timschochet
Footballguy
That’s fine. It’s not fine to assign it to people.Everyone is assigning their morality to this issue, and many others.
That’s fine. It’s not fine to assign it to people.Everyone is assigning their morality to this issue, and many others.
That's the end result though from both sides. The rest is just mental gymnasticsThat’s fine. It’s not fine to assign it to people.
Not for me It isn’t. It’s a very important distinction. How many times have I written something to the effect of “just because you make a bigoted comment, that doesn’t mean you’re a bigot”?That's the end result though from both sides. The rest is just mental gymnastics
This is a question of morals and neither I nor the doctors involve share your morality.The science is in.....its a human life.
That’s too badThis is a question of morals and neither I nor the doctors involve share your morality.
So a one day old embryo can survive outside the womb?The science is in.....its a human life.
Wow. I am guessing you thought the show "Handmaids Tale " didn't go far enoughGotta say, seeing the 99 year jail time for abortion doctors puts a smile on my face
Except one side will win and the other will lose. And one side when they lose are anything but respectful with this issue. The entire issue is based around what's right and that's where the disagreement is.I guess what I’m saying is: we are never going to agree on this issue. Those of you that are pro-life look at things very differently than I or other pro-choice people do. That will never ever change.
But we don’t need to demonize each other. We can treat each other with respect, and try to remember that almost all of us come to this situation with good will and a desire to do what’s right.
Roe created a situation where one side won and the other side lost. That's part of the problem.Except one side will win and the other will lose. And one side when they lose are anything but respectful with this issue. The entire issue is based around what's right and that's where the disagreement is.
You can only control your own behavior. Just because somebody else behaves like an ####### doesn’t mean that you have to imitate them. Personally I am outraged by what Alabama’s Republican legislators have done here. But have I called them names? Insulted them? No. Not only would that be rude, but also I try to understand their motives. They truly believe they’re helping to save lives.Except one side will win and the other will lose. And one side when they lose are anything but respectful with this issue. The entire issue is based around what's right and that's where the disagreement is.
No I can’t agree with this. Abortion is an individual right. The idea that there could be parts of this country where it is illegal, even though I don’t live there, is abhorrent to me.Roe created a situation where one side won and the other side lost. That's part of the problem.
If Roe is overturned, some states will ban abortion outright, some states will restrict it, and some states will legalize it in nearly all cases. That will take a huge amount of vitriol out of the picture, because both sides will get some wins.
Whatever year we were great. We’re doing that again.What year is this?
I find this perspective baffling. I don't agree with the pro-choice position, and I will vote against it whenever I get the chance, but I get it. It doesn't unduly bother me that people in some other state might vote differently than I would.No I can’t agree with this. Abortion is an individual right. The idea that there could be parts of this country where it is illegal, even though I don’t live there, is abhorrent to me.
Its the same reason the abolitionists were not content to let the Missouri Compromise stand. They mostly lived in Boston and you couldn’t own slaves in Boston, but that wasn’t enough. They couldn’t tolerate slavery anywhere. I view making abortion illegal as forcing women to suffer servitude, and I can’t tolerate it anywhere.
(And Im sure most pro-life people feel the same way, conversely.)
I find this perspective baffling from a libertarian conservative.I find this perspective baffling. I don't agree with the pro-choice position, and I will vote against it whenever I get the chance, but I get it. It doesn't unduly bother me that people in some other state might vote differently than I would.
It doesn’t bother me how you vote. It bothers me that women might not have access to an abortion.I find this perspective baffling. I don't agree with the pro-choice position, and I will vote against it whenever I get the chance, but I get it. It doesn't unduly bother me that people in some other state might vote differently than I would.
This isn't just a "GOP got hardened" story. Try running for office as a pro-life Democrat and see how far you get. This is definitely a litmus test issue for both parties.
There are good reasons to overturn precedent but in general the fact a jurist doesn’t agree with a decision is not one of them. You could argue that societies values so changed as to make a precedent need over ruling. But a significant majority of the country wants Roe unchanged. We break precedent to serve the values of a vocal minority? That would be something.Brown vs Board of Education should be evidence for all time that there is nothing wrong with the Supreme Court overturning precedent.
Because fanaticism and ignorance is forever busy, and needs feeding. And soon, your Honor, with banners flying and with drums beating we'll be marching backward, BACKWARD, through the glorious ages of that Sixteenth Century when bigots burned the man who dared bring enlightenment and intelligence to the human mind.Whatever year we were great. We’re doing that again.
What about the potential lives you waste when you master-bate? How is that act less despicable than doctors ending potential lives? And yes, each sperm you ejaculate is a potential human life, just like a fertilized egg at 6 weeks is a potential human life.Tim, abortion doctors literally stick a device in a woman and suck out the little tiny humans that the mothers don’t want. I like you too, but in my book that’s a bit more despicable. But hey, I recognize our opinions on morality come from a different place.
