A long-sleeve t-shirt.A t shirt is going to stop the impact of the puck? Or did I miss what the announcer was saying?
I was going to use the hyphenated adjective you just used but I wanted to make sure I got what the announcer was saying right. Ah, okay. A long-sleeve t-shirt. That'll do it.A long-sleeve t-shirt.
...as long as it's a cotton/poly/kevlar blend.I was going to use the hyphenated adjective you just used but I wanted to make sure I got what the announcer was saying right. Ah, okay. A long-sleeve t-shirt. That'll do it.
This really means absolutely nothing.....Blues now 0-13 in SCF's
Thomas is out for tonight?
I know he didn't return to the game but thought he'd be ok
So...Krug a marked man?
It’s awful now. No other way to say it.Rut Roh - let the conspiracy theories flourish - Bruins with 6 on the ice when they scored.
What has happened to NHL officiating - it used to be pretty decent.
Edzo explained it well I thought - He was coming in and lined up to hit him - last minute change of his head position as he lost edge at board put him in a bad spot. Hard to change your point of impact at last secondHow’s that not 5?
Stop making sense.Edzo explained it well I thought - He was coming in and lined up to hit him - last minute change of his head position as he lost edge at board put him in a bad spot. Hard to change your point of impact at last second
Hate that about the college gameEdzo explained it well I thought - He was coming in and lined up to hit him - last minute change of his head position as he lost edge at board put him in a bad spot. Hard to change your point of impact at last second
ETA - in a college game it would be 5 and he'd be gone
Has to be concussedHe has his head lined up the whole way.
Gonna have to agree to disagree on this one I think. Gryz prob done for the series if I were to guess
LOL, this is shtick, right? It was a good hockey check. It's not his fault the Bruin was a klutz with a weak grill who can't take a hit.He has his head lined up the whole way.
I assume this is shtick but even still, you are not coming across well hereLOL, this is shtick, right? It was a good hockey check. It's not his fault the Bruin was a klutz with a weak grill who can't take a hit.
Just trying to keep up with your "a good hockey check should be 5 minutes" shtick.I assume this is shtick but even still, you are not coming across well here
Caring about analysis while in a game thread when there are a million announcers and experts out there seems futile, but that's just me, and I wasn't accused of the bad analysis.Great analysis fellas. Really good.
Wait, so now you are saying a good hockey check should not be a 5-minute penalty? If so, kudos on coming to your senses.Try harder bro
There was nothing good about that check. The Bruins had six on the ice. This is now BluedRefChatWithGhostRider™Wait, so now you are saying a good hockey check should not be a 5-minute penalty? If so, kudos on coming to your senses.