What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

2019 rookie rankings Post NFL draft pick 1.01 (1 Viewer)

TE premium scoring leagues

  • 1 Kyler Murray QB Cardinals

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 8 TJ Hockenson TE Lions

    Votes: 8 8.6%
  • 20 Noah Fant TE Broncos

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • 24 Josh Jacobs RB Raiders

    Votes: 50 53.8%
  • 25 Marquise Brown WR Ravens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 32 NKeal Harry WR Patriots

    Votes: 10 10.8%
  • 36 Deebo Samuel WR 49ers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 50 Irv SMith TE Vikings

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 51 AJ Brown WR Titans

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 53 Miles Sanders RB Eagles

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 56 Maurice Hardman WR Chiefs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 57 JJ Acrega Whiteside WR Eagles

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 59 Paris Campbell WR Colts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dont play in this format

    Votes: 21 22.6%
  • Other (please post who you voted for so that player can be added to the next poll)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    93

Biabreakable

Footballguy
Well that took forever it seems. Now that all the picks are in, here we go again.

The purpose of these polls is to get an idea of who the majority of voters prefer at a specific pick in a rookie draft. These drafts assume that all 2019 rookie players are available. For the 2QB poll there may be some variance in scoring. Some may be standard, others PPR. I think a lot of 2QB leagues may involve IDP as well so these differences are not accounted for here. Only looking at the offensive skill players in the two most common formats and also 2QB leagues, to get a sense of where the QB are valued relative to other positions, when there is actually scarcity at the QB position. For the TE premium poll this assumes the scoring format is PPR because that is what these leagues almost always are. The polls assume 12 teams and likely 24-26 roster spots as the most common format for dynasty. Short bench dynasty leagues should only care about the top 6-12 rookie players.

If a player isn't listed that you would vote for please vote other and then post the name of the player that you voted for so that player can be added to the next poll. Also please suggest players not listed that you would vote for soon, even if not on the particular poll that is active.

I don't have any lists to follow for populating the poll, so I will just add players based off their draft position for now. As always I appreciate suggestions of players you think should be listed in a poll.

Thanks everyone for voting. Discussion welcome.

Resuts so far

Standard

1.01 Josh Jacobs RB Raiders 72% of the vote

PPR

1.01 Josh Jacobs RB Raiders 68% of the vote

2QB

1.01 Kyler Murray QB Cardinals 57% of the vote

TE premium

1.01 Josh Jacobs RB Raiders 52% of the vote

The next poll can be found here

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DK Metcalf needs to be on the list, especially with Baldwin seemingly done. He's unlike anything Wilson has ever had, and could completely change the Seahawks offense in my opinion. 

I play standard, so I voted Jacobs just because its such a safe pick with loads of touches there for the taking, but Metcalf is probably my 2nd choice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DK Metcalf needs to be on the list, especially with Baldwin seemingly done. He's unlike anything Wilson has ever had, and could completely change the Seahawks offense in my opinion. 

I play standard, so I voted Jacobs just because its such a safe pick with loads of touches there for the taking, but Metcalf is probably my 2nd choice.
Agreed. I was prepared to keep Metcalf way down on my list based on how he fell and the way his hype faded after all the agility questions. But I always thought KC or Seattle would be a dream spot for him. And yeah with Baldwin likely done for, I see huge things in his future. I own 1.01 in one league and will likely take Jacobs. But would love to see Metcalf slide to 1.04 in a couple others.

 
I'm thinking of being contrarian and take Miles Sanders. Seriously. Howard doesn't concern me at all.
The concern for me with Sanders, is that Pederson seems to really like using multiple RB's. It is a small sample size, but its enough to probably push him as low as 1.5 for me.

 
The concern for me with Sanders, is that Pederson seems to really like using multiple RB's. It is a small sample size, but its enough to probably push him as low as 1.5 for me.
I will simply not be drafting him for this reason. I think it's great for the Eagles but I'm letting someone else take him. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top