What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Your playbook to removing Trump from the WH in 2020 (1 Viewer)

It isn't just Dems that dislike Trump. 

But I agree with your sentiments. I won't address it again. 
Fair. I am not a Democrat either but I plan to support them at least until Trump is gone. 

My point is simply that this "a progressive candidate can't win" idea is complete and utter BS created by Conservatives.
I agree. I don't think progressive or centrist will matter anywhere near as much as the personality of the person. I think more voters than some of us nerds here like to think vote more on feel than issues. 

 
My point is simply that this "a progressive candidate can't win" idea is complete and utter BS created by Conservatives.
I'm not a ####### conservative, but keep making baseless assumptions, like the other team... And I'm the genius. 

 
Here's how you win. The Democrats become Democrats again. Friend to the working class and oppressed. Enemy of the wealthy and powerful. Try it it just might work. 
It might be tough because as impossible as it sounds, that is Trump's angle. 

 
Then you absolutely pound on the fact that the "deal maker" is destroying the soybean industry in this country, driving up the costs of steel and aluminum based good and point out the trade deficit with China is the highest it's ever been ever....all at the expense of hard working Americans.

 
It might be tough because as impossible as it sounds, that is Trump's angle. 
Well, by November 2020 he'll have been responsible for four years of no progress for the working man.

Trump's strengths: the power of incumbency and he's got somewhere just slightly north of 60 million votes absolutely locked in. Republican strategists, however, are already asking themselves where any more votes are coming from.

The Dems, OTOH, can muster 70+ million votes with the right candidate and right messages, which I think remains health care, education, weed and help in the nation's hinterlands (they have to be careful on how they allocate time and effort to these issues because of the vagaries of the Electoral College). How many former Hilary voters are going to defect to Donald, regardless of which of the 16 or whatever candidates is eventually nominated? If you voted against Donald Trump in 2016, what series of events has occurred since that make you say to yourself, "hey, this guy really hasn't been so bad?"

 
Well, by November 2020 he'll have been responsible for four years of no progress for the working man.

Trump's strengths: the power of incumbency and he's got somewhere just slightly north of 60 million votes absolutely locked in. Republican strategists, however, are already asking themselves where any more votes are coming from.

The Dems, OTOH, can muster 70+ million votes with the right candidate and right messages, which I think remains health care, education, weed and help in the nation's hinterlands (they have to be careful on how they allocate time and effort to these issues because of the vagaries of the Electoral College). How many former Hilary voters are going to defect to Donald, regardless of which of the 16 or whatever candidates is eventually nominated? If you voted against Donald Trump in 2016, what series of events has occurred since that make you say to yourself, "hey, this guy really hasn't been so bad?"




3
Does that matter? As long we haven't hit an early stage recession, I don't think that will actually matter. 

 
Does that matter? As long we haven't hit an early stage recession, I don't think that will actually matter. 
Maybe not, The Don is the master of deflecting responsibility. But perhaps the definition of "working man" is slowly changing around us. Women are an increasingly a larger and more influential portion of the work force and our newest (and eventually most numerous) voters are joining an economy where fewer and fewer employers offer traditional benefits (hell, media outlets are now advertising jobs with  no pay beyond the exposure you might get to other outlets who might pay); the "contract" gig is becoming the norm among our youngest workers. Those voters already swing anti-Donald by 25 points (and it's almost 50 points among young women with college degrees) and they constitute the deepest pool for the Dems to plumb.

 
It might be tough because as impossible as it sounds, that is Trump's angle. 
Difference is we have someone who has been preaching it for 40 years and even people that disagree with him say they trust him. Let's try a little honest and to the left populism. No hate for the other. 

 
Prepare to respond to a war. Don't think the President is re-electable without one and he's sufficiently proved he'll do anything for the brand.

 
sounds like FC wants the Dems to nominate a moderate Republican.  personally, I think Bernie has a better shot than someone like Biden.  if people have to decide between Medicare for All and keeping brown people out and they pick keeping brown people out, what can you do?  centrists (not sure how many are left) will have a choice to make, let them make it and the chips fall where they may

 
Does that matter? As long we haven't hit an early stage recession, I don't think that will actually matter. 
Sadly, I 100% agree. Honestly, even with a recession, I'm not so sure these people will care. He'll blame someone and something and they'll buy it. 

 
Prepare to respond to a war. Don't think the President is re-electable without one and he's sufficiently proved he'll do anything for the brand.


Venezuela 


Unwinnable jungle war in a region w Socialist bona fides. Perfect stasis to rally supporters & shut up snowflakes. Were i Team Trump, i'd be CIAing the #### outta that.

