STEADYMOBBIN 22
Footballguy
Agree but while they followed through with the whole season, they pulled the plug week 4 IIRC.Bust on Vince McMahon all you want, but at least XFL version 1.0 lasted a whole season.
Agree but while they followed through with the whole season, they pulled the plug week 4 IIRC.Bust on Vince McMahon all you want, but at least XFL version 1.0 lasted a whole season.
Kinda shocking considering the success of their first week and their recent partnership with the NFL.A new generation of football almost died before it got old.
David Glenn of TheAthletic.com reports that Carolina Hurricanes owner Tom Dundon dumped $250 million into the Alliance of American Football last week in order to save the upstart operation from imploding after only one week.
Absent the nine-figure infusion, the AAF may have missed payroll last Friday.
And there were indeed payroll issues. An agent who represents multiple AAF players alerted PFT on Friday that some paychecks weren’t received. The AAF attributed the delay to an administrative glitch.
Dundon, per the report, will be introduced as the league’s new chairman. It’s unclear when that will occur.
It’s also unclear what Dundon’s ascension will mean for AAF CEO and co-founder Charlie Ebersol and AAF Head of Football and co-founder Bill Polian.
Glenn also reports that Raleigh eventually could have an AAF team, either through relocation of an existing team or expansion.
hard to tell because the league is fudging numbers (although to be fair, all leagues in the US report tickets distributed and not butts in seats)What was attendance like week 2? I watched 5 minutes of a game this weekend. It was obvious that all camera angles were strategically placed so as to not show anything higher than the first 25 rows of the stands.
But this time it will be different.ooh, spring football here in raleigh. another pro event no one will attend.
If XFL 1.0 couldn't make a go of it with **** Freaking Ebersol and the power of NBC behind it, what makes version 2.0 any better or more likely to succeed?XFL is going to blow this league to hell. They have financing and I bet they are way ahead on the technology.
20 years ago. Andrew Luck’s dad is running it and he is known as one of the sharpest minds around. I would bet a lot, and I meant a LOT of money on the XFL winning this battle.If XFL 1.0 couldn't make a go of it with **** Freaking Ebersol and the power of NBC behind it, what makes version 2.0 any better or more likely to succeed?
Isn't the XFL predominantly financed by Vince McMahon? If so, it would seem less likely for one guy to be able to stomach massive losses in the first couple of years (as opposed to multiple owners each absorbing a much smaller amount).XFL is going to blow this league to hell. They have financing and I bet they are way ahead on the technology.
NFL Europe never found a foothold financially. The attendance was decent through out the run but they were never able to grab enough other sources of revenue to sustain the business.Also, didn't Oliver Luck run NFL Europe into the ground?
I've heard a lot of good things about Tom Dundon - the Hurricanes owner who just invested $250m into the AAF. It will be an interesting race, for sure20 years ago. Andrew Luck’s dad is running it and he is known as one of the sharpest minds around. I would bet a lot, and I meant a LOT of money on the XFL winning this battle.
Gambling is easier nowNeither league will be around in 3 years. I'm not sure why this time will be any different from all the other failures in football.
That’s the Pacific Coast League modelThe only way any of these leagues might survive is to get players in the league right after high school. If they can pay more than Alabama or Ohio State, they have a shot.
They’re both going to lose.20 years ago. Andrew Luck’s dad is running it and he is known as one of the sharpest minds around. I would bet a lot, and I meant a LOT of money on the XFL winning this battle.
I don’t think the people that are craving action enough to be betting on minor league football are going to be watching let alone attending games.Gambling is easier now
Gamblers will bet on anything.I don’t think the people that are craving action enough to be betting on minor league football are going to be watching let alone attending games.Gambling is easier now
And **** Ebersol is still better at TV than Luck.20 years ago. Andrew Luck’s dad is running it and he is known as one of the sharpest minds around. I would bet a lot, and I meant a LOT of money on the XFL winning this battle.
You underestimate our degeneratenessI don’t think the people that are craving action enough to be betting on minor league football are going to be watching let alone attending games.
Arena league!!!Neither league will be around in 3 years. I'm not sure why this time will be any different from all the other failures in football.
Easier to do or easier to access? Because 2002ish was a glorious time to bet with offshore books...Gambling is easier now
Easier for the rubesEasier to do or easier to access? Because 2002ish was a glorious time to bet with offshore books...
Right, but they're not providing the league revenue.[scooter] said:Gamblers will bet on anything.
I’d say that they are, but indirectlyRight, but they're not providing the league revenue.
Ratings were fine in week 2. If they can streamline costs and monetize the tv audience they will make it. If they are overbloated on expenses and are counting on butts in the seats then they are going to be dead. Like somebody else mentioned it’s crazy they don’t have some kind of DFS agreement.Right, but they're not providing the league revenue.
Not really.[scooter] said:Gamblers will bet on anything.
Umm what?Not really.
Gamblers look for "spot" that favor a side. That is done by finding historical trends, there are no trends in this football.
Who sucks coming off a bye ATS, who shines heading into a bye ATS. Who sucks in prime time games, who shines? And on and on.....