Hopefully you're jailed for decades for the thousands of potential lives you've snuffed out over the years.
this guy is on a roll tonightWhat about the potential lives you waste when you master-bate? How is that act less despicable than doctors ending potential lives? And yes, each sperm you ejaculate is a potential human life, just like a fertilized egg at 6 weeks is a potential human life.
you mean debating abortion with shader has gone awry?When abortions become illegal, the number of unsafe abortions rise.
Unsafe abortions
And this is why @shader's stance that doctors who perform them belong in jail for 99 years is absurd. The consequence is that women will find other ways and we fall into a health crisis.
These new laws are some of the harshest in the world. That's not a good thing.
Yeah it’s a shame that people will do whatever it takes to abort a baby. Doesn’t absolve the doctor from blame.gianmarco said:When abortions become illegal, the number of unsafe abortions rise.
Unsafe abortions
And this is why @shader's stance that doctors who perform them belong in jail for 99 years is absurd. The consequence is that women will find other ways and we fall into a health crisis.
These new laws are some of the harshest in the world. That's not a good thing.
Get back to me when you figure out the science behind this. I learned it 30+ years ago. You still seem to struggle with it.tommyGunZ said:What about the potential lives you waste when you master-bate? How is that act less despicable than doctors ending potential lives? And yes, each sperm you ejaculate is a potential human life, just like a fertilized egg at 6 weeks is a potential human life.
Sperm isn’t potential human life?Get back to me when you figure out the science behind this. I learned it 30+ years ago. You still seem to struggle with it.
The science of masterbating? Can a person get a degree in this? Asking for a friend.Get back to me when you figure out the science behind this. I learned it 30+ years ago. You still seem to struggle with it.
As a federal tax payer, I surely hope these states have a plan to pay for this. I'm not hopeful, though, as the states most likely to do this also happen to be the same ones already disproportionately sucking on the federal gubments teet.IvanKaramazov said:Roe created a situation where one side won and the other side lost. That's part of the problem.
If Roe is overturned, some states will ban abortion outright, some states will restrict it, and some states will legalize it in nearly all cases. That will take a huge amount of vitriol out of the picture, because both sides will get some wins.
Your fishing trip won’t work here my friend.Sperm isn’t potential human life?
Asking again...what is the science? I can’t deny it if I don’t know what it isquick-hands said:Why do you deny science? And hate life.
You forgot to talk about the losses. Not just the wins. And, as usual, the losers in this scenario will be poor women.IvanKaramazov said:Roe created a situation where one side won and the other side lost. That's part of the problem.
If Roe is overturned, some states will ban abortion outright, some states will restrict it, and some states will legalize it in nearly all cases. That will take a huge amount of vitriol out of the picture, because both sides will get some wins.
I normally agree with most of Ivan’s takes but I think he’s way off here. Overturning Roe wouldn’t remove the vitriol; it would enhance it because the nation would be consumed by this issue.You forgot to talk about the losses. Not just the wins. And, as usual, the losers in this scenario will be poor women.
Maybe. But at least the fights would be at the state level. I see that as preferable to one side imposing its views nationally when public opinion is strongly divided and varies by state.I normally agree with most of Ivan’s takes but I think he’s way off here. Overturning Roe wouldn’t remove the vitriol; it would enhance it because the nation would be consumed by this issue.
Following this course, many things will be attempted to be overturned and many civil rights would be lost in this battle... as belief in civil rights varies by state. The health of our nation is that we treat people throughout equally and not giving "states rights" carte blanche to pick and choose.Maybe. But at least the fights would be at the state level. I see that as preferable to one side imposing its views nationally when public opinion is strongly divided and varies by state.
If you were given a choice between states deciding the issue for themselves vs. a nationwide abortion ban, which would you rather have?Following this course, many things will be attempted to be overturned and many civil rights would be lost in this battle... as belief in civil rights varies by state. The health of our nation is that we treat people throughout equally and not giving "states rights" carte blanche to pick and choose.
There is no doubt that what they drew up was not terribly well thought out. It is designed to be a stake in the ground to force SCOTUS to take it up, without much regard to practicalities.They didn't even try to give it any rights, they just tried to stop something they personally have a problem with.
This kind of thinking sure makes the death panel debate easier.Sammy3469 said:So a one day old embryo can survive outside the womb?
How so?This kind of thinking sure makes the death panel debate easier.
Nowhere in the country does support for banning abortion reach 25%.Alabama is showing progressive movements - this will catch fire and spread.
the killing of unborn babies is ending I hope - and 'Bama is the one to lead. People are sickened by killing unborn babies for convenience. They're now doing something about it. Thank God
To be fair that does not address the concept of banning.Pew would like a word with you.Nowhere in the country does support for banning abortion reach 25%.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx