And DK Metcalf and AJ Brown. Now that is being really high on Bryan Edwards.Bryan Edwards several spots ahead of Mike Evans? That's a head scratcher for me.
I agree, but that's why people still rank him highly and Im sure you could snag some random 3rd for him maybe a 2? not sure...pedal him for another underachiever?Sunk cost fallacy
I think he would be a "potential buy" at WR #52, but that doesn't make me a "believer" per se.Corey Davis - what makes you still believe?
He didn't NOT produce, just not at an elite level. I'm chalking it up to 3 years of development because of coming from a small school. Along with Mariota his QB who is probably just a safer version of Alex Smith when it comes to taking chances. That says a lot to me. Pretty sure he had one of the highest separation rates by ANY WR this year as well. Needs a new situation, I'm still on board and I'll never quit. This might even be a conservative ranking.Corey Davis - what makes you still believe?
Deebo was 4 years does he suck? He also never really excelled in college any of his 4 years at the same school. It's the closest thing you'll find for apples to apples and yet Edwards had 1000 more yards than Deebo did his 4 years. I definitely downgrade senior WR's most of the time, and it is a slight red flag, but Edwards was that good on film. Plus a 17.7 breakout age doesn't hurt.Especially considering how he underachieved in college for all you stat heads Before you blame his QB, Edwards played four years. Also, if he is so good you have to ask why he played 4 years in college. For me that throws up a flag most of the time, but not always. In Edward's case it does because he never really excelled in college in any of his 4 years.
Edwards if you want, but I wouldn't touch him before the 2nd round of rookie drafts, probably late 2nd or 3rd.He didn't NOT produce, just not at an elite level. I'm chalking it up to 3 years of development because of coming from a small school. Along with Mariota his QB who is probably just a safer version of Alex Smith when it comes to taking chances. That says a lot to me. Pretty sure he had one of the highest separation rates by ANY WR this year as well. Needs a new situation, I'm still on board and I'll never quit. This might even be a conservative ranking.
Deebo was 4 years does he suck? He also never really excelled in college any of his 4 years at the same school. It's the closest thing you'll find for apples to apples and yet Edwards had 1000 more yards than Deebo did his 4 years. I definitely downgrade senior WR's most of the time, and it is a slight red flag, but Edwards was that good on film. Plus a 17.7 breakout age doesn't hurt.
I knew I'd get questions on Bryan Edwards and Mike Evans ha. Edwards is a beast, my favorite WR in this years draft besides Higgins. He does everything well, dominant in college even though his stats don't show it. His market share was good, but people point to the counting stats to say he sucked. He didn't. Just from watching him, what gave me confidence was he sinks the best out of all the WR's from this class that I went through (other than Reagor). For a big guy, that was impressive. He was their primary option a lot of the time, bad QB, Deebo opposite and Edwards still outproduced him overall in college across their 4 years.
I do find it funny that the controversy is Edwards at 14, but if I put Jeudy there, nobody would question it. Edwards is better than Jeudy in every way.
I think Godwin took over as the #1 on that offense. They can support 2 WR's so Evans might be a bit low here, but with the QB question looming I'm being a little conservative on Evans. Still bullish on Godwin though. Younger and all. Downgraded Evans for being 26 (27 by season start), even though that's prime production usually, I heavily favor the youth side of things in startups. If I didn't favor the youth so much, Evans would likely lead the tier at 14.
I wouldn't put any of these rookie WRs over Evans but that's just me. Evans should have 4 more years of prime play left. He has been a WR1 in 4 of 6 seasons, has been durable and his 16 game career average is 82/1291/9. He has done it with multiple QBs. I get that things change, the future of the QB spot is uncertain and Godwin commands targets but there is no way I am putting a player who is a total projection over a multi year Pro Bowler in his prime.He didn't NOT produce, just not at an elite level. I'm chalking it up to 3 years of development because of coming from a small school. Along with Mariota his QB who is probably just a safer version of Alex Smith when it comes to taking chances. That says a lot to me. Pretty sure he had one of the highest separation rates by ANY WR this year as well. Needs a new situation, I'm still on board and I'll never quit. This might even be a conservative ranking.
Deebo was 4 years does he suck? He also never really excelled in college any of his 4 years at the same school. It's the closest thing you'll find for apples to apples and yet Edwards had 1000 more yards than Deebo did his 4 years. I definitely downgrade senior WR's most of the time, and it is a slight red flag, but Edwards was that good on film. Plus a 17.7 breakout age doesn't hurt.