ETA: #callvlad
Holy shnikies - we must be psychic. While we were posting these, Cletius posted this

ETA: you knew........        #callvlad

 
Last edited by a moderator:
sounds like FC wants the Dems to nominate a moderate Republican.  personally, I think Bernie has a better shot than someone like Biden.  if people have to decide between Medicare for All and keeping brown people out and they pick keeping brown people out, what can you do?  centrists (not sure how many are left) will have a choice to make, let them make it and the chips fall where they may
I guess the goalposts have moved so far that a centrist is a moderate Republican. 

There are large groups of people across every demographic that dislike Trump and want him out - you know where they can all meet? 

In the middle, it's a compromise...  

BTW, for someone who said they weren't a liberal during a conversation we had a few months ago, your writing implies otherwise from what I can see. Maybe I'm wrong, but it comes off that way.

 
I guess the goalposts have moved so far that a centrist is a moderate Republican. 

There are large groups of people across every demographic that dislike Trump and want him out - you know where they can all meet? 

In the middle, it's a compromise...  


BTW, for someone who said they weren't a liberal during a conversation we had a few months ago, your writing implies otherwise from what I can see. Maybe I'm wrong, but it comes off that way.
What you seem to keep missing is the middle is further to the left than the centrists want to go. Poll after poll shows this when we talk policy. 

 
I guess the goalposts have moved so far that a centrist is a moderate Republican. 

There are large groups of people across every demographic that dislike Trump and want him out - you know where they can all meet? 

In the middle, it's a compromise...  


BTW, for someone who said they weren't a liberal during a conversation we had a few months ago, your writing implies otherwise from what I can see. Maybe I'm wrong, but it comes off that way.
then you are reading into what I said.  I guess that makes you wrong, although I am liberal on some issues

sounds like FC wants the Dems to nominate a moderate Republican.  - this is a comment I what I think you want.  nothing about being a liberal here

personally, I think Bernie has a better shot than someone like Biden.  - my opinion, I do believe Bernie has a better shot, that doesn't make me a liberal

if people have to decide between Medicare for All and keeping brown people out and they pick keeping brown people out, what can you do?  centrists (not sure how many are left) will have a choice to make, let them make it and the chips fall where they may -   I believe the Democrats should put forward whoever gets the most votes and don't try and set up an opponent for Trump.  whoever that person is, if its a liberal like Bernie, people will have to choose what is important to them.  how is this a liberal stance?   

 
then you are reading into what I said.  I guess that makes you wrong, although I am liberal on some issues

sounds like FC wants the Dems to nominate a moderate Republican.  - this is a comment I what I think you want.  nothing about being a liberal here

personally, I think Bernie has a better shot than someone like Biden.  - my opinion, I do believe Bernie has a better shot, that doesn't make me a liberal

if people have to decide between Medicare for All and keeping brown people out and they pick keeping brown people out, what can you do?  centrists (not sure how many are left) will have a choice to make, let them make it and the chips fall where they may -   I believe the Democrats should put forward whoever gets the most votes and don't try and set up an opponent for Trump.  whoever that person is, if its a liberal like Bernie, people will have to choose what is important to them.  how is this a liberal stance?   
To be fair, I think a super liberal or a super conservative would make this comment, but based on the quotes surrounding it, it comes across as very liberal, so that was my opinion. 

 
Maybe this is a case like another one we had a while ago, where opponents of single payer tell pollsters that they're actually in favor of it to make libbies overconfident.
I remember another time, I believe it was around November 2016 where there was some overconfidence from the left.

 
I remember another time, I believe it was around November 2016 where there was some overconfidence from the left.
Only from those who don't understand margin of error. She was not outside that margin come election night. I said from the beginning choosing Hillary was pushing your luck. 

 
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”

Maybe someone could use something similar to what Trump said about Hillary?

 
We need to move on from the establishment Democrats that sold us this Russian hoax and embrace the new party leaders like Tulsi Gabbard, Bernie, and AOC.   We need to have a strategy besides being anti-Trump.
This would actually makes sense, and is what Matt Tiabbi and Glenn Greenwald have been saying.  But Pelosi and other Democrats are already trying repackage the Russia hoax.  So you guys are pretty screwed until 2024 it looks like. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To be fair, I think a super liberal or a super conservative would make this comment, but based on the quotes surrounding it, it comes across as very liberal, so that was my opinion. 
I say that because I was a Republican for 3 decades that turned independent after Ws first term.  after what I've seen in 2016 through today by our elected Republican leaders, there is no chance any Republican gets a vote from me so I don't want to call myself independent any more.  I think there are a lot of people like me and we're democrats for the time being.  

