What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

2020: The Race For the White House - The Good Place (11 Viewers)

The problem is Bernie supporters did turn out for Hillary. Not all but then not all Hillary supporters turned out for Obama.  And can we stop the Bernie Bros bs? It was no more a thing than Obama boys which was also Hillary playing the victim of misogyny card. Jesus they barely changed it and people fell for it twice.
I know this....you know this.....

 
I didnt realize Buttigieg is gay (I have not followed him at all). I think we are at the point that most people wouldn't have a problem with a gay President.  That said, in this particular election,  I'm not feeling it. The tensions in this country around bigotry are so fraught at the moment that having a gay candidate in the general is just a massive problem waiting to happen. Can you imagine Trump talking about this guy? And his supporters eating it up and the crazy backlash against that, and then the even crazier backlash against the backlash? You think the racist/nazi stuff is out of hand, wait until you throw homosexuality into the mix. No thanks. This is already going to be an epic, divisive bloodbath.

That said, I am going to look into this guy because what little I know about him seems intriguing. 

 
Agreed.  But you can't do it with a hatred that makes your supporters view them as the enemy. As evil.  Bernie's supporters viewed Hillary as evil in 2016. You can't plug away month after month calling someone evil and then think they're going to miraculously think they're a decent candidate once you get beat. That's a big reason we have Trump now and will be a reason we'll have him in 2020.  I honestly think any candidate getting too selfish and dirty will be shunned by the part. I hope so. This isn't your average election. This is whether we want America or a Nazi version of it.
Yes, Bernie supporters coined Crooked Hillary.  Crazy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Today, Kamala Harris is going to tell a Houston crowd about the first major policy plan of her campaign, a massive federal investment in teacher pay — “largest in history,” according to a campaign aide. Campaign says more specifics  coming early this week.
Call me dumb but how does this actually benefit students?  I think we need a massive investment in education including teacher pay but teacher pay alone sounds like trying to buy votes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didnt realize Buttigieg is gay (I have not followed him at all). I think we are at the point that most people wouldn't have a problem with a gay President.  That said, in this particular election,  I'm not feeling it. The tensions in this country around bigotry are so fraught at the moment that having a gay candidate in the general is just a massive problem waiting to happen. Can you imagine Trump talking about this guy? And his supporters eating it up and the crazy backlash against that, and then the even crazier backlash against the backlash? You think the racist/nazi stuff is out of hand, wait until you throw homosexuality into the mix. No thanks. This is already going to be an epic, divisive bloodbath.

That said, I am going to look into this guy because what little I know about him seems intriguing. 
I’m not sure I agree. I think there would be immediately recognizable value to a lot of people in exposing those people for what they are. That’s a battle-already won for civilized people-I’d love to have. I don’t see it as a negative. It also further defines the odious nature of 35% of our population (if it was exploited as an issue). We need to stop deferring to that kind of thinking. Lets starkly outline what these people are about.

 
I completely forgot Biden voted for the Iraq war. :lmao:   If this guy is the Democrat candidate you guys should just pack it in now and focus on 2024. 

 
I’m not sure I agree. I think there would be immediately recognizable value to a lot of people in exposing those people for what they are. That’s a battle-already won for civilized people-I’d love to have. I don’t see it as a negative. It also further defines the odious nature of 35% of our population (if it was exploited as an issue). We need to stop deferring to that kind of thinking. Lets starkly outline what these people are about.
Haven't we already done that? The result has been a tsunami of broadly inflammatory accusations that serve little purpose other than to rile up conservatives that feel wrongly accused of the same sort of behavior that their leader engages in. For what? So Dems/ Libs can feel some sort of moral self-satisfaction?

I've seen this movie and it sucks. I have no appetite for a more obnoxious sequel. 

 
Haven't we already done that? The result has been a tsunami of broadly inflammatory accusations that serve little purpose other than to rile up conservatives that feel wrongly accused of the same sort of behavior that their leader engages in. For what? So Dems/ Libs can feel some sort of moral self-satisfaction?