I knew I'd get questions on Bryan Edwards and Mike Evans ha. Edwards is a beast, my favorite WR in this years draft besides Higgins. He does everything well, dominant in college even though his stats don't show it. His market share was good, but people point to the counting stats to say he sucked. He didn't. Just from watching him, what gave me confidence was he sinks the best out of all the WR's from this class that I went through (other than Reagor). For a big guy, that was impressive. He was their primary option a lot of the time, bad QB, Deebo opposite and Edwards still outproduced him overall in college across their 4 years.
I do find it funny that the controversy is Edwards at 14, but if I put Jeudy there, nobody would question it. Edwards is better than Jeudy in every way.
I think Godwin took over as the #1 on that offense. They can support 2 WR's so Evans might be a bit low here, but with the QB question looming I'm being a little conservative on Evans. Still bullish on Godwin though. Younger and all. Downgraded Evans for being 26 (27 by season start), even though that's prime production usually, I heavily favor the youth side of things in startups. If I didn't favor the youth so much, Evans would likely lead the tier at 14.
He produced less than he did last year when his qb was Mariota/Gabbert. I don't think you can even use the qb excuse anymore when brown did so well with tannehill.He didn't NOT produce, just not at an elite level. I'm chalking it up to 3 years of development because of coming from a small school. Along with Mariota his QB who is probably just a safer version of Alex Smith when it comes to taking chances. That says a lot to me. Pretty sure he had one of the highest separation rates by ANY WR this year as well. Needs a new situation, I'm still on board and I'll never quit. This might even be a conservative ranking
That's probably fair and more in line with conventional ranking. I use to like Evans a lot and lately I've soured on him. Maybe he just isn't flashy anymore with Godwin taking over. He's definitely a value on my list here, and probably deserves to be higher. I'm just not sure his volume will be there anymore and I question what that will turn him into if there's no Winston at QB.I wouldn't put any of these rookie WRs over Evans but that's just me. Evans should have 4 more years of prime play left. He has been a WR1 in 4 of 6 seasons, has been durable and his 16 game career average is 82/1291/9. He has done it with multiple QBs. I get that things change, the future of the QB spot is uncertain and Godwin commands targets but there is no way I am putting a player who is a total projection over a multi year Pro Bowler in his prime.
I mean he kind of broke out in his 2nd year, then AJ Brown comes in. Not that Brown actually took over, he just made splash plays from the slot, lots of players do that honestly. Tannehill never liked throwing outside a whole lot even in Miami, which is why Landry had his insane usage there from the slot. It transitioned to Tennessee to a new slot guy in AJ Brown. That's not an indictment on Tannehill or Brown, just a QB not comfortable with outside throws as often. I think he needs to be more physical and just have a dominant attitude (which doesn't seem to be in him), but I also think he needs a new situation that will utilize him better than the Titans can.He produced less than he did last year when his qb was Mariota/Gabbert. I don't think you can even use the qb excuse anymore when brown did so well with tannehill.
Through Week 14, Godwin had 112 targets and Evans had 118. And that includes the single target Evans got before his season-ending hamstring injury.That's probably fair and more in line with conventional ranking. I use to like Evans a lot and lately I've soured on him. Maybe he just isn't flashy anymore with Godwin taking over. He's definitely a value on my list here, and probably deserves to be higher. I'm just not sure his volume will be there anymore and I question what that will turn him into if there's no Winston at QB.
I don't disagree, but this a dynasty ranking. Godwin by default gets the nod rather easily over Evans for age purposes. The trouble as you are pointing out is who actually is the #1. I'm betting on Godwin, others might bet on Evans. I don't think either are a bad option. My worries purely lie with Evans' ability to be a target hog with a potentially new QB, and if he isn't can he be efficient with the touches he will eventually get? I don't know those answers and that's what keeps me away from having Evans higher for dynasty purposes.Through Week 14, Godwin had 112 targets and Evans had 118. And that includes the single target Evans got before his season-ending hamstring injury.
I don't think there's any logical conclusion to be drawn about who will out-target who going forward.
If you want to separate them based on age, that's completely understandable. There's effectively a 3-year difference there.
FWIW, I wanted to argue your comment that Godwin supplanted Evans as the #1 this year, and I can't do it (completely). In the games they both played the difference between them was essentially the game that Evans put up a big fat zero. They did kind of go back and forth all season long in terms of who had more big weeks. By my count it was Godwin over Evans 5-4. Is that edge enough to draw a conclusion of off? Will that separation continue and be more significant in 2020? I certainly can't say. But I would rather have Evans in redraft this coming season only because Godwin will probably be about 1 round more expensive.