 
Can we be honest? The Republican party is intellectually bankrupt.  They have no real policy prescriptions outside the tired 40 year old playbook they've been running. You know why it's worked? Centrist Democrats running the same plays but slightly less ugly about it. You know how to end it? Run some new plays with new players. Give the people a real platform for them to vote for just dont rely on them voting against. 

 
 - Stop discussing the Mueller probe, like today... Forget it happened - Americans have short memories, we're pretty stupid, erase it from the playbook, it's a huge win for Trump, he basically #### on the Dems. Move the #### on! 

- Stop with the super progressive bull#### - you will not win enough independent and conservative voters over to beat him.

Now, let's move on, because this is really not complicated and doesn't need to be. Trump has a base, and that base will vote for him regardless of anything - he had a total of just under 63mm votes in 2016. Let's make a few assumptions:

1) That base is what it is, however, that base most likely is not growing much. We knew who he was in 2016, nothing has changed. Of those 63mm that voted for him, the trickiest part is determining what percentage are truly his base, and how many of the remaining voted for him bc they were partisan hacks or simply hated Hillary that much. 

2) 63mm is close to his ceiling and there have to be some people in there who have had enough with this guy.

3) Hillary had just 

So, the question is very simple, who beats Trump?

The answer is also very simple, a centrist, as long as the Dems and their voters get behind it, which they obviously won't. Your super progressive candidates like Sanders have no chance, you won't be able to win anyone over nor get the turnout needed to do so. It's a shame, but the Dems will #### this up and I'm pretty sure we'll be dealing with Trump for almost 6 more years, it's awful :kicksrock:
This is how I've seen it too from a purely strategy angle. But people with much more political knowledge than I have tell me that's not how it works. So :shrug:

I will say I don't see President Trump's base growing at all. I think 2016 was the ceiling. I think he got his "base" plus all the people who generally lean Republican or Conservative. They voted Trump saying he was the lesser of two bad choices and hoped for the best. While the base is the base and I think it's true for just about any base that they're not moving much, I think there were a LOT of 2016 Trump voters who don't fall in the "Trump base" class. I know quite a few. And I think they ARE up for grabs. 

But they will only move so far from where they are. If they're slightly right, I don't think they're going to end of the left spectrum. They'll maybe cross over the middle into "left" territory. But they won't go too far.

So whether they vote for the candidate opposite Trump in 2020 will be entirely dependent on where the Democratic candidate stands. Too far left and they "hold their nose" and vote Trump again. 

Just my take. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is how I've seen it too from a purely strategy angle. But people with much more political knowledge than I have tell me that's not how it works. So :shrug:

I will say I don't see President Trump's base growing at all. I think 2016 was the ceiling. I think he got his "base" plus all the people who generally lean Republican or Conservative. They voted Trump saying he was the lesser of two bad choices and hoped for the best. While the base is the base and I think it's true for just about any base that they're not moving much, I think there were a LOT of 2016 Trump voters who don't fall in the "Trump base" class. I know quite a few. And I think they ARE up for grabs. 

But they will only move so far from where they are. If they're slightly right, I don't think they're going to end of the left spectrum. They'll maybe cross over the middle into "left" territory. But they won't go too far.

So whether they vote for the candidate opposite Trump in 2020 will be entirely dependent on where the Democratic candidate stands. Too far left and they "hold their nose" and vote Trump again. 

Just my take. 
24% of Americans identify as Republicans.  Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid Trump. That would be roughly 19% of the population. Seems beatable but you have to show up.

 
24% of Americans identify as Republicans.  Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid Trump. That would be roughly 19% of the population. Seems beatable but you have to show up.
I'd agree with that.

I think it's even more accurate to say though "Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid whoever is the Republican Candidate". For almost everyone I know that voted Trump in 2016, that was their primary reason. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
24% of Americans identify as Republicans.  Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid Trump. That would be roughly 19% of the population. Seems beatable but you have to show up.
You shouldn't believe polls.  I guarantee you there are a lot more Americans than 24% that really identify as Republicans and it shows up in the voting booth, not in some poll.

 
The bar is pretty low here, Democrats.

If you guys f-- up this election you don't deserve to be running the country.

 
I'd agree with that.

I think it's even more accurate to say though "Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid whoever is the Republican Candidate". For almost everyone I know that voted Trump in 2016, that was their primary reason. 
Yeah that's fair. Some significant number of both parties fall under that.

 
You shouldn't believe polls.  I guarantee you there are a lot more Americans than 24% that really identify as Republicans and it shows up in the voting booth, not in some poll.
For a guy so loose with guarantees you don't seem to bring much beyond your gut to the discussion. 