I've seen this movie and it sucks. I have no appetite for a more obnoxious sequel. 
If they’re wrongly accused then “gay” as an issue won’t be an issue. And nothing to do with “moral self satisfaction”, everything to do with standards. Why should we sacrifice the idea of “gay” as acceptable to appease those who think otherwise? Screw that, that’s just submitting to antiquated thinking.

 
Agreed.  But you can't do it with a hatred that makes your supporters view them as the enemy. As evil.  Bernie's supporters viewed Hillary as evil in 2016. You can't plug away month after month calling someone evil and then think they're going to miraculously think they're a decent candidate once you get beat. That's a big reason we have Trump now and will be a reason we'll have him in 2020.  I honestly think any candidate getting too selfish and dirty will be shunned by the part. I hope so. This isn't your average election. This is whether we want America or a Nazi version of it.
Yes, Bernie supporters coined Crooked Hillary.  Crazy.
The phrase "Crooked Hillary" existed long before Sanders announced his candidacy. Here is an example from 2013 from what appears to be an ardent Sarah Palin supporter.

Also, Cambridge Analytica came up with the idea of using "Crooked Hillary" for the Trump campaign.

 
No, but the better educated people have no desire to go into or stay in teaching to earn 40k a year.
Really?  This just makes no sense to me plus being better educated doesn't lead to better teacher.  I know we all strive for people with PhD's teaching in elementary schools but I don't think it would be the best plan.  

 
If they’re wrongly accused then “gay” as an issue won’t be an issue. And nothing to do with “moral self satisfaction”, everything to do with standards. Why should we sacrifice the idea of “gay” as acceptable to appease those who think otherwise? Screw that, that’s just submitting to antiquated thinking.
I know what you're saying and in any other election cycle against any opponent other than Trump we would be in complete agreement. I have no desire to lower the standards or go backwards from a civil rights or social norms standpoint. But these are strange times.

 
Many parents complained here recently in Denver because of the high turnover rate of teachers at their kids schools. Kind of hard to keep teachers when the cost of living goes up but their pay is crap
I find it hard to believe they are moving careers over school districts.

 
It must, it's not an experience you can get any other way, and there are lessons learned and impact on character (good and bad) that are connected. But I always get leery when I'm picking up a feeling a candidate is implying their experience is the way - must be military, must be CEO, etc.

But also, I'd like to see the emphasis on the military toned down in general, and the message he was giving didn't make the think that would be likely if he was the guy.

I need to see/hear more of him to be certain, too early to draw a conclusion.
I watched an interview of him the other day.  The way he talked about the issues is very thoughtful, candid.  But his approach to Venezuela sounded like boilerplate American exceptionalism. 

Still, I like how well he can articulate and distill his positions.  He doesn't appear to be cut from the same cloth as the others.  

 
I’ve been listening to stuff about the electoral college situation and the news isn’t that great for Democrats. Even if Trump loses Michigan, loses Wisconsin, loses Iowa this time around, so long as he holds Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania he’s at 273. 

The governor and senate elections in Florida of 2018 suggest to me that Trump WILL win there. I would expect North Carolina as well. Which means this election all comes down to Pennsylvania. 

Which means Joe Biden may be the only candidate with a real shot at beating Donald Trump. 

 
What’s bizarre is that Trump will lose the popular vote by an even larger margin than last time. Texas and Georgia will be much closer, though both ultimately still red. 

But it sure looks like if Trump can hold on to Pennsylvania he wins a narrow victory. 

 
timschochet said:
I’ve been listening to stuff about the electoral college situation and the news isn’t that great for Democrats. Even if Trump loses Michigan, loses Wisconsin, loses Iowa this time around, so long as he holds Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania he’s at 273. 

The governor and senate elections in Florida of 2018 suggest to me that Trump WILL win there. I would expect North Carolina as well. Which means this election all comes down to Pennsylvania. 

Which means Joe Biden may be the only candidate with a real shot at beating Donald Trump. 
Weren't you saying Hillary was the only candidate who could beat Trump 3.5 years ago??

how about we let the process play out a bit before we declare winners and losers.

