How's that? I'm really curious.Because you're a trainwreck. Not attitude, just saying. OK?
How's that? I'm really curious.Because you're a trainwreck. Not attitude, just saying. OK?
I suggest reading your threads from the last few months. For starters.How's that? I'm really curious.
Is there some problem if so, what?I suggest reading your threads from the last few months. For starters.
What year did you run the 100y and when did high schools switch to the 100m?Is there some problem if so, what?
So what do you like to talk about?I have never dodged threads from any poster ever, 16+ years, until now. Not ever... none. I regret it every time.
I'm thinking it was around 1976ish that HS started running meters. I ran back in the 60's.What year did you run the 100y and when did high schools switch to the 100m?
You were born ~1958?I'm thinking it was around 1976ish.
It kinda goes like this.
100 yard 9.0/100m 9.9
9.1/10.00
9.2/10.10
9.3/10.20
9.4/10.30
9.5/10.40
Sorta.
Bullet Bob Hayes ran 9.1/10.06
I was born in 1949, I missed the when did I run track, that was the 64-68.You were born ~1958?
I have provided you with data to the contrary. You just refuse to acknowledge it because it does not fit your paradigm. Or, you simply don't understand measured data. Whichever it may be is irrelevant because you are simply tone deaf to what I am saying. Enjoy your delusion...Why not Google....The Deceleration Phase in the 100m...? It's all there.
It is humanly impossibe to hold your topend longer than 10ish meters give or take. Everyone will deal with that deceleration phase, simply how it is.
Are you looking in the mirror?Always funny watching people on the internet, they always try so damn hard to battle everything. Especially if you give the impression you know things. It is comical to watch.
Look guy, been into this stuff for years, ok? Noway anybody is telling me about "stragedy" in a 100m or these sprinters don't decelerate, ok?Are you looking in the mirror?
No you haven't, you don't appear to understand that data. If you are trying to sell sprinters aren't in a deceleration phase in a 100m you don't understand a 100m.I have provided you with data to the contrary. You just refuse to acknowledge it because it does not fit your paradigm. Or, you simply don't understand measured data. Whichever it may be is irrelevant because you are simply tone deaf to what I am saying. Enjoy your delusion...
Yes it is an absolute is what you aren't getting.I am a glutton for punishment… This will be my last post on the subject. Do with it whatever you like from this point forward.
1. You claimed Bolt hits top speed at about the 80 m mark in a race. I provided data that clearly shows he hits top speed earlier...and he did so in both sets of race data that have been linked.
2. I am not denying the existence of a deceleration phase. I was trying to make a point that it is not in a sprinter’s interest to decelerate before the finish line. They are not decelerating by design (sorry you are hung up on the word strategy even though I used it as part of a conditional “if” statement. I'll spare you the linguistics argument). It is not something they want to do. They decelerate because of limitations of endurance. You on I agree on this, but you are too stubborn to see that. If a sprinter can avoid decelerating, they would naturally put up a better race time. I suspect you would agree on this point, yes?
I did provide you with an example of race data that shows it is not true that ALL sprinters in ALL races decelerate. Asafa Powell does not decelerate in the sample provided. In the world of measurement, there is always a degree of uncertainty. A value of 0.84 s is the same as a value of 0.85 s. You ever wonder why they are not timing things to the ten-thousandths place? It is not because tools don’t exist that are capable. How precisely do you think they can even mark out a 10 m interval over which to time? +/- 100 mm? +/- 10 mm? +/- 1 mm? There are physical limitations to how precise measurements can be. The last place value in a reported measurement is where the uncertainty lies. If you report 0.84, the true value could actually be 0.83...maybe it is 0.85. There is a range of uncertainty that must be acknowledged. The ranges of uncertainty for 0.84s and 0.85s overlap. You can not claim any real difference between these measured values. Asafa Powell’s last 6 split intervals were 0.85, 0.85, 0.84, 0.84, 0.85, 0.85. THERE IS NO PHYSICALLY MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE in the measurements. Asafa Powell was running at a steady rate over the last half of that race...NO MEASURABLE DECELERATION. In contrast, Bolt’s times from 0.83 to 0.90 s does show a difference outside the range of uncertainty and is thus significant. This is evidence for Bolt slowing down. See, I am not saying deceleration doesn’t occur. Clearly it does. But it is not an absolute.
