Disagree. I don't think it would be good for the country for the President to be involved in something like this.Let’s imagine shall we that Jeffrey Epstein photographed men with underaged women as blackmail material. And that the “hundreds or thousands” of photographs seized in his locked safe contain evidence against these men, and that one of these men is Donald Trump.
And let’s further assume this evidence is part of a bigger, airtight case.
Might SDNY indict a sitting President under those circumstances?
If you think about it, it would be a thing of beauty.
Barr’s DOJ would likely fight tooth and nail up to Supreme Court, but the indictment would do its political damage. Despite pressure to reign, there’s no way Trump would. Meanwhile, he’d most likely lose the election in a landslide, and then face charges upon exit.
I believe your count is off.111 exclamation points. Was that number deliberate, or did you just hold down the key and let it run? If deliberate what is the significance?
Ham said it further up but truly everyone can be, should be and is united in this.I am not making it political. I have made my comments about that anyone involved should face the consequences including Trump.
Technically, isn't everyone old?Dershowitz confirmed to me last year that he received a massage "from an old old Russian" when he was vacationing at Epstein's Palm Beach home. Dershowitz claimed he never saw underage girls w Epstein, but said he was still advising the pedophile.
Gosh. I wonder why he felt the need to say "old old Russian?"
5 years would still be too little for the SOB.Rumor:
Epstein's lawyer has already made a proffer to SDNY. Epstein will agree to cooperate with the investigation, including giving up the names of individuals that paid for activities with underage girls in exchange for a maximum sentence not to exceed 5 years
We also know that Trump dealt with a lot of young models with his modeling agency. It's certainly not proof or evidence of criminal conduct, but it certainly raises some questions about whether there was any overlap there.Ham said it further up but truly everyone can be, should be and is united in this.
If there's a takeaway on the Clinton/Trump it's that whatever Epstein was up to it was agnostic as to party. He was dealing with academics, D and R, Big Money, and somewhere there is a story about where his money was flowing from. I don't see a problem with raising Clinton or that Trump himself flew on the Epstein plane (which he did). It's an open question what was going on with all of them. We don't know yet.
So how is Epstein going to kill himself?This reminds me more of the DC Madam brothel and New Orleans brothel stories. We have compromising activities, we have sex for favors, we have money, we have illicit behavior going on out of the reach of the press and the authorities.
My feeling on this is that we can't say what Trump was or was not doing so let's not say it, because it is ugly beyond the pale, even for Trump and his horrid record.We also know that Trump dealt with a lot of young models with his modeling agency. It's certainly not proof or evidence of criminal conduct, but it certainly raises some questions about whether there was any overlap there.
As much as I dislike Trump, I honestly hope there's nothing there.
Good point, both madams suicided IIRC. That was the case in NO for sure and she was planning a book.So how is Epstein going to kill himself?
Agreed. I dont know what the DOJ wants out of this (besides justice) Maximum punishment for him or for him to name names and punish the whole group. If it is to roll on others, they have to dangle the carrot.5 years would still be too little for the SOB.
The DC madam hung herself.Good point, both madams suicided IIRC. That was the case in NO for sure and she was planning a book.
Do you mean exposed for being involved in something like this? Because, while everyone has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, I would bet all my chips that Trump is involved. I would be absolutely shocked if he wasn't.Disagree. I don't think it would be good for the country for the President to be involved in something like this.
If they found the blackmail stash, this is going to be the biggest story ever.This reminds me more of the DC Madam brothel and New Orleans brothel stories. We have compromising activities, we have sex for favors, we have money, we have illicit behavior going on out of the reach of the press and the authorities.
Setting aside the specifics, I think it's reasonable to at least acknowledge that there's a connection between the two that bears investigating.My feeling on this is that we can't say what Trump was or was not doing so let's not say it, because it is ugly beyond the pale, even for Trump and his horrid record.
Up until two years ago I despised all politicians pretty equally. Quite a few stand outs since then. I know I'm not alone that I want all guilty people to fry regardless of party..I'm just waiting for somebody to say "Well, the pedophilia committed by the guy from my tribe is nowhere near as bad as the pedophilia committed by the guy from your tribe -- false equivalence!"
We all know it's only a matter of time.
Hm, let's say it's Matt Ryan and Julio Jones: totally believable.Setting aside the specifics, I think it's reasonable to at least acknowledge that there's a connection between the two that bears investigating.
For example, if Tom Brady had multiple properties in Florida that he obtained unlawfully and was being actively investigated for tax evasion and other criminal conduct, and we knew that Bill Belichick also was really interested in Florida properties and had quite a few on the other side of the state, it'd be fair to ask the question whether Bill and Tom were tied up together in it, since they knew each other well, spoke favorably of the other person, visited each others Florida properties repeatedly and were involved in similar business opportunities.
We shouldn't jump to conclusions, but we shouldn't be blind to some obvious questions that come to mind.
Right. Same thing happened in New Orleans, the federal district court blocked the release of the records, that was before the DC scandal.Whoa... catching back up on the DC madam.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deborah_Jeane_Palfrey
At the bottom.
2016 Presidential ElectionEdit
Sibley, Palfrey's former attorney, claims to have her phone records and that they are relevant to the 2016 presidential election.[35][36][37][38][39] In April 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the request to lift a lower court order, in place since 2007, that bars Sibley from releasing any information about her records.[40]
Ah yes, suicide.Shot in the back of the head 7 times before getting locked in a duffle bag and tossed in the riverSo how is Epstein going to kill himself?