 
Weren't you saying Hillary was the only candidate who could beat Trump 3.5 years ago??

how about we let the process play out a bit before we declare winners and losers.
I was, and it was true. Of the candidates who ran for President on the Democratic side, Hillary was the only one who could have beaten Trump. 

 
timschochet said:
I’ve been listening to stuff about the electoral college situation and the news isn’t that great for Democrats. Even if Trump loses Michigan, loses Wisconsin, loses Iowa this time around, so long as he holds Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania he’s at 273. 

The governor and senate elections in Florida of 2018 suggest to me that Trump WILL win there. I would expect North Carolina as well. Which means this election all comes down to Pennsylvania. 

Which means Joe Biden may be the only candidate with a real shot at beating Donald Trump. 
GOP Congressional candidates got trounced by an aggregate 474,000 votes in Pennsylvania in the midterms. 

But your overall assessment is generally correct. Dems may win the national popular vote by twice the margin that Hilldog did and Donald could still sneak through with the EC, subjecting us to four more years of bragging about his second "landslide victory." Nice system we got here.

 
GOP Congressional candidates got trounced by an aggregate 474,000 votes in Pennsylvania in the midterms. 
I’m aware. It’s a hopeful sign. But two points:

1. There wasn’t a statewide race so we can’t predict the outcome like we can in Florida.

2. More importantly: those Democrats were very centrist. I know the guy in western Pennsylvania who won barely even mentioned Trump and promoted very few progressive ideas. A progressive candidate for President is unlikely to win in Pennsylvania. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nate Silver‏Verified account @NateSilver538 20m20 minutes ago

Jay Inslee has also qualified for the debates based on this morning's Fox News poll. That makes 12 qualified candidates: Biden, Sanders, Harris, O'Rourke, Booker, Klobuchar, Castro, Gillibrand, Buttigieg, Inslee (polls), Yang (fundraising).

 
timschochet said:
I’ve been listening to stuff about the electoral college situation and the news isn’t that great for Democrats. Even if Trump loses Michigan, loses Wisconsin, loses Iowa this time around, so long as he holds Florida, North Carolina and Pennsylvania he’s at 273. 

The governor and senate elections in Florida of 2018 suggest to me that Trump WILL win there. I would expect North Carolina as well. Which means this election all comes down to Pennsylvania. 

Which means Joe Biden may be the only candidate with a real shot at beating Donald Trump. 
I wouldnt count your NC chickens before they hatch. He won by a few hundred thousand and believe me the vote against him and Republicans in general is going to come out. This is why Tillis has moderated his politics of late.

 
I wouldnt count your NC chickens before they hatch. He won by a few hundred thousand and believe me the vote against him and Republicans in general is going to come out. This is why Tillis has moderated his politics of late.
It will be an uphill struggle. We have to figure that Florida and North Carolina are likely losses. 

Things might change, but we can’t count on it. What it comes down to is, and you’re not going to like it: I know you want a progressive candidate and given the base, you might very well get that. But this is not the year for it. If we go in that direction, I think we’re gonna lose. 

I know that you and every other progressive here are going to disagree with me. That’s fine. The establishment is corrupt and for your purposes, they suck. But it’s them or Trump. 

 
It will be an uphill struggle. We have to figure that Florida and North Carolina are likely losses. 

Things might change, but we can’t count on it. What it comes down to is, and you’re not going to like it: I know you want a progressive candidate and given the base, you might very well get that. But this is not the year for it. If we go in that direction, I think we’re gonna lose. 

I know that you and every other progressive here are going to disagree with me. That’s fine. The establishment is corrupt and for your purposes, they suck. But it’s them or Trump. 
Please, the most establishment politician ever lost here last time. People stayed home. Excite the kids and the minority voters or don't bother.

