer and high top marginal rates would be obstacles in the general. First, those positions are plenty popular, well within the mainstream; they may even have majority support. Second, and more importantly, very few people in real life, as opposed to on internet message boards, seem to vote based on policy. They instead vote on personality and charisma (and of course party affiliation).
I don’t like Shultz’s personality. But if we’re comparing him to Trump and Warren? Yeah, I can see how he’d get 17% of the vote.
That isn’t exactly news. Trump didn’t win with just his base last time around either. He won because enough independents and Democrats in certain key states did not like Hillary Clinton and wanted to try something new.https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5c8c5c54e4b0db7da9f3758f/am
Fox New's Chris Wallace says there is now way Trump can win in 2020 with just his base.
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5c8c5c54e4b0db7da9f3758f/am
Fox New's Chris Wallace says there is now way Trump can win in 2020 with just his base.
This assumes a two-way race. It’s trivially easy to win with 40% in a legit three-way race (and easier still in a 27-way race, if you want to reductio ad absurdum out the math).“You can’t do it,” Wallace responded, “because there’s just not enough votes in the base.” Even with polling that indicates as much as 40 percent of eligible voters may be “ever-Trumpers,” that’s “not enough to win an election,” Wallace emphasized. “So he’s going to have to expand his base.”
lazyike said:
Fox New's Chris Wallace says there is now way Trump can win in 2020 with just his base.
That won't be enough, either. He needs converts of previous Dem voters.Well, way to state the blatantly obvious, Chris.
Wallace seems to think that Trump has somehow offended so many of his 2016 voters that they're all suddenly going to decide to vote Democrat in 2020.
FAT CHANCE.
Wallace should know better than this. He works for the network that successfully demonized Barack Obama. (I say that not in terms of making him as hated and as unelectable as Hillary was, but in terms of making him unsupportable to anyone who is the slightest bit conservative who also watches Fox News.)
The Trump voters who plugged their noses in 2016 will just plug their noses, cover their ears, and close their eyes in 2020. But they are absolutely still voting "R", no doubt about it.
I don’t see a 3 way race where the 3rd party candidate gets more than 2 or 3 %This assumes a two-way race. It’s trivially easy to win with 40% in a legit three-way race (and easier still in a 27-way race, if you want to reductio ad absurdum out the math).
(Also, Wallace obviously means actual voters, not eligible voters. If 40% of eligible voters pull the lever for Trump, he’ll win in a landslide.)
By all accounts, that base has gone from 35-37% down to 30%. It's baffling more people don't talk about it. I guess they think if they ignore it, it won't be true?https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5c8c5c54e4b0db7da9f3758f/am
Fox New's Chris Wallace says there is now way Trump can win in 2020 with just his base.
Based on what? Perot got 18.9%.I don’t see a 3 way race where the 3rd party candidate gets more than 2 or 3 %
Interesting. I don’t see any scenario where he wins, barring a Hillary comeback, and even then I’d bet on her.I don’t see Donald Trump losing at this point.
Well, I thought so too in 2016, but yet here we are. So I’ll need to see a strong candidate and good numbers first.Interesting. I don’t see any scenario where he wins, barring a Hillary comeback, and even then I’d bet on her.
Are you sure of these numbers? I haven’t read that. My understanding that Trump is supported by 38-43% of the population and that bottom number is extremely solid.By all accounts, that base has gone from 35-37% down to 30%.
I have not seen less then 41 percent. Do you have a link?By all accounts, that base has gone from 35-37% down to 30%. It's baffling more people don't talk about it. I guess they think if they ignore it, it won't be true?
To get to these numbers you have to include "republican" and "republican leaners" together. Pew and Gallup have data for you guys to peruse.Are you sure of these numbers? I haven’t read that. My understanding that Trump is supported by 38-43% of the population and that bottom number is extremely solid.
Even Donald Trump Jr disagrees with you.I'm convinced the extreme left is going to ruin it for the Democrats chances in 2020. Every week there's something in the news. Chelsea Clinton
? wow
I think Don Jr. was agreeing with GROOT. They were both criticizing the extreme left. (Not Chelsea.)Even Donald Trump Jr disagrees with you.
@DonaldJTrumpJr: It’s sickening to see people blame @ChelseaClinton for the NZ attacks because she spoke out against anti-Semitism. We should all be condemning anti-Semitism & all forms of hate. Chelsea should be praised for speaking up. Anyone who doesn’t understand this is part of the problem.
I like this guy. Therefore he has no chance.A true story about @PeteButtigieg.
Its a good party trick
Seriously though, there is a lot to like about Buttigeig - I might even have to start learning how to spell his name correctly...
Kind of cool the way the offspring of hated politicians support each other.Even Donald Trump Jr disagrees with you.
@DonaldJTrumpJr: It’s sickening to see people blame @ChelseaClinton for the NZ attacks because she spoke out against anti-Semitism. We should all be condemning anti-Semitism & all forms of hate. Chelsea should be praised for speaking up. Anyone who doesn’t understand this is part of the problem.
Ruh Roh....daddy's not gonna be happy about that sort of rebellion.Even Donald Trump Jr disagrees with you.
@DonaldJTrumpJr: It’s sickening to see people blame @ChelseaClinton for the NZ attacks because she spoke out against anti-Semitism. We should all be condemning anti-Semitism & all forms of hate. Chelsea should be praised for speaking up. Anyone who doesn’t understand this is part of the problem.
I’m sure it’s true. I’m completely sure that all of you Trump supporters are going to be extremely motivated.
Given the abysmal alternatives, I like his chances.I’m sure it’s true. I’m completely sure that all of you Trump supporters are going to be extremely motivated.
Here’s your problem, which Chris Wallace pointed out the other day: there’s just not enough of you. In order for Trump to win, you have to get centrists and independents to vote for him again. And that’s very unlikely at this point.
I heard one of the guys wrote a fiction story when he was 15 where people died !!&@$@#^!%!Given the abysmal alternatives, I like his chances.
Is that the hacker and drunk driver?I heard one of the guys wrote a fiction story when he was 15 where people died !!&@$@#^!%!