At the 2017 World championships in London, Gatlin’s splits from 40-50m interval and on were 0.88s, 0.86s, 0.86s, 0.87s, 0.87s, 0.87s. I contend the he also ran at a constant rate the last half of the race. There is no measurable difference in these measurements down the stretch.
Yohan Blake, in the same race, finished 0.89, 0.88, 0.87, 0.88, 0.87, 0.89. Is it your contention that he sped up- slowed down - sped up - slowed down? To think that is total disregard for the nature and limitation of measurement.
I don't need the Al Bundy of track telling me I don't understand data. I am very comfortable with my understanding of data.
You are about 50 years older than I would have guessed. Congratulations.I was born in 1949, I missed the when did I run track, that was the 64-68.
I thought it might be an Eminence alias but I've seen a picture of Em and he couldn't run a 20.3 100 yard dashYou are about 50 years older than I would have guessed. Congratulations.
It does get funny sometimes.You are about 50 years older than I would have guessed. Congratulations.
What is this deal about an alias???????????I thought it might be an Eminence alias but I've seen a picture of Em and he couldn't run a 20.3 100 yard dash
What I'd love is unless you have some take pertaining to the topic you walk on by.You would love the dinner table scene from Get Out...unironically.
My take pertains to the topic, most would agree.What I'd love is unless you have some take pertaining to the topic you walk on by.
Not sure why you're asking me where Christian McCaffrey is. According to the internet he appears to have been at some sort of minicamp or OTA earlier this week, but I'm not sure of his weekend plans.ZenoRazon said:Why do Nigerians look totally different physically from Kenyan? Why do Samoans look totally different physically from Filipino's? Where are those 220 pounders white NFL RB's with 4.4 jets?
Are you saying we don't see dramatic differences in physiques out there?
Just one of many....
The study of race and athletic performance is best described as
intriguing but immature. Geneticist Claude Bouchard of Laval
University in Quebec has determined that certain human athletic
traits, such as anaerobic power and training capacity, have a
powerful genetic component, suggesting that, to a significant
extent, athletes are born, not made. One Bouchard study that
compared black West Africans with white French Canadians found a
higher percentage of fast-twitch muscle fibers and anaerobic
enzymes--both thought to be essential to explosive sprinting--in
the West Africans, but Bouchard is the first to point out that
he was not studying athletes. Until he does, he can only
speculate about how the differences he found relate to athletic
performance.
No it doesn't not at all, so you can't talk track, got it.My take pertains to the topic, most would agree.
I hear even the walking footprints track powder white in Peru, never mind those that run for a living.Would someone please direct me to the Dutch sprinters of Peruvian ancestry track thread?
I want to talk about white track just not this white.
TIA
You want to talk track so badly that you responded to a comment you consider off-topic 26 hours later, after the thread fell off the first page.No it doesn't not at all, so you can't talk track, got it.
10.19/20.14What was the cheetah’s time in high school that was beat by Usain Bolt?
Why do you worry so damn much about this stuff?Try and keep up, ok? This might be the most annoyingly obtuse thread you'll read all year. Get this #### off the front page.
There is a great white Dutch sprinter running now.Would someone please direct me to the Dutch sprinters of Peruvian ancestry track thread?
I want to talk about white track just not this white.
TIA
You know how it works, I just respond to who is waiting for a response.You want to talk track so badly that you responded to a comment you consider off-topic 26 hours later, after the thread fell off the first page.
That was an absurd comeback. Seemed insurmountable.Matthew Boling anchoring the 4x400 Relay in the Texas state high school championship, which featured 4 of the top 7 relay teams in the nation. Worth watching for the incredible finish:
https://youtu.be/g0NPo8ZyF_o