timschochet
Footballguy
Biden is really getting under Trump’s skin at this point. First, 48 retweets from firemen who support Trump. Then he calls Biden “not the brightest lightbulb”.
I would feel terrible if I elected someone worse than Trump. Biden isn’t a smart version of Trump.Do you think he'll win by less than one vote? Seems doubtful. How about this. How will you feel if you elect another neoliberal corporate shill and that leads to something worse than Trump? You may say what's worse than Trump? A smart version of him.
Yes! Sign me up.How will you feel if you elect another neoliberal corporate shill
But the next Trump will be. And there will be another Trump if we don't significantly change direction.I would feel terrible if I elected someone worse than Trump. Biden isn’t a smart version of Trump.
Never learn. They brought you Trump. He isn't an outlier he is an end result.Yes! Sign me up.
I don’t want to get to a different place. I want the place we had from 2009 to 2016. That was a good place.You guys want to keep driving down the same road and think you'll get to a different place. Spoiler alert you won't.
You’re the one who seems okay with people taking some kind of moral stand against voting to keep Trump out and getting him re-elected. Which is what happened in 2016 to get him elected.You guys want to keep driving down the same road and think you'll get to a different place. Spoiler alert you won't.
No what got Trump elected was 30 years of neoliberalism and hard right policies. The Democrats are responsible for half of that equation. I'm responsible for half that for not voting my conscience and being blind to the building consequence. The path to hell is paved with good intentions. I've chosen another path. And I've found what I was always told is true. Doing the right thing is always harder than doing the expedient thing but it's still the right thing.You’re the one who seems okay with people taking some kind of moral stand against voting to keep Trump out and getting him re-elected. Which is what happened in 2016 to get him elected.
Yes the place with war crimes, assassinations, erosion of liberty and selling out the majority of the country. What a wonderful world you long for.I don’t want to get to a different place. I want the place we had from 2009 to 2016. That was a good place.
No what got Trump elected was 30 years of neoliberalism and hard right policies. The Democrats are responsible for half of that equation. I'm responsible for half that for not voting my conscience and being blind to the building consequence. The path to hell is paved with good intentions. I've chosen another path. And I've found what I was always told is true. Doing the right thing is always harder than doing the expedient thing but it's still the right thing.
Come on. I don’t believe in war crimes, or assassinations, or erosion of liberty, or selling anyone out. Must I support Bernie Sanders or some other progressive to oppose those things? I reject that argument.Yes the place with war crimes, assassinations, erosion of liberty and selling out the majority of the country. What a wonderful world you long for.
I agree with the sentiment. But I think those good intentions (“He can’t win anyway and maybe we can make a third party viable!”) brought about our current hell.No what got Trump elected was 30 years of neoliberalism and hard right policies. The Democrats are responsible for half of that equation. I'm responsible for half that for not voting my conscience and being blind to the building consequence. The path to hell is paved with good intentions. I've chosen another path. And I've found what I was always told is true. Doing the right thing is always harder than doing the expedient thing but it's still the right thing.
Trump wasn’t a reaction against the right.No what got Trump elected was 30 years of neoliberalism and hard right policies.
The neoliberals aren't the leftTrump wasn’t a reaction against the right.
He was partially a reaction against the excesses of the left.
More than that, though, he was put into office by people who wanted to blow the current system up. One of the things that Trump supporters and many Bernie supporters seem to have in common is a desire to blow the current system up.
You dont get to cherry pick. If you want those 8 years you have to accept what comes with them as a package Tim. I didn't put any words in your mouth I just clarified what you are rooting for. Now I'm sure you personally dont like those things because you're a good person but if you vote for them you have responsibility for them going on. At some point the American bombs that are used to kill children put blood on all our hands whether we like it or not. The drone strikes that kill first responders put blood on our hands. The terrorism spawned by our violence puts blood on our hands. That's reality Tim. Everyday our consent is used to do things we would find heinous. When do we do something about it Tim? When do we accept our responsibility?Come on. I don’t believe in war crimes, or assassinations, or erosion of liberty, or selling anyone out. Must I support Bernie Sanders or some other progressive to oppose those things? I reject that argument.
And I also reject your implication that my political choices are based on expediency. If I support Joe Biden in this election it’s because his views are closest to my own. That’s why I supported Hillary last time around.
