GroveDiesel
Footballguy
Good thought, although I'm not sure how big the demand is to fly from Philly to Cleveland for Spring Break.Maybe because it's spring break season, in addition to just booking last minute?
Good thought, although I'm not sure how big the demand is to fly from Philly to Cleveland for Spring Break.Maybe because it's spring break season, in addition to just booking last minute?
No. But I'd definitely boo and hiss if we crashed.Have you considered applauding them at the end of each flight?
At least Tesla charges you $5000 extra for an auto pilot feature that will kill youYour car is prone to overheating and blowing up. There's an optional package of $2,000 to install an engine temperature gauge to alert you before it overheats.
A little too complex. That podcast is great and explains it on a very good level.Could somebody explain this like I'm 5? Is the thing that's makes the plane crash a feature? What's the purpose of this? If it's a feature, why is it necessary to have optional safety equipment that alerts you to this feature?
Good insight, thanks for sharing.NYT's The Daily Podcast just did an episode on this. Worth a listen to get a good understanding of how this tragedy happened.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/19/podcasts/the-daily/boeing-737-max-ethiopia-crash.html
The podcast was only like 20 mins but here's the cliffs: The new plane as bigger engines that are closer to the front of the plane. The engine placement pushes the plane upward as compared to previous models. Instead of retraining all of the pilots, Boeing added software to compensate for the upward motion by pushing the plane down. The software in the crashes are believed to have reacted on bad data. Boeing never told the pilots the software existed. During the two crashes, the pilots were likely fighting the software and not flying conditions.Haven't had time for the podcast. So it's not a result of bad airspeed readings?
This is by far the biggest crime in this story.The podcast was only like 20 mins but here's the cliffs: The new plane as bigger engines that are closer to the front of the plane. The engine placement pushes the plane upward as compared to previous models. Instead of retraining all of the pilots, Boeing added software to compensate for the upward motion by pushing the plane down. The software in the crashes are believed to have reacted on bad data. Boeing never told the pilots the software existed. During the two crashes, the pilots were likely fighting the software and not flying conditions.
Interesting. So does this absolve Boeing?This keeps getting worse. Pilot was not trained to fly the 737MAX yet. Very similar to the 737 in terms of flying but had the new automated systems that the flight crew had no idea how to disengage. Horrible.
Reported all US pilots had to get training to fly the new MAX with updated systems.
ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - The captain of a doomed Ethiopian Airlines flight did not get a chance to practice on his airline’s new simulator for the Boeing 737 MAX 8 before he died in a crash with 157 others, a pilot colleague said.
Captain Yared Getachew, 29, was due for training at the end of March, his colleague told Reuters, two months after Ethiopian Airlines had received one of the first such simulators being distributed.
The March 10 disaster, following another MAX 8 crash in Indonesia in October, has set off one of the biggest inquiries in aviation history, focused on the new automated system and whether crews understood it properly.
In both cases, the pilots lost control soon after take-off and fought a losing battle to stop their jets plunging down.
The MAX, which came into service two years ago, has a new automated system called MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System). It is meant to prevent loss of lift which can cause an aerodynamic stall sending the plane downwards in an uncontrolled way.
Probably not. You would think any plane delivered should come with training for safety. They have to find out if it is a flaw in the system..or because the pilots did not know about or how to use the new system first.Interesting. So does this absolve Boeing?
What's still not totally clear to me is that some of the things I've read make it seem like the corrective software is actually wrong because it's getting bad data from sensors. Which seems like a seriously big problem. First that sensors are giving bad data and secondly that the software is acting on that bad data.The podcast was only like 20 mins but here's the cliffs: The new plane as bigger engines that are closer to the front of the plane. The engine placement pushes the plane upward as compared to previous models. Instead of retraining all of the pilots, Boeing added software to compensate for the upward motion by pushing the plane down. The software in the crashes are believed to have reacted on bad data. Boeing never told the pilots the software existed. During the two crashes, the pilots were likely fighting the software and not flying conditions.
No way the US govt allows Boeing to fail.Garuda Airlines In Indonesia just cancelled a $6bn Boeing order. This fiasco will go down as the biggest, most expensive safety ####up in history. To the point of questioning whether Boeing survives.