Why do you not have the same question for Godwin? Is he immune to target disruption with a new QB?My worries purely lie with Evans' ability to be a target hog with a potentially new QB, and if he isn't can he be efficient with the touches he will eventually get?
I don't have the same question about Godwin because he was efficient with his targets and he's more versatile than Evans, playing slot and outside.Why do you not have the same question for Godwin? Is he immune to target disruption with a new QB?
With what we know about Arians, I would be pretty surprised if Winston isn't the QB. He loves a guy who can air it out and I don't think there's an available QB that matches his play preference better than him. But for the sake of argument, let's say they bring in a new QB. That QB is going to be someone who fits the profile of previous Arians QBs, and he does love to throw downfield. That's Evans' wheelhouse.
I think I understand what you're saying now. Godwin had more catches on fewer targets, but also a far lower YPC. Evans was boom/bust and you're not willing to gamble on that continuing. Through 13 games in which they both played an were healthy, Godwin averaged 15.1 YPC and Evans was at 16.6. Godwin averaged 5.7 catches per game to Evans 5.1I don't have the same question about Godwin because he was efficient with his targets and he's more versatile than Evans, playing slot and outside.
Evans, though, had a sick amount of end zone and red zone looks. Evans was the go-to guy down there. Godwin outperformed his expected touchdowns. I think I've posted in the Evans thread about it should anybody want to bump it.I think I understand what you're saying now. Godwin had more catches on fewer targets, but also a far lower YPC. Evans was boom/bust and you're not willing to gamble on that continuing. Through 13 games in which they both played an were healthy, Godwin averaged 15.1 YPC and Evans was at 16.6. Godwin averaged 5.7 catches per game to Evans 5.1
Plus the age thing.
The only thing about that is that Godwin actually scored from inopportune places on the field last year. I think he had four touchdowns above what would be expected. Evans was below. Anyway, I edited my post so people can see you and I (heh) having the same discussion.From what we have seen so far, Evans is more boom/bust. He can be shut down and not catch any of those deep balls/RZ looks. Godwin seems more consistent because he's going to get slot targets, more things underneath.
Very fair concern. It's really a 50/50 call for me in seasonal.The only thing about that is that Godwin actually scored from inopportune places on the field last year. I think he had four touchdowns above what would be expected. Evans was below. Anyway, I edited my post so people can see you and I (heh) having the same discussion.
Do you really think Justin Herbert is a 4th round flier? Or you just don't draft rookie QBs?Last rookie update before dynasty rankings. There has been some movement as I got some heights/weight in's from the senior bowl. Plus I dove into some analytical aspects of these guys. I've also moved all my favorites to the top of their respective tiers at their position. They are ordered from RB - WR - QB - TE. Bolded players are my personal favorites so this is a little more reflective of how I'd rank them. Here are my current tiers based on my previous descriptions of talent.
Tier 1 - D'Andre Swift, Tee Higgins, Laviska Shenault, Joe Burrow
Tier 2 - JK Dobbins, Cam Akers, Jonathan Taylor, Bryan Edwards, Jalen Reagor, CeeDee Lamb, Jerry Jeudy, Tua Tagovailoa
Tier 3 - Elijah Mitchell, Zack Moss, Gabriel Davis, Antonio Gandy-Golden, Denzel Mims, Tyler Johnson, Quintez Cephus, Collin Johnson, Henry Ruggs, Justin Jefferson, Hunter Bryant, Jared Pinkney, Harrison Bryant
Tier 4 - Anthony McFarland Jr., Clyde Edwards-Helaire, Eno Benjamin, Michael Warren, Ke'Shawn Vaughn, Donovan Peoples-Jones, Brandon Aiyuk, Lynn Bowden, Michael Pittman Jr., Isaiah Hodgins, Brycen Hopkins, Cole Kmet
Tier 5 - Trey Sermon, AJ Dillon, Ty Chandler, Quartney Davis, Kalija Lipscomb, Marquez Callaway, John Hightower, Aaron Parker
That's all the ones of note, everyone else I've evaluated is a flier type that should be considered 4th round or later in rookie drafts. This is 45 players deep with limited QB's and TE's for now.
Carson is interesting because he is productive. I feel like Penny was the plan to replace him, that just didn't work out. I think they try to do it again. Plus the fumbles are a big issue, he'll get subbed in and out regularly, his value is capped in ppr, and the team seems like they want to throw more often now. All of that puts him at DND for me, but I realize this is probably a bit low for pure production. He is not a guy I want as an anchor or comfortable with as RB2 in a startup because he is so replaceable.Carson at 28? Maaaan. But you're certainly not alone. He's been top ten in my league the last two years. Dude's only 25. I'm cool with keeping him until he dies. He reminds me a lot of Ingram. Neither guy gets any respect, they just churn out points and win games.
This is more to help gauge startup value or trade value. I won't be drafting every rookie I have ranked, but if there's a guy I don't like at rookie 2.09 or whatever I can see what a fair trade for that pick would be. Gives me a nice glimpse into where their value is so that I don't overpay or get fleeced. For any pick.Thought provoking. If I were to make a general comment, I think rookies are way overvalued across the board. If the hit rates for a WR drafted first or second at his position only has a 40% chance of a WR1 season. And in general besides generational talents are coin flips at best. Basically all rookies are being ranked as if they have already hit. Most wont
Someone mentioned Chris Carson as an example. Phillip Lindsay goes for back to back 1k seasons and 2x pro bowls. He hit. That’s what you hope for. You probably have other reasons to rank him 30 DND, but it confuses me a bit
i think if you are looking beyond 2-3 years ahead in dynasty you miss the forest for the trees. Things change way too quick. In a lot of situations take the points and run will maintain more team value than the scratch tickets
Flip side is the different ways we evaluate risk/reward is what makes FF fun. There is no right way. You are managing variance and expected outcomes weighted in all sorts of different ways.
thanks for the effort
Good call on Bo Scarbrough and Bonnefon. Pretty sure I remember reading somewhere Patricia wants to use him and Kerryon in a committee going forward. He looked good last year. I put Ty in because of the plus pass catching but he might not be worth this ranking now that you've pointed out Scarbrough who I forgot about.Detroit.
High on Kerryon, but not his comparable to, if not better performing, teammate Bo. Did have Ty listed though.
Carolina.
Bonnafon just re-signed for the 2 spot?
Atlanta.
Ollison sticking with the team, or Hill that may not. Judge Ito?
Could get you to 100.
Never liked him as a prospect, I think his ceiling is capped so is his value. I would love to grab him in re-draft, but not long term dynasty. He is only 22 and a plus starter so maybe I'm wrong with this one.so 2nd year player devui Singletary is a dnd? based on you think buffalo drafts a replacement this year or next? curious because i really like what i saw at the end of the year
I don't do much evaluating of QB's and now that there's top10 hype around Herbert he should be in that list. Definitely worse than Joe and Tua though. I'd probably put him in Tier3 just gut reaction. That rookie list is talent based from me watching them in game-cut ups. I don't do that for QB's or TE's and use more generic ones that I insert into my own thoughts on WR's and RB's.Do you really think Justin Herbert is a 4th round flier? Or you just don't draft rookie QBs?
I get not wanting to draft love, Eason or Fromm (even if I disagree) but leaving Herbert off looks like an oversight.
Year 0 or year 5 value is value. I look at Lindsay as the feature back in a run heavy scheme with a coach who wants to (and should) get him more passes in space. It will be year 3 of his rookie deal. Following year he will be in a contract year with at least 2x pro bowls possibly 3 in a hopefully ascending offensive situation. Year after that he will be trying to prove he earned his contract. That’s a pretty good 3 year window to invest in. Peak sell probably after his contract yearZyphros said:This is more to help gauge startup value or trade value. I won't be drafting every rookie I have ranked, but if there's a guy I don't like at rookie 2.09 or whatever I can see what a fair trade for that pick would be. Gives me a nice glimpse into where their value is so that I don't overpay or get fleeced. For any pick.
As for Phillip Lindsey, he's a smaller guy who doesn't catch that well. Limited ceiling, has his place for production but not a guy I want long term. Those guys are pretty easily replaceable. In a startup I want youth and versatility for most of my picks, those guys generally keep their value longer for trade purposes. If I need a RB3-4 on my bench that maybe I can use for bye weeks or something, sure, but that's all they'll be used for on my teams. Kind of the same as Carson situation wise, they wanted to get a bellcow in Freeman, and that just didn't work out, while Lindsey was the UDFA that showed out. Nice story, not a great long term dynasty buy.
