The velocity the first few days was quite amazing, as is how this has screeched to so little each day.The bloom is off the rose.
Was just thinking the same thing. Time to start planning on returning the money back to the people. At the rate its growing now, most of the first donors will probably be dead by the time it reaches its goal.Well, the perfect-in-every-way free market has spoken. Time to ####can this idea, I guess.
If ever a group of people deserve to lose their money...
Worst Gofundme page ever. That would buy maybe one brick.So that's like 147,600 in the last 24 hours?
So I take it you don't teach math .So that's like 147,600 in the last 24 hours?
Point is, you have to admit that it has slowed down to trickle. At this pace, it'll take 5,000 years to pay for a wall.So I take it you don't teach math .
The velocity the first few days was quite amazing, as is how this has screeched to so little each day.
At least those that donated during that $8 mil day had some hope. Now it's just scraping the late adopter crowd.
Point is, you have to admit that it has slowed down to trickle. At this pace, it'll take 5,000 years to pay for a wall.
19300266
19447870
19447870So I take it you don't teach math .
23 hours and 54 minutes dude19447870
-19300266
= 147604
am I missing something here?
Lol. You asked it like a question like you were not sure. And now that you showed your math, I think you were missing 4 bucks.19447870
-19300266
= 147604
am I missing something here?
I'm sure there's some way to find out, but when you set up a GFM campaign, you assign bank account info to it. You can withdraw at any time and it's not like the balance shown decreases as you withdraw. I have not seen any transparency provided by the initiator of this campaign aside from "Trust me, I'm a veteran."Any way to find out?
I saw where they announced an address where people could mail him checks.Kolfage said almost 2 weeks ago that there would be a major announcement "in the next week". Anyone know what that is?
that's been on the GFM page from the start.I saw where they announced an address where people could mail him checks.
I saw where they announced an address where people could mail him checks.
My mistake. Must have missed the real big announcement then.that's been on the GFM page from the start.
Speaking of trickles, maybe someone can set up a go fund page to pay for the pee tape, see which one gets more donations?Point is, you have to admit that it has slowed down to trickle. At this pace, it'll take 5,000 years to pay for a wall.
OMG practically going backwards.$19,581,071
I'm just shocked that it actually got another 100k in the last 24 hours. When there's 19 million already that the suckers have no idea if they're ever getting it back. Anyone still donating at this point simply hates having money.OMG practically going backwards.
They deserve to lose their money.
What does that build? like 1/2 mile of wall?
50 years before they get to a billion...
There now I just saved everybody a bunch of time.
The speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this. Trump looked solid, and Pelosi and Schumer looked wooden and even defeated. I'm sure people who just casually follow politics noticed this.$19,774,986
change - $193,915
Huge bump from the speech
I take it more as his supporters watching last night and thinking, 'No way in hell is he getting a wall now. Chuck and Nancy b****slapped him". Thus making them dip into their wallets to fund it themselves.The speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this. Trump looked solid, and Pelosi and Schumer looked wooden and even defeated. I'm sure people who just casually follow politics noticed this.
uh noThe speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this. Trump looked solid, and Pelosi and Schumer looked wooden and even defeated. I'm sure people who just casually follow politics noticed this.
Getzlaf was being sarcastic, buddy.The speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this.$19,774,986
change - $193,915
Huge bump from the speech
Et tu, Brute?The speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this. Trump looked solid, and Pelosi and Schumer looked wooden and even defeated. I'm sure people who just casually follow politics noticed this.
I thought it was some grade A schtick until I saw his avatar. oof.Getzlaf was being sarcastic, buddy.
"Guy who works for Fox News supports the President"
That's some fake news talking head. I'll go with the story that has Republican Senators commenting that Trump's getting it handed to him.
He definietely hit his target audience. His speech was followed by mass emails to his supporters asking for more money to support him for 2020. It was an infomercial to raise money for his re-election campaign more than anything. He isn't even asking Congress for enough money to actually build the wall.butcher boy said:The speech was a gamechanger as evidenced by this. Trump looked solid, and Pelosi and Schumer looked wooden and even defeated. I'm sure people who just casually follow politics noticed this.
He has no plans for the wall...they ask about what 5 billion (or whatever the number is now) will be spent in and he apparently didn’t have an answer. That’s not a great way to budget things.He definietely hit his target audience. His speech was followed by mass emails to his supporters asking for more money to support him for 2020. It was an infomercial to raise money for his re-election campaign more than anything. He isn't even asking Congress for enough money to actually build the wall.
Lol. I cant wait for the reports that show bulldozers could knock them down, bombs could blow it up, and that digging a trench underneath it could make it fall.Footage obtained by news organizations indicates DHS tested a “steel slatted border” prototype.
They were able to cut through the slats with a saw.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/test-steel-prototype-border-wall-showed-it-could-be-sawed-n956856?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma
New NBC report is being worked on.yeah i'm not getting the significance of being able to saw through it. it's not made of unobtainium.