Just to follow up on this: did Trump visit Epstein's properties? I just don't recall seeing that.visited each others Florida properties repeatedly
Are they holding him until then, hopefully so?Bail hearing in a few days. His attorneys are arguing that this is old news, old charges and of course he deserves bail. Prosecution says that if he is allowed bail we will never see him again.
I gotta go with prosecution here. If there is bail hes gone.
Well yeah that's usually how it works, right? Judge decides on bail.This says the judge can make the determination to release him if he posts bail.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-released-bail-080000462.html
Spacey has been tied in with travelling with Epstein and Clinton on Twitter today, with the suggestion that he was also involved with the sex trafficking (which seems odd as I hadn't heard of any underage boys that Epstein provided access to).Can we at least crap on Kevin Spacey as a team?
I don't know. I'm not an attorney and I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.Well yeah that's usually how it works, right? Judge decides on bail.
Agreed that not everyone in the book is suspected of illicit activity.About the Epstein book - one thing that stands out about Trump is the number of contacts available for him - cell nos., multiple homes, business, assistant. The guy was immediately available and they were indeed in contact. - But I don't think it's enough to say right now that everyone in that book was involved in illicit activity.
Not sure about Trump going to the island. The Miami reporter did confirm that Trump was on Epstein's plane a couple times. She did not say to whereJust to follow up on this: did Trump visit Epstein's properties? I just don't recall seeing that.
- However I think much more relevant is that Epstein was recruiting at Maralago.
Agreed but between being a prolific pedophile and creating many powerful enemies, someone will kill him.5 years would still be too little for the SOB.
I agree completely. To be charitable to the point of willful naivete, let's say for the sake of argument that Trump had no idea that Epstein was anything other than a upstanding, church-going pillar of the community, just to take the president out of this. Anybody who knew about Epstein's sex trafficking and still traveled and partied with him should be shamed out of public life whether they actually did anything specifically illegal or not.My feeling on this is that we can't say what Trump was or was not doing so let's not say it, because it is ugly beyond the pale, even for Trump and his horrid record.
But I do think it's fair to point out how completely lacking in morals Trump is to pal around with such a person. Same goes for Clinton I suppose. Is there a claim people in that strata really didn't know the scuttlebutt on Epstein? And they'd take a free meal, cab ride, or even a plane ride from him? Just disgusting. Bring heat on Clinton and Trump both on that basis as far as I'm concerned.
You know, I think it's very unwise to assume that anyone that has been on that plane was involved in a teenage sex orgy. I get the Lolita nickname and all, but there's a WHOLE LOT of rushing to judgment around here. Let's wait and see.The Miami reporter did confirm that Trump was on Epstein's plane a couple times. She did not say to where
Hedberg: "Someone told me 'this is a picture of me when I was younger.' Every picture of you is when you were younger." Technically, isn't everyone old?
I agree. I was just passing along that it was confirmed that Trump has been on that jet.You know, I think it's very unwise to assume that anyone that has been on that plane was involved in a teenage sex orgy. I get the Lolita nickname and all, but there's a WHOLE LOT of rushing to judgment around here. Let's wait and see.
I haven't heard anything that seriously ties him to Epstein's properties. No significant reason to do anything other than raise the question.Just to follow up on this: did Trump visit Epstein's properties? I just don't recall seeing that.visited each others Florida properties repeatedly
- However I think much more relevant is that Epstein was recruiting at Maralago.
And again, this is quite problematic at this point. We really don't know what anybody knew for sure at the present time.Anybody who knew about Epstein's sex trafficking and still traveled and partied with him should be shamed out of public life whether they actually did anything specifically illegal or not.
i missed it too. unfortunately the glorious ignore function is invulnerable to quoting of said posts.I might have missed it but I would appreciate if someone could tell me many flights aboard Epstein's private jet did Clinton go on and were any taken without secret service?
So page or 2 back being on the plane was enough to convict. Now they have to have been seen on his property? Pretty soon ol' Bill is going to be innocent.I haven't heard anything that seriously ties him to Epstein's properties. No significant reason to do anything other than raise the question.
And again, this is quite problematic at this point. We really don't know what anybody knew for sure at the present time.Anybody who knew about Epstein's sex trafficking and still traveled and partied with him should be shamed out of public life whether they actually did anything specifically illegal or not.
from a 2002 Epstein article, where Trump was interviewed.Epstein likes to tell people that he’s a loner, a man who’s never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
Would not surprise me to find it off by one or two.I believe your count is off.
I don't even think the public has enough to do more than just ask investigators to take a look at the connection.So page or 2 back being on the plane was enough to convict. Now they have to have been seen on his property? Pretty soon ol' Bill is going to be innocent.I haven't heard anything that seriously ties him to Epstein's properties. No significant reason to do anything other than raise the question.
No one here has said being on his plane was enough to convict.So page or 2 back being on the plane was enough to convict. Now they have to have been seen on his property? Pretty soon ol' Bill is going to be innocent.
You do? I must have missed the evidence that Clinton and Trump were involved with underage girls.I have news for you.
Trump should be asked by a reporter, it is a fair question and even a necessary one.I haven't heard anything that seriously ties him to Epstein's properties. No significant reason to do anything other than raise the question.
Why bother? He'll just say, "I don't really know the guy." That will be a total lie, and nobody will care.Trump should be asked by a reporter, it is a fair question and even a necessary one.