 
I wouldnt count your NC chickens before they hatch. He won by a few hundred thousand and believe me the vote against him and Republicans in general is going to come out. This is why Tillis has moderated his politics of late.
Your state continues to have the nation's best, most organized voter suppression tactics and the Republican dominated state legislature has even less of a collective conscience than their counterparts around the nation. Still, as time marches on, Republicans won't be able to win the state all the time without coming back towards the center, maybe a lot. NC can look one state north to see what can happen when a rural red state's urban centers continue to grow and gain power. I don't know if '20 is the year, though. Not yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your state continues to have the nation's best, most organized voter suppression tactics and the Republican dominated state legislature even less conscious than their counterparts around the nation. Still, as time marches on, Republicans won't be able to win the state all the time without coming back towards the center, maybe a lot. NC can look one state north to see what can happen when a rural red state's urban centers continue to grow and gain power. I don't know if '20 is the year, though. Not yet.
Gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential race or the Senate race. Just like we have a Democratic governor we can win this state for the right blue candidate. 

 
Gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential race or the Senate race. Just like we have a Democratic governor we can win this state for the right blue candidate. 
Nothing would please me more, electing a Dem governor was no doubt something that has scared Republican strategists for '20. And I think Tim is wrong about Florida, too. Despite the constant reinforcements of old voters, 1.2 million newly enfranchised voters (plus another 300,000 Puerto Ricans) can change things in a big hurry -- if the Dems can get them to the polls. Plus Florida (NC, too) is no less affected by the growing numbers of youth voters, who swing almost 30 points away from Donald Trump.

Still, the coming election remains a nail biter and the nightmare scenario -- an even bigger popular vote margin while The Don squeezes in with a ridiculously tiny EC majority -- looms large.

 
Please, the most establishment politician ever lost here last time. People stayed home. Excite the kids and the minority voters or don't bother.
Exciting the kids isn’t going to get us Pennsylvania. If you win California by an even bigger margin, so what? 

The system is rigged. If you want to unrig it I’m all for that. But we’re not going to do it by 2020 and we need to face that reality. 

 
Pennsylvania goes Democrat when white, blue collar workers vote Democrat. They want jobs, healthcare, infrastructure. They care about climate change but they don’t want to go too crazy over it. They don’t give a #### about Russia. They don’t like socialism. Someone like AOC, Bernie Sanders, or Liz Warren is going to turn them right off. 

Last time around they voted against Hillary, not because of her politics, not because she was Establishment, but because they didn’t like her and didn’t trust her. They liked what Trump said about jobs and decided to give him a chance. Now they’re sick of hearing about Trump so there is an opportunity to win them back. But only with a centrist. 

 
Pennsylvania goes Democrat when white, blue collar workers vote Democrat. They want jobs, healthcare, infrastructure. They care about climate change but they don’t want to go too crazy over it. They don’t give a #### about Russia. They don’t like socialism. Someone like AOC, Bernie Sanders, or Liz Warren is going to turn them right off. 

Last time around they voted against Hillary, not because of her politics, not because she was Establishment, but because they didn’t like her and didn’t trust her. They liked what Trump said about jobs and decided to give him a chance. Now they’re sick of hearing about Trump so there is an opportunity to win them back. But only with a centrist. 
You keep saying this like centrists haven't had their chance to prove it. They have,  they lost and they lost over a number of cycles not just the last one. Just stop already. 

 
No idea how far he can go, but if I could buy stock in Pete Buttigieg I'd do it.  For someone to come out of total obscurity and push into the 2nd tier of candidates so quickly is pretty impressive.
It's a lot easier to do what he's done so far, than to take the next step and go to 1st tier.

In my opinion, he'll do that if he can get into debates and perform well, especially discussing foreign policy.

 
You keep saying this like centrists haven't had their chance to prove it. They have,  they lost and they lost over a number of cycles not just the last one. Just stop already. 
How many general elections have the liberal wing of the Democratic Party won in the last 70 years?  Maybe Johnson in 1964 if you ignore the whole Vietnam thing?

I mean, who was the last one to even make it out of a primary?

The worm has turned for sure, but I'm not sure how you can point to recent history as an argument in favor of the more liberal wing of the party when it comes to elections.

