Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
The pregnancy ended when the unborn died - there is no longer a pregnancy. The woman will not continue onward pregnant. you understand that, right ? and the reason is ... the unborn died
I've never read it, but sounds very muslim to me to be honest but its fiction, call it what you want
What would you call the physical state of the woman with a fetus inside her after its death? I understand you object to “pregnant” so I’m trying to figure out what the heck you would call it.
the physical state of a woman that had a baby die in her - my wife had that Henry Ford, do not sit on your high horse and think you know people when you don't
I haven’t said I do and I’m not saying anything insulting. I’m sorry for your loss.
This would be a real boon to the notary industry. Would also expand government jobs substantially. I wonder if "child bearing age" would be set at a specific age or if after say 8 years of age all girls would have to undergo a menstruation check of some kind. I suppose in the future the whole process could get streamlined by some sort of app.
You should quote where I said it totally destroys anything. And also maybe buy one of these to help with the reach between those two statements.
Now let's do the one where you quote somebody who supports the legislation that you brought to the thread. And the reach from the parody to positions that actual people hold.
No one does. It was specifically filed in order to demonstrate that pro-choice legislators view the path we're on as draconian and ridiculous. Why would anyone support that?
That's because it's a public copy on the Kentucky website. It was filed as an amendment to HB 148 in February.
yes, they are. forcing women to do things they do not want to do with their bodies.
No way! That is awesome.
I lived it - no the pregnancy died when the baby died Henry Ford, Yes, a woman's body processes the death ..... but at the moment the baby dies, the pregnancy ends
The Bible tells us a woman's body belongs to her husband or in case her husband dies, his brother.
Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system! Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help, I'm being repressed! Ooh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about! Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
Here's a somewhat random question for you...
Sounds like a nation that doesn’t know much about the Old Testament.OrtonToOlsen said:
Hint: It’s the birthplace of the Bible.Stealthycat said:
Zoroastrians?
Again, it isn't "men" as if it is some unilateral action by evil men to usurp the will and autonomy of women. The populace of Alabama is numerically pro-life in roughly equal proportion between men and women.
Polling from 2012 and again in 2018 showed that just 31 percent of voters in Alabama support banning abortion in all cases. Such as in this latest bill that was passed.
I agree it's roughly even women and men. Probably about 1/3 support for this bill is about right. If I had to guess from having lived here most of my life the state is 2/3 or greater pro life. Maybe half of those people support this bill and half are uncomfortable with the lack of exceptions. The fact that it's white men who passed it in the legislature is only because the legislature is mostly white men. There are 4 women in the Alabama Senate out of 35 members. All 4 of those women are Democrats. The 27 Republican controlled seats are all white men. So statistically anything the Republicans vote for in Alabama, and they have complete legislative control, if you use the lens of gender you could say is a male dominated issue. But that simply isn't true as women in Alabama vote heavily Republican.
I agree. This is absolutely an American white + Christian thing. And yet "they" deny their christian-religious aspect (and thus the Lord imo) as the foundation in their argumentation all the time. Because they know how wildly unpopular it is with the USA as a whole.
I'm sure you're right about the "all cases" (which I've noted I would have liked to see the exceptions in there).
Pretty much yes to all of this in agreement. The state is heavily pro-life. The legislature is a men's club (though prior to the last 8 years it was a 130 year Democratic men's club, so very consistent there). I am also generally against this bill, though I understand the logic. While I'd like to see it outlawed with the exceptions I believe this bill, if affirmed, would make it very hard to unring part of that bell and put the exceptions back in. That's a mistake.