Betting football is loading up stats/trends "spots" where one side has shown a superiority over the other from an ATS perpsective. Obviously we have none of that with a rookie league.Umm what?
Man I've been doing it all wrong.Betting football is loading up stats/trends "spots" where one side has shown a superiority over the other from an ATS perpsective. Obviously we have none of that with a rookie league.
A team will be one of 4 things.Man I've been doing it all wrong.
Dude, you need to hang out more in the FFA Wagering Thread. We can all learn a ton.A team will be one of 4 things.
home fav...HF
home dog...HD
road fav...RF
road dog...RD
You need to know how the 32 teams perform ATS in whatever role they are in that week.
The Colts are 5-13 as a RD
Browns are 13-5 as a HF.
So that gives Cleveland a....26-10 trend ATS.
The Colts are heading into a bye week, there....3-13..ATS
The Browns coming off a bye week....13-3...ATS.
Now the Browns enjoy a...52-16...trend.
All kinds of things you search out trying to find a game that strong when it comes to trends/spots favoring a side.
Yep, time consuming. IF...you are serious and play big $$$$$ that's how you win, if just for yucks and small $$$$$ then go with .....nothing.
What would you do with college hoops and nhl 1st periods? Cause they aren't going great for me tonight.A team will be one of 4 things.
home fav...HF
home dog...HD
road fav...RF
road dog...RD
You need to know how the 32 teams perform ATS in whatever role they are in that week.
The Colts are 5-13 as a RD
Browns are 13-5 as a HF.
So that gives Cleveland a....26-10 trend ATS.
The Colts are heading into a bye week, there....3-13..ATS
The Browns coming off a bye week....13-3...ATS.
Now the Browns enjoy a...52-16...trend.
All kinds of things you search out trying to find a game that strong when it comes to trends/spots favoring a side.
Yep, time consuming. IF...you are serious and play big $$$$$ that's how you win, if just for yucks and small $$$$$ then go with .....nothing.
I don't play anything but pro football. Now its time to kiss up to the wife because when football gets back, ha~~~What would you do with college hoops and nhl 1st periods? Cause they aren't going great for me tonight.
Huh.I don't play anything but pro football. Now its time to kiss up to the wife because when football gets back, ha~~~
But no matter what you play, you must know how any team performs ATS in whatever "spot" they are in. What happens is nobody really wants to do the work to isolate those best ATS plays, so they think they can just gut it out.........that will not work over time, you cannot win without the homework.
In football I don't care what you do, how much work you've done the best ya can hope for is around 65%., so it comes down to money management, which is isolating plays you load up on, a 550 play insteadof the 110, so while you hit 6 of 10, you lost playing 110, but won playing 550.
I dunno, it would be pretty hard to make a living only winning 65% of the time.ZenoRazon said:In football I don't care what you do, how much work you've done the best ya can hope for is around 65%
belljr said:SALT Lake Stallions money line is enticing
The roulette wheel has landed on black the last 5 out of 8 times. Bet red, because it's totally due.ZenoRazon said:A team will be one of 4 things.
home fav...HF
home dog...HD
road fav...RF
road dog...RD
You need to know how the 32 teams perform ATS in whatever role they are in that week.
The Colts are 5-13 as a RD
Browns are 13-5 as a HF.
So that gives Cleveland a....26-10 trend ATS.
The Colts are heading into a bye week, there....3-13..ATS
The Browns coming off a bye week....13-3...ATS.
Now the Browns enjoy a...52-16...trend.
All kinds of things you search out trying to find a game that strong when it comes to trends/spots favoring a side.
Yep, time consuming. IF...you are serious and play big $$$$$ that's how you win, if just for yucks and small $$$$$ then go with .....nothing.
Not really.I dunno, it would be pretty hard to make a living only winning 65% of the time.
They just forgot to put gas in the generator.Agree but while they followed through with the whole season, they pulled the plug week 4 IIRC.
The biggest problem with XFL 1.0 was that it rushed and they gave the players like 2 weeks to try out, and prepare. You can't have cohesive football with only 2 weeks of practice. Vince went into 1.0 with only one game plan. They were gonna be different than the NFL. How were they going to be different? Uhh... well, we'll tell you when we figure it out. Ebersol put too much stake into Vince's vision because of their past experience and didn't realize that his idea wasn't ready yet.If XFL 1.0 couldn't make a go of it with **** Freaking Ebersol and the power of NBC behind it, what makes version 2.0 any better or more likely to succeed?
I truly think that you need to have the aforementioned gambling interest for any of these leagues to succeed. When you start playing the drama card and setting up authority figures to become cheating villains you lose the sanctity of the game being on the up and up. And with that, you lose the gamblers.JB Breakfast Club said:I think the best way for the XFL to succeed is for it to become a work. It's what Vince does best anyway... Let's have a heel coach who tries to cheat. Give me some player vs player rivalries that are built over a few weeks before they actually meet on the field. Heck, have an XFL team invade an AAF locker room and trash the place, nWo style.