identikit
Footballguy
I'd want better than 'not bad' options.No...both are not bad options.
I'd want better than 'not bad' options.No...both are not bad options.
Warren is a good option. Pete is a good option...several others are good options.I'd want better than 'not bad' options.
Yes. No.So do you think it's better to ignore them and let Trump hit the eventual nominee over the head with it? Or is it better to hash it out now?
I agree with tim here...better get the message about policy out during this vs. infighting over theories pushed by a liar.So do you think it's better to ignore them and let Trump hit the eventual nominee over the head with it? Or is it better to hash it out now?
Talking about their health care plans.Warren is a good option. Pete is a good option...several others are good options.
And all...compared to the incumbent...are good options.
Yeah...even those are better options than what we have seen from this administration as well. Which is tearing apart ACA and offering no alternative while prices continue to rise and more and more people are without healthcare. (and the debt still rising).Talking about their health care plans.
The problem Trump has is too many people now don't believe anything he has to say. Many people will just assume he's lying about Biden or Warren and tune him out. The problem for him is the people who can be swayed and my gut tells me a lot of them think the guy is incompetent and a liar. The question is what will they find distasteful about the D candidate and will it be enough to either not vote or vote for Trump.Joe Biden did not act corruptly in Ukraine. But Hunter Biden made a living selling access to the White House.
Liz Warren's relationship with the truth is tenuous at best.
Ignoring these problems doesn't make them go away. The "Trump is Worse" defense, while accurate, didn't work in 2016, and I wouldn't bet on it in 2020.
Fine, but handle that in interviews. Debates are to draw contrast on policies and approaches among the candidates. It's hard enough to do that with twelve people. I don't want the time soaked up with this kind of stuff. I can't think of any kind of substantive input that could come from any candidate other than the one referenced.Joe Biden did not act corruptly in Ukraine. But Hunter Biden made a living selling access to the White House.
Liz Warren's relationship with the truth is tenuous at best.
Ignoring these problems doesn't make them go away. The "Trump is Worse" defense, while accurate, didn't work in 2016, and I wouldn't bet on it in 2020.
I don’t think you’re their preferred audience.Talking about their health care plans.
He won't be included in their health care plans?I don’t think you’re their preferred audience.
I like how the Buttigieg supporter draws the line at 6.I'd be happy if they limited questions to just the top-6 - and let the bottom-6 just do an opening and closing statement.
I was going to go with 5, but thought I could sneak by with 6...I like how the Buttigieg supporter draws the line at 6.
Number three in the betting markets.
Number 1 in my heart.Number three in the betting markets.
Bernie sounded like he always does.Too many up there.
Bernie sounds sick/weak.
Gabbi stands out in white.
We're one question in on a softball that everyone is going to answer the same way.This isn't even a debate
I get it, but it doesn't move the needle for anyone.We're one question in on a softball that everyone is going to answer the same way.
I'm unable to watch tonight so appreciate these snippets. Thanks for posting them.Kamala Harris on Trump and Ukraine:
"As a former prosecutor, I know a confession when I see it. And he did it in plain sight." #DemDebate
Looks like Anderson went to the Senators first.Did I miss Pete? Surprised he'd get the question after Booker, Harris, Klobuchar, and Castro given polling numbers.