knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Obama was a smoker.And his doctor lied. To even come close to thinking he is healthier than Obama is pretty funny. Or even W.
Obama was a smoker.And his doctor lied. To even come close to thinking he is healthier than Obama is pretty funny. Or even W.
Either way it's BS. People get banned for nicknames and you get nothing for insults. Random mods jump in deleting what they don't like, protecting your ignorance.Dude, I had nothing to do with the posts being deleted, yours or mine. It is unfortunate my clever retort to you was also deleted.
My grammar is fine, thank you. I don't wish for or need your help.
Can you back up this claim? Certified Medical reports please.And his doctor lied. To even come close to thinking he is healthier than Obama is pretty funny. Or even W.
Warren is the biggest phony in politics and it's not even close. I'd make a list, but, I'd probably run out of characters.Warren and Harris. Everything about them is contrived. Warren falsified her origin for decades. Harris had an “off the cuff” dig at Biden yet she had T-shirt ready to sell? Please.
With all due respect, that is contradictory. Running against Hillary and the 2020 Dem slate has nothing to do with his sweeping claims of authoritarian powers he claims that are in Article II but which are not. He did not specify them, but our Constitution is one of limited executive powers, don't you agree? As a conservative you must.2) He ran against Hillary and now will face off against the Final Four of socialists, phonies, and/or the cast from Cocoon.
Biden is the only one that can beat Trump. Only 4 candidates are realistically in the hunt. Mayor Pete has too much ground to pick up.So the other day I wrote that healthcare is a winning issue for Democrats IF they support Obamacare. The latest polling seems to bear that out. A slight majority of Democrats supports single payer (Medicare for All) but only 14% of Republicans support it, and only about 38% of independents.
Can it be any more clear? If next year's election is about Medicare for All, Trump wins (at least on that issue.) If next years election is about Obamacare, Trump loses.
So of the 5 viable candidates on the Democratic side, which ones want Medicare for all? Warren and Sanders, no surprise. Which ones want to strengthen Obamacare? Biden and Buttigieg. And Harris is back on forth, seemingly on both sides.
Buttigieg has no real shot at the nomination, I only call him "viable" at the moment because of polling numbers. Thus my conclusion: Biden and Harris can beat Trump, Warren and Sanders won't.
Anybody disagree?
I agree but he has more leeway in a time of emergency.With all due respect, that is contradictory. Running against Hillary and the 2020 Dem slate has nothing to do with his sweeping claims of authoritarian powers he claims that are in Article II but which are not. He did not specify them, but our Constitution is one of limited executive powers, don't you agree? As a conservative you must.
I tend to agree with you about Buttigieg but he has to be considered because of his money. At least for the time being. I also think that if somehow he could win the nomination he could beat Trump.Biden is the only one that can beat Trump. Only 4 candidates are realistically in the hunt. Mayor Pete has too much ground to pick up.
Trump is bigger. Obviously.Warren is the biggest phony in politics and it's not even close. I'd make a list, but, I'd probably run out of characters.
I figured you already had Warren in the final four of socialists category.Warren and Harris. Everything about them is contrived. Warren falsified her origin for decades. Harris had an “off the cuff” dig at Biden yet she had T-shirt ready to sell? Please.
You know, you and HellToupee and a few others have asserted this, but honestly I'm not seeing it. Is it just the Native American thing? Or are there examples of her being a phony that I'm just not aware of?Warren is the biggest phony in politics and it's not even close. I'd make a list, but, I'd probably run out of characters.
So? Trump eats an extraordinary amount of fast food and crap food and is severely overweight.Obama was a smoker.
Extra apostrophe and comma... intentional irony or reading too many Trump tweets?You could hide your's because of you poor grammar, but, you shouldn't be able to get rid of mine.
Trump wrote the letter for his quack doctorCan you back up this claim? Certified Medical reports please.
That find it funny? You need a link to me finding something funny?Can you back up this claim? Certified Medical reports please.