 
24% of Americans identify as Republicans.  Of that some 80% seem to be pretty solid Trump. That would be roughly 19% of the population. Seems beatable but you have to show up.
You shouldn't believe polls.  I guarantee you there are a lot more Americans than 24% that really identify as Republicans and it shows up in the voting booth, not in some poll.
Good lord. There's no need to be defensive. Pew and Gallup have been doing these polls for years, and they tend to align with actual party membership (with has been on the decline for years).

 
For a guy so loose with guarantees you don't seem to bring much beyond your gut to the discussion. 
Your polls don't bring much either, just as the 2016 election proved.
Actually the 2016 polls were very accurate in terms of party affiliation.

You seem to be under the mistaken assumption that "party affiliation" means the same thing as "who will win an election".

It does not.

 
Trump is going to take care of this himself. He's broken nearly everything he's started and right now with this management style that he has shown in the first 2 years - he's screwed. The USA is Trump Steaks, Trump U, Trump Ice, the Taj Mahal, Trump Air, The USFL  it's a long long list that we get to join. We have a big slowdown coming in growth and big deficits. He won't be able to react smoothly enough to land this plane safely based on his style exhibited - and when the poo starts to fly people usually leave the monkey exhibit at the zoo. He ain't Sully. Who's going to buy his crybaby stuff when he owns it plainly and clearly.

 
Trump is going to take care of this himself. He's broken nearly everything he's started and right now with this management style that he has shown in the first 2 years - he's screwed. The USA is Trump Steaks, Trump U, Trump Ice, the Taj Mahal, Trump Air, The USFL  it's a long long list that we get to join. We have a big slowdown coming in growth and big deficits. He won't be able to react smoothly enough to land this plane safely based on his style exhibited - and when the poo starts to fly people usually leave the monkey exhibit at the zoo. He ain't Sully. Who's going to buy his crybaby stuff when he owns it plainly and clearly.
That's right keep underestimating Trump.  It's been a big failure for you democrats so far.

 
I love it when you guys fall into the echo chamber. The polls were right. She won 3 million more votes. A few hundred thousand votes in a couple of states flipped the EC.
Then why did the liberal news media cry about the polls being so wrong?
Almost every 2016 poll was within the margin of error. A few polls in swing states predicted the wrong winner, but they were still within the margin of error.

And once again, this has absolutely nothing to do with party affiliation polls, which were accurate in 2016.

Denying this simple fact is not a good look.

 
So the polls show 37-42% are Independents - the 37% data is from 2017 though. 

Regardless, those numbers alone show the need for the Democrats to come meet these individuals in the middle. They'll slide slightly to the left, but if you move to far over, you lose them. You might also be able to win some of those on the right that held their nose and voted Trump in 2016 by coming to the middle with a nice likable candidate (basically the opposite of Hillary). 

 
JohnnyU said:
That's right keep underestimating Trump.  It's been a big failure for you democrats so far.
I've asked Trump supporters time and time again where they think he's picking up new votes in '20. If you think he will be re-elected, this will be an excellent time for you to explain your reasoning.

 
ffldrew said:
Trump is going to take care of this himself. He's broken nearly everything he's started and right now with this management style that he has shown in the first 2 years - he's screwed. The USA is Trump Steaks, Trump U, Trump Ice, the Taj Mahal, Trump Air, The USFL  it's a long long list that we get to join. We have a big slowdown coming in growth and big deficits. He won't be able to react smoothly enough to land this plane safely based on his style exhibited - and when the poo starts to fly people usually leave the monkey exhibit at the zoo. He ain't Sully. Who's going to buy his crybaby stuff when he owns it plainly and clearly.
You're wrong about this. 

The deficits he is building and claims he makes basing things like 3% GDP for a decade out, it will take time for that to turn into the tsunami it will one day be... He'll be long gone before that happens.  

 
JohnnyU said:
ffldrew said:
Trump is going to take care of this himself. He's broken nearly everything he's started and right now with this management style that he has shown in the first 2 years - he's screwed. The USA is Trump Steaks, Trump U, Trump Ice, the Taj Mahal, Trump Air, The USFL  it's a long long list that we get to join. We have a big slowdown coming in growth and big deficits. He won't be able to react smoothly enough to land this plane safely based on his style exhibited - and when the poo starts to fly people usually leave the monkey exhibit at the zoo. He ain't Sully. Who's going to buy his crybaby stuff when he owns it plainly and clearly.
That's right keep underestimating Trump.  It's been a big failure for you democrats so far.
The same mentality applies to Trump supporters. They are underestimating the number of apathetic voters who didn't vote for Hillary in 2016 but will surely vote for any Democrat in 2020.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top