By snap count, Lindsay was 50.3% and Freeman was 50.1%. He's not ascending anything. He's in a timeshare and he isn't very good at being in that. He's a little above replacement in terms of rushing, that's about all he has going for him. How do you know they want to get him more passes?Year 0 or year 5 value is value. I look at Lindsay as the feature back in a run heavy scheme with a coach who wants to (and should) get him more passes in space. It will be year 3 of his rookie deal. Following year he will be in a contract year with at least 2x pro bowls possibly 3 in a hopefully ascending offensive situation. Year after that he will be trying to prove he earned his contract. That’s a pretty good 3 year window to invest in. Peak sell probably after his contract year
coach speak blurb that came out recentlyBy snap count, Lindsay was 50.3% and Freeman was 50.1%. He's not ascending anything. He's in a timeshare and he isn't very good at being in that. He's a little above replacement in terms of rushing, that's about all he has going for him. How do you know they want to get him more passes?
Lindsay had 48 targets, 35 receptions for 196 (5.6 avg and 12.3 yards per game). He also had 6 drops
Freeman had 50 targets, 43 receptions for 256 yards (6.0 avg and 16 yards per game). He also had 2 drops
By these accounts Freeman is actually the better pass catcher, even though he's not good at it. Just because Lindsay is smaller doesn't make him a better COP back.
Sure, just highlighting the fact his 2-3 window looks good. the coach/GM could get fired, the line could continue to suck and he ends up a jag RBBC. Definitely in the universe of potential resultsI wasnt aware that this was common knowledge. First time I've ever heard of this concept. The previous points in this post were good ones, but the bolded is seriously reaching.
IMO his sell high may be right now or after this upcoming season
These are based on startup value and trade value in terms of the draft slot which I have them ranked at. For example Tee Higgins is my WR1, but value wise he's my 1.05 right now. So the players around his ranking are what I'd expect to receive if Higgins is on the board, and I wanted to trade the pick. Goes for both WR's and RB's.Thank you for your rankings. I apologize if you already touched on this but can you give the reasoning for ranking rookies so high (in particular the receiver side where historically those guys take longer to develop) over proven production (Evans, Adams, Diggs...etc) and even young production that has already shown great promise on the NFL field (AJ Brown, DK, Chark...etc)?
It just seems to be placing a large emphasis on new and shiny when historically the hit ratio on rookies has not been as high as your rankings indicate. Last year was a phenomenal year for rookie receivers playing well (well above average) and a lot of those guys are taking a backseat to this class.
Talent tiers from the first 1/2 of my post got sorted into my draft tiers (with my rules in place) which is the 2nd half of that post.Last rookie update before dynasty rankings. There has been some movement as I got some heights/weight in's from the senior bowl. Plus I dove into some analytical aspects of these guys. I've also moved all my favorites to the top of their respective tiers at their position. They are ordered from RB - WR - QB - TE. Bolded players are my personal favorites so this is a little more reflective of how I'd rank them. Here are my current tiers based on my previous descriptions of talent.
Tier 1 - D'Andre Swift, Tee Higgins, Laviska Shenault, Joe Burrow
Tier 2 - JK Dobbins, Cam Akers, Jonathan Taylor, Bryan Edwards, Jalen Reagor, CeeDee Lamb, Jerry Jeudy, Tua Tagovailoa
Tier 3 - Elijah Mitchell, Zack Moss, Gabriel Davis, Antonio Gandy-Golden, Denzel Mims, Tyler Johnson, Quintez Cephus, Collin Johnson, Henry Ruggs, Justin Jefferson, Hunter Bryant, Jared Pinkney, Harrison Bryant
Tier 4 - Anthony McFarland Jr., Clyde Edwards-Helaire, Eno Benjamin, Michael Warren, Ke'Shawn Vaughn, Donovan Peoples-Jones, Brandon Aiyuk, Lynn Bowden, Michael Pittman Jr., Isaiah Hodgins, Brycen Hopkins, Cole Kmet
Tier 5 - Trey Sermon, AJ Dillon, Ty Chandler, Quartney Davis, Kalija Lipscomb, Marquez Callaway, John Hightower, Aaron Parker
That's all the ones of note, everyone else I've evaluated is a flier type that should be considered 4th round or later in rookie drafts. This is 45 players deep with limited QB's and TE's for now.