Are you seriously trying to suggest here that if your man Sanders is elected nothing bad will happen under his Presidency? That all drone attacks and everything else you abhor will instantly stop? And if they don’t, will you be cherry picking if you continue to approve of his Presidency?You dont get to cherry pick. If you want those 8 years you have to accept what comes with them as a package Tim. I didn't put any words in your mouth I just clarified what you are rooting for. Now I'm sure you personally dont like those things because you're a good person but if you vote for them you have responsibility for them going on. At some point the American bombs that are used to kill children put blood on all our hands whether we like it or not. The drone strikes that kill first responders put blood on our hands. The terrorism spawned by our violence puts blood on our hands. That's reality Tim. Everyday our consent is used to do things we would find heinous. When do we do something about it Tim? When do we accept our responsibility?
Among Presidents of the last 50 years, where would you rank Obama's time in office?You dont get to cherry pick. If you want those 8 years you have to accept what comes with them as a package Tim. I didn't put any words in your mouth I just clarified what you are rooting for. Now I'm sure you personally dont like those things because you're a good person but if you vote for them you have responsibility for them going on. At some point the American bombs that are used to kill children put blood on all our hands whether we like it or not. The drone strikes that kill first responders put blood on our hands. The terrorism spawned by our violence puts blood on our hands. That's reality Tim. Everyday our consent is used to do things we would find heinous. When do we do something about it Tim? When do we accept our responsibility?
Overall I'm not a fan of Biden and I'm extremely skeptical about Democrats and Republicans working together effectively. However, if I had to pick the candidate most likely to be able to make compromises with the other side, I'd have to admit that would be Biden. (And, for the record, I think that would be a good thing.)
That's a pretty fascinating stance for Biden to take. I'd have to think every Democrat would hate it and feel like badmojo.
Bumping this for @NCCommishAmong Presidents of the last 50 years, where would you rank Obama's time in office?
As usual I'll just recommend that people look at the full context. This was part of an almost 6 hour symposium with Walter Mondale on the vice presidency. He and Mondale discussed their discussions with prior VP's before they took the job, Mondale with Humphrey and Biden with Cheney. - That segment begins at 00:56:47. Biden goes on to talk about how Cheney talked about having a "shadow national security agency" composed of a staff of 22 people. Biden goes on to say that he believed in relying on the NSA and having confidence in the President and he rejected that. It's a very different conversation than what that snip presents. Biden explicitly rejects Cheney's proposal of a "co-dependent" "satellite operation" within the White House. He was just talking about how Cheney walked him through the operations of the VP's office. Mondale himself said that Cheney was "kind" to him and his wife. Mondale goes on to say that Cheney brought the office to the "dark side". Biden then goes to say that he has a harsh view of Cheney and criticizes Bush for allowing it to happen. Anyway it won't matter much to people I'm sure but Biden was specifically speaking of how Cheney welcomed him during the transition.That's a pretty fascinating stance for Biden to take. I'd have to think every Democrat would hate it and feel like badmojo.
Gaffe on his part or carefully calculated move to reach across aisle and invite people in?
It’s my understanding that politicians generally have been extremely courteous and helpful during the transition of power. I’m not surprised at this in the least. It’s disappointing to me that people think otherwise.Anyway it won't matter much to people I'm sure but Biden was specifically speaking of how Cheney welcomed him during the transition.
Please stop using context and facts. It's way more difficult to be outraged by the soundbite that way. You're ruining how it's supposed to work.As usual I'll just recommend that people look at the full context. This was part of an almost 6 hour symposium with Walter Mondale on the vice presidency. He and Mondale discussed their discussions with prior VP's before they took the job, Mondale with Humphrey and Biden with Cheney. - That segment begins at 00:56:47. Biden goes on to talk about how Cheney talked about having a "shadow national security agency" composed of a staff of 22 people. Biden goes on to say that he believed in relying on the NSA and having confidence in the President and he rejected that. It's a very different conversation than what that snip presents. Biden explicitly rejects Cheney's proposal of a "co-dependent" "satellite operation" within the White House. He was just talking about how Cheney walked him through the operations of the VP's office. Mondale himself said that Cheney was "kind" to him and his wife. Mondale goes on to say that Cheney brought the office to the "dark side". Biden then goes to say that he has a harsh view of Cheney and criticizes Bush for allowing it to happen. Anyway it won't matter much to people I'm sure but Biden was specifically speaking of how Cheney welcomed him during the transition.