Thought on the US acquiring Boeing and operating as a government owned company? There's only two real air plane makers in the world.GroveDiesel said:No way the US govt allows Boeing to fail.
Boeing also does our new space program.Thought on the US acquiring Boeing and operating as a government owned company? There's only two real air plane makers in the world.
So we split the company up and roll it into the FAA, NASA and Space Force.Boeing also does our new space program.
The FASA Force? I like it.So we split the company up and roll it into the FAA, NASA and Space Force.
Would think more of a bailout ala General Motors.Thought on the US acquiring Boeing and operating as a government owned company? There's only two real air plane makers in the world.
Doubtful considering the amortization of an airplane vice car. The market just doesn't move as fast with a company that makes 20 year assets.Would think more of a bailout ala General Motors.
https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/1110641459227693058
I wonder what the contract says with airlines that have already purchased these? Can they get their money back?https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/1110641459227693058
Seems like it was an issue with the engine. Unrelated, but how about we just pull the plug on the 737 MAXs. It was a nice exepriment.
Back? You nearly never pay up front for something like this.I wonder what the contract says with airlines that have already purchased these? Can they get their money back?
If they're leased I'm assuming there is some kind of downpayment? Will they just let them out of the contract?Back? You nearly never pay up front for something like this.
They read air flow from different points on the plane. There are also air speed indicators internal to the avionics as well.What's more is they said on the news last night that companies could buy planes with two safety dilly-dally's, or one. With two obviously being safer but at a slightly higher cost. American and Delta ordered planes that had both. United, being United, ordered the cheaper planes.
Someone else can explain how the dilly-dallys work exactly, but they are outside on each side of the nose and transmit info. And two are better than one, United.
How is the second one even considered “optional”? The old survivalist saying “2 is 1, 1 is none”.culdeus said:They read air flow from different points on the plane. There are also air speed indicators internal to the avionics as well.
The problem it would seem is that Boeing mis-represented the extent to which MCAS would lean on single air flow indicators if there was just one present.
These air flow indicators fail somewhat often, they were implicated in the Air France crash as well.
There are 0 on the embrair type jets. Those jets built in the late 90s lack an auto-throttle and are flown nearly completely by hand. The automation of pilot actions and/or lack thereof is a function of the airline to determine what is appropriate.How is the second one even considered “optional”? The old survivalist saying “2 is 1, 1 is none”.
If Boeing made a car would standard equipment be one brake caliper up front, and cost more if you want them on both wheels?
That's not a max bro.@TenikkaANjax: BREAKING: @JFRDJAX confirms a 737 commercial #plane coming in from #Miami went down in St Johns River in #Jacksonville #Florida. 142 people on board. ALL ACCOUNTED FOR. No serious injuries. Searching for 2 dogs and a cat. @ActionNewsJax @WOKVNews @WFTV @wsbtv @wsoctv @JSOPIO https://twitter.com/TenikkaANjax/status/1124506525022793735/photo/1
Likely has little or nothing to do with being a Boeing plane, but still not a good time for them.That's not a max bro.
• “Would you put your family on a Max simulator trained aircraft? I wouldn’t,” one employee said to a colleague in an exchange from 2018, before the first of two deadly 737 Max crashes.
• “This airplane is designed by clowns, who are in turn supervised by monkeys,” an employee wrote in an exchange from 2017.
• One employee, upon learning that pilots of an earlier 737 model didn’t need flight simulator training for a 737 Max, wrote, “You can be away from an NG for 30 years and still be able to jump into a MAX? LOVE IT!!”
Wait. What?I remember right when the second crash happened there was a huge push to discredit CNN as being alarmist on this topic. Wouldn't shock me to see that Russia was behind it for some reason.
Some jabroni started a thread akin to “What Dies Liberal CNN Have Against Boeing?!?11”Wait. What?
It was everywhere. As if a lot of Russian bots cried out in the night for the mouth breathers to zoom in on this moment of weaknrss.Some jabroni started a thread akin to “What Dies Liberal CNN Have Against Boeing?!?11”
Some should be fitted for orange jumpsuits. Not kidding.They need to fire everybody there.