What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

TRUMP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND HQ - The Great and Positive Place (6 Viewers)

You've been caught claiming multiple times that the Mueller report fully exonerated Trump and/or claimed "no collusion", only to later admit that you were actually referring to Barr's summary of the report.

A few days ago you were caught claiming that Hillary's emails were on the DNC server, only to later admit that you were actually referring to the DNC emails.

You've repeatedly defended or sympathized with various conspiracy theories invoking Seth Rich or Crowdstrike, including this post where you used a double negative to show your sympathy to Qanon.
Completely false.  Mueller's report does say he could not prove collusion/conspiracy, this isn't a difficult concept to understand.
See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".

First, you'll claim that Mueller said "no collusion".

Then, when challenged, you'll say "Mueller does not say he could not prove collusion". (Using double negatives and triple negatives to skew the meanings of your claims.)

Then, you'll claim that your original statement ("no collusion") was accurate all along.

It's not just bad shtick, but it's the very epitome of what disinformation is all about.

 
See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".

First, you'll claim that Mueller said "no collusion".

Then, when challenged, you'll say "Mueller does not say he could not prove collusion". (Using double negatives and triple negatives to skew the meanings of your claims.)

Then, you'll claim that your original statement ("no collusion") was accurate all along.

It's not just bad shtick, but it's the very epitome of what disinformation is all about.
Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?

 
See, this is another example of how you fail to "state facts".

First, you'll claim that Mueller said "no collusion".

Then, when challenged, you'll say "Mueller does not say he could not prove collusion". (Using double negatives and triple negatives to skew the meanings of your claims.)

Then, you'll claim that your original statement ("no collusion") was accurate all along.

It's not just bad shtick, but it's the very epitome of what disinformation is all about.
Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?
No, the Mueller report does not say "no conspiracy" anywhere.

link

 
Does Mueller say no conspiracy yes or no?
He says "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts"  There was clearly direct communication between the campaign and Russia, but Mueller deemed they were too stupid to realize what they were doing was illegal.

 
"The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Sorry, Mueller couldn't have been any more clear.
"A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts"  

 
Round and round and round we go, where we stop everybody knows.  Round and round and round we go, where we stop everybody knows.  Round and round and round we go........

 
Don't Noonan said:
Yep, like you have said before Dems and Republicans will continue to see things how they want to.
True..."republicans" continue to see things how Trump says it...despite the mounds of evidence of his dishonesty.  Democrats and those who aren't all in with Trump continue to look at actual quotes and facts and not conflate multiple issues or buy into nutty conspiracy theories that have already been proven false (like download speeds of the hack...or pushing an idea that there was one server that the Ukraine now has, or that Crowdstrike was the only one who looked at the data and the FBI only relied on a partial draft report).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
True..."republicans" continue to see things how Trump says it...despite the mounds of evidence of his dishonesty.  Democrats and those who aren't all in with Trump continue to look at actual quotes and facts and not conflate multiple issues or buy into nutty conspiracy theories that have already been proven false (like download speeds of the hack...or pushing an idea that there was one server that the Ukraine now has, or that Crowdstrike was the only one who looked at the data and the FBI only relied on a partial draft report).

One side is engaging in honest discussion and provides links...the other side, not so much.
Yes, you are clearly looking at this non partisan at all.   :rolleyes:   

Spare me the honest discussion crap when you continually exhibit how you don't understand the difference between opinions and facts.   :lmao:

 
Yes, you are clearly looking at this non partisan at all.   :rolleyes:   

Spare me the honest discussion crap when you continually exhibit how you don't understand the difference between opinions and facts.   :lmao:
So far I'm seeing one side of the discussion establish facts, and the opposing side try to discredit the person bringing those facts to light, because they can't dispute said facts. Hint: it's not the Republicans bringing facts up.

 
Someone’s a liar

McConnell says he never spoke to Trump about the Ukrainian call. Trump says Mitchell told him it’s a “perfect call” and so innocent.

Mitchell is a weasel but not really a liar about stuff so easily disproven. 

Who we believe here MAGA folks?
McConnell's comments appear to contradict Trump, who earlier this month said that the GOP leader had told him the phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was "innocent" and "perfect."

When asked if the president was lying, McConnell demurred and directed reporters to speak with the president. 

"You'd have to ask him. I don't recall any conversations with the president about that phone call," McConnell said. 
You can always tell the Trumpian language - there is no way that McConnell being the true politician he is - love him or hate him - would say "Innocent" or "Perfect." Even in his worst Turtle self he'd use language that totally couches the situation or neutralizes it. Here the Turtle just nimbly stepped out from under the bus that Trump is driving all over town.

I think the only other person I can recall using the word "Innocent" to describe himself was Michael Jackson.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can always tell the Trumpian language - there is no way that McConnell being the true politician he is - love him or hate him - would say "Innocent" or "Perfect." Even in his worst Turtle self he'd use language that totally couches the situation or neutralizes it. Here the Turtle just nimbly stepped out from under the bus that Trump is driving all over town.

I think the only other person I can recall using the word "Innocent" to describe himself was Michael Jackson.
Yup. Trump was definitely lying there seems to be the best conclusion to come to. McConnell doesn't lie about stuff that is this obvious and easy to disprove.

Trump isn't ever held accountable so he says this type of lie pretty much daily.

 
Make sure you get your Impeachment Defense Membership Card   

As one of President Trump’s most loyal supporters, it is critical that you help the President FIGHT BACK against the LIES from the Democrats and the Fake News media.

President Trump is grateful for your loyal support and is excited to announce that we’re launching our Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards.

We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.

We are only reaching out to President Trump’s most loyal supporters. Your vote will decide the design of our all new membership cards.


Please select which Impeachment Defense Membership Card you like best below by 11:59 PM TONIGHT

 
Make sure you get your Impeachment Defense Membership Card   

As one of President Trump’s most loyal supporters, it is critical that you help the President FIGHT BACK against the LIES from the Democrats and the Fake News media.

President Trump is grateful for your loyal support and is excited to announce that we’re launching our Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards.

We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.

We are only reaching out to President Trump’s most loyal supporters. Your vote will decide the design of our all new membership cards.


Please select which Impeachment Defense Membership Card you like best below by 11:59 PM TONIGHT
Spoiler: it's just a reprint of this.

 
We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.
Well, ok what are the different cards? I guess this means you can show your support for the president by showing this card at any time, right?

 
Make sure you get your Impeachment Defense Membership Card   

As one of President Trump’s most loyal supporters, it is critical that you help the President FIGHT BACK against the LIES from the Democrats and the Fake News media.

President Trump is grateful for your loyal support and is excited to announce that we’re launching our Official Impeachment Defense Membership Cards.

We were planning on releasing just one Impeachment Defense Membership Card, but then President Trump had a great idea - he wants YOU to pick the card you like best. The people always know best.

We are only reaching out to President Trump’s most loyal supporters. Your vote will decide the design of our all new membership cards.


Please select which Impeachment Defense Membership Card you like best below by 11:59 PM TONIGHT
3 easy payments of $29.99?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top