Welcome to the snark side, Joe.Please stop using context and facts. It's way more difficult to be outraged by the soundbite that way. You're ruining how it's supposed to work.
I don’t think it’s either. I think Joe Biden is the sort of person who separates people from their political beliefs, and tries to like everyone. I admire that.That's a pretty fascinating stance for Biden to take. I'd have to think every Democrat would hate it and feel like badmojo.
Gaffe on his part or carefully calculated move to reach across aisle and invite people in?
Sure, some folks can (rightly so) separate the man from the politics.Incidentally, I think that if Bernie were asked this he might say the same.
I don’t think it’s reaching across the aisle. Reaching across the aisle would mean saying something nice about people currently held in high regard by Republicans. The Republican Party is now the party of Trump. I don’t think think current Republicans have a high opinion of Bush administration folks. They probably regard Cheney the same way they regard McCain.That's a pretty fascinating stance for Biden to take. I'd have to think every Democrat would hate it and feel like badmojo.
Gaffe on his part or carefully calculated move to reach across aisle and invite people in?
I like sarcastic JB almost as much as I like sarcastic MT.Please stop using context and facts. It's way more difficult to be outraged by the soundbite that way. You're ruining how it's supposed to work.
ALMOSTI like sarcastic JB almost as much as I like sarcastic MT. :WUB:
I don't agree with that at all. I don't think the Republican leaning folks who supported Bush / Cheney now suddenly don't care about them and are all in for Trump / Pence.I don’t think it’s reaching across the aisle. Reaching across the aisle would mean saying something nice about people currently held in high regard by Republicans. The Republican Party is now the party of Trump. I don’t think think current Republicans have a high opinion of Bush administration folks. They probably regard Cheney they same way they regard McCain.
If he, like you, sees no appreciable difference between Trump and, say, Clinton, he absolutely shouldn’t take anything like that lesson from this.Why is the lesson that NCC should support someone he doesn’t believe in? The candidates should come to us, not the other way around. Maybe if more people stuck to their convictions we wouldn’t be in this mess. We need more people who think like that, not centrists who ‘hold their nose’ and foist garbage on the rest of us.
You may be right. I just googled "how republicans currently view cheney" and it looks like Liz Cheney, at least, is still in good standing.I don't agree with that at all. I don't think the Republican leaning folks who supported Bush / Cheney now suddenly don't care about them and are all in for Trump / Pence.
I know a lot of conservative Republicans who're luke warm at best for Trump and they take something positive about Cheney as a Democrat including them.
And for sure, I'm going on just my personal interaction which is a super small number of people. It's interesting though.You may be right. I just googled "how republicans currently view cheney" and it looks like Liz Cheney, at least, is still in good standing.
How do you think Republicans would feel if Biden said that John McCain was a great man? It could be viewed as reaching across the aisle, but it could also be viewed as reaching across the aisle to poke the opposing party in the eye. Trump supporters on the whole seem to really dislike McCain (as well as the Bush family and many other "establishment" Republicans).And for sure, I'm going on just my personal interaction which is a super small number of people. It's interesting though.
Again, just from the people I know, I think they'd love it. I know lots of conservative / republican people who were extremely disappointed in how Trump treated McCain.How do you think Republicans would feel if Biden said that John McCain was a great man? It could be viewed as reaching across the aisle, but it could also be viewed as reaching across the aisle to poke the opposing party in the eye. Trump supporters on the whole seem to really dislike McCain (as well as the Bush family and many other "establishment" Republicans).
Already done.In fact, if i were Biden, that might be exactly the right direction to go - embracing McCain.
One of the best openings to any speech in a long while.
That's my opinion too @Ghost Rider but there are tons who don't agree with us. We'll see I guess.Seems to me that Biden is smart enough to realize that independents have a large say in who wins presidential elections, and taking a position like that is one a centrist can respect (regardless of how little one might think of Cheney).
Nope. Bush and Cheney were great.Maurile Tremblay said:I don’t think it’s reaching across the aisle. Reaching across the aisle would mean saying something nice about people currently held in high regard by Republicans. The Republican Party is now the party of Trump. I don’t think think current Republicans have a high opinion of Bush administration folks. They probably regard Cheney the same way they regard McCain.