 
No idea how far he can go, but if I could buy stock in Pete Buttigieg I'd do it.  For someone to come out of total obscurity and push into the 2nd tier of candidates so quickly is pretty impressive.
:goodposting:

I have gone from "He has no chance!" to telling everyone I know to take a listen to what he has to say.  Most impressive debut on a national stage, imo.

I am sure there are things I am missing  - but right now, I am buying what he is selling.

 
How many general elections have the liberal wing of the Democratic Party won in the last 70 years?  Maybe Johnson in 1964 if you ignore the whole Vietnam thing?

I mean, who was the last one to even make it out of a primary?

The worm has turned for sure, but I'm not sure how you can point to recent history as an argument in favor of the more liberal wing of the party when it comes to elections.
Centrist have been running the show since the Clinton years in the Democratic Party neoliberalism is what everybody was running with they really weren't any progressives running in any of those elections. Neoliberalism gave us the trumps of the world it's an abject Failure Its failure can be traced to the failure of systems all over Europe that followed it and in America why did workers turn on the Democratic party because the Democratic party turned on workers a long time ago. So why don't we give somebody else a chance since the establishment neoliberals lost all the state house has lost the Congress lost the Senate lost the presidency just generally lost. So stop pointing to them as some kind of success because they aren't and they haven't been for a long long time and in fact their policies have led us to where we are today Trump isn't the disease he's a symptom.

The only thing Barack Obama was good at was getting Barack Obama elected much losing everywhere else.

 
The only thing Barack Obama was good at was getting Barack Obama elected much losing everywhere else.
Lots of people rode his coattails during the general elections.

And laying the blame at his feet for that is partially valid, but the opposition was incredible.

 
We just disagree. 

I will support whomever the Democrats put up. Will you do the same? 
Depends on who they put up. This idea that I have no responsibility for what the person I vote for does no longer works for me. There are consequences to who I give power. I gave Obama power what did he do with it? He had American citizens assassinated, he authorized war crimes in the form of his drone program and he sold out the principles that I have because he was trying to make his deal with the people I didn't elect and elected him to fight. And whom he said he'd fight. 

 
Lots of people rode his coattails during the general elections.

And laying the blame at his feet for that is partially valid, but the opposition was incredible.
Basically the Centrist keep telling voters that the Republicans are right they just need to be nicer about it so why shouldn't the voters elect Republicans.

 
Depends on who they put up. This idea that I have no responsibility for what the person I vote for does no longer works for me. There are consequences to who I give power. I gave Obama power what did he do with it? He had American citizens assassinated, he authorized war crimes in the form of his drone program and he sold out the principles that I have because he was trying to make his deal with the people I didn't elect and elected him to fight. And whom he said he'd fight. 
I do admire your perspicacity. 

But for the sake of seeing Trump lose (my main, overriding objective) I sincerely hope there aren’t too many people who follow your lead. 

 
One last point about Florida: if Republicans were really confident about winning there in '20, then the state legislature might not be so anxious to construct the bill they are currently working on, which would require the recently re-enfranchised population to reimburse government for their court related costs before being registered to vote. Expect that one to be challenged in court, and maybe this is just another example of mainstream Republican voter suppression, but they wouldn't be doing it at all if they weren't worried about those 1.2 million new voters.

I know I'm repeating myself but making it harder to vote is a long term losing proposition for the Pubbies. More and more independent voters can clearly see the unfairness and partisanship of it.

 
One last point about Florida: if Republicans were really confident about winning there in '20, then the state legislature might not be so anxious to construct the bill they are currently working on, which would require the recently re-enfranchised population to reimburse government for their court related costs before being registered to vote. Expect that one to be challenged in court, and maybe this is just another example of mainstream Republican voter suppression, but they wouldn't be doing it at all if they weren't worried about those 1.2 million new voters.

I know I'm repeating myself but making it harder to vote is a long term losing proposition for the Pubbies. More and more independent voters can clearly see the unfairness and partisanship of it.
Also keep in mind Andrew Gillum is going to spend at least 3 million dollars in a get the vote out operation in Florida specifically targeted at the presidential election.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top