As for an actual ranking, I use some rules to elevate RB's and devalue QB's and TE's. A RB from Tier3 is comparable to a WR from Tier2. A TE from Tier2 would be comparable to a WR from Tier3. A QB from Tier1 would be comparable to a WR from Tier2 (unless it's for 2 QB leagues which the tier remains). The tiers for my rankings are slightly different with that viewpoint so it get's broken down into Tier A, B, C, D, E, F which is pretty self explanatory (just call it a grade). Helps me find tier gaps easily in the rookie draft. With that being said here would be a top37 (weird number I know, but the rest is the last tier which doesn't need listing) ranking of these guys with those rules in place:
Tier A Draft Pick (1) D'Andre Swift, (2) JK Dobbins, (3) Cam Akers, (4) Jonathan Taylor, (5) Tee Higgins, (6) Laviska Shenault
Tier B Draft Pick (7) Bryan Edwards, (8) Jalen Reagor, (9) Elijah Mitchell, (10) Joe Burrow, (11) CeeDee Lamb, (12) Jerry Jeudy, (13) Zack Moss
Tier C Draft Pick (13) Gabriel Davis, (14) Antonio Gandy-Golden, (15) Denzel Mims, (16) Tyler Johnson, (17) Tua Tagovailoa, (18) Anthony McFarland Jr., (19) Clyde Edwards-Helaire, (20) Quintez Cephus, (21) Collin Johnson, (22) Henry Ruggs, (23) Justin Jefferson, (24) Eno Benjamin, (25) Michael Warren, (26) Ke'Shawn Vaughn
Tier D Draft Pick (27) Trey Sermon, (28) AJ Dillon, (29) Donovan Peoples-Jones, (30) Brandin Aiyuk, (31) Lynn Bowden, (32) Ty Chandler, (33) Hunter Bryant, (34) Michael Pittman, (35) Jared Pinkney, (36) Harrison Bryant, (37) Isaiah Hodgins
This is mostly based on their talent I perceive them at with some analytics sprinkled in to how I view a player. This would be the board that I use to draft from, but it's still incomplete. I need sizes/weights from the combine, and draft capital and landing spot from the NFL Draft, which allows players to move up/down a tier based on what they show and where they end up situation wise. So for example if Laviska Shenault weights in at 232 or something, doesn't impress in drills and lands in a terrible spot he could move down 2 tiers into Tier Group C. That's how I complete my rookie board's. And I use my rookie board to insert these players into my full dynasty rankings. This is about 1/3 of the way done.
Not downgraded (yet) just cautionary. I still like him a lot overall, but I don't quite see the ceiling anymore. Part of that is due to the Kenyan Drake comp's that are out there now, I see that a lot. It makes total sense, questions about how his workload being half and half with Holyfield and things like that is what makes me cautious.@Zyphros I thought Swift was being downgraded for you. Can you explain what made you put him back at the top?
I have to say, the order of your top 12 is very very similar to mine. Maybe 1 or 2 differences... makes me feel better about taking the position I am on these guys
Pretty average to me. I don't see a natural catcher, but he's not inadequate. His combine will clear that up a little bit. I think he's just average at catching, which likely makes him replaceable on those downs in the NFL. Just to compare to other RB's I think Swift is above average at catching and so is Dobbins. It might just come down to landing spot and projected usage in their roles. Akers on the other hand I think is special in that area.Hey Zyphros, what do you think of Taylor as a receiver?
That's where I have my doubts about him, based on his numbers. I wish there were video cutups based on type of play instead of by game so that I could just spend 20 minutes watching all 39 of his targets.
Major bummer but an NFL team could get a major steal.Former Gamecocks star Bryan Edwards breaks foot, will miss NFL combine https://t.co/sctHn8kN3H
mean he might slide in dyno rookie drafts too....lets just let him....Major bummer but an NFL team could get a major steal.
He should especially if his draft capital slips- it adds another level of risk.mean he might slide in dyno rookie drafts too....lets just let him....
I, like Zyphros, am all over him. College Dominator 48.4, BA 17.8, highlights sick.He should especially if his draft capital slips- it adds another level of risk.
That takes my guy out of 1st round contention very likely in rookie drafts, I however will still be taking him top10 very likely.Former Gamecocks star Bryan Edwards breaks foot, will miss NFL combine https://t.co/sctHn8kN3H
There are a couple funny things about that 48.4 dominator rating.I, like Zyphros, am all over him. College Dominator 48.4, BA 17.8, highlights sick.
I'll be drafting hopefully.
I hope so, but I’m putting in info as we go along. Right now it doesn’t look good.issue with dropping higgins @Zyphros is that you're likely gonna have to catapult him back up after his pro day.
i mean, you probably still gotta drop him cuz others will have risen... but he'll be back up there.