I think anybody but Hillary beats Trump. I think Bernie would've won in 2016 if they'd let him through.So the other day I wrote that healthcare is a winning issue for Democrats IF they support Obamacare. The latest polling seems to bear that out. A slight majority of Democrats supports single payer (Medicare for All) but only 14% of Republicans support it, and only about 38% of independents.
Can it be any more clear? If next year's election is about Medicare for All, Trump wins (at least on that issue.) If next years election is about Obamacare, Trump loses.
So of the 5 viable candidates on the Democratic side, which ones want Medicare for all? Warren and Sanders, no surprise. Which ones want to strengthen Obamacare? Biden and Buttigieg. And Harris is back on forth, seemingly on both sides.
Buttigieg has no real shot at the nomination, I only call him "viable" at the moment because of polling numbers. Thus my conclusion: Biden and Harris can beat Trump, Warren and Sanders won't.
Anybody disagree?
Drinking a beer.You know, you and HellToupee and a few others have asserted this, but honestly I'm not seeing it. Is it just the Native American thing? Or are there examples of her being a phony that I'm just not aware of?
He's got you blocked, so he'll conveniently never see this. He's got me blocked, too, so he won't even see the link in my quote. The lengths they'll go to in order to believe Trump's lies... just astounding.Trump wrote the letter for his quack doctor
Look some things are just not up for debate. Trump is obese. He eats bad food and gets no exercise. He looks like death warmed over.
I am genuinely impressed he hasn’t had a heart attack or other major health issue.
Better or worse than Trump talking about the Bible?Drinking a beer.
Why do you think he as limiting it to immigration? He's saying that Article II provides powers that no on in America has ever heard of.I agree but he has more leeway in a time of emergency.
I think she's a phony, but no more so than some of their lot. Duncan Hunter is ####### phony as #### and is going to cost our conservative district an R seat. I'm madder at him.Better or worse than Trump talking about the Bible?
Note: before the “no whataboutism” posts, she was called the most phony in politics...so a comparison to others is in context of the discussion.
Tim asked if there were other examples of her being phony.Better or worse than Trump talking about the Bible?
Note: before the “no whataboutism” posts, she was called the most phony in politics...so a comparison to others is in context of the discussion.
The trump is healthy stuff has to be a joke so I’m just playing along.He's got you blocked, so he'll conveniently never see this. He's got me blocked, too, so he won't even see the link in my quote. The lengths they'll go to in order to believe Trump's lies... just astounding.
I'll be shocked if he survives the next term (although he'll be watching/raving from the sidelines).
Fair enough...they all pull little stunts like that though.Tim asked if there were other examples of her being phony.
So I posted one.
You could say this falls under "they all pull stuff", but I gave this one in another thread abut her going after JPM about how taxpayers bailed them out in 08, knowing full well JPM didn't need the bailout but was forced by the gov't to take it and paid back with interest.Fair enough...they all pull little stunts like that though.
The fake news media complex hid Obama’s White House smokingObama was a smoker.
Agreed. That's why nobody knows about it.The fake news media complex hid Obama’s White House smoking
She faked her heritage. She hid that she used to be a Republican. She pretends to fight the rich while living in a three story multi million dollar Victorian house with a seven figure bank account. And before you had to explain how fake she sounds every time she talks she does it for you with that beer video. Her whole persona is a facade, equally if not worse than Hillary.You know, you and HellToupee and a few others have asserted this, but honestly I'm not seeing it. Is it just the Native American thing? Or are there examples of her being a phony that I'm just not aware of?
Come on. Seriously?Drinking a beer.
OKCome on. Seriously?
I really don't care about crap like this, or Dukakis wearing a helmet, or Romney trying to sing "Who let the dogs out?" etc. etc. I really really hate it.
When you say phony I assume you mean she is pretending to be for something she is really against, or vice versa. That's what I'm looking for- assuming that it's an important issue.
OK. Again I was hoping for something substantial. Stuff like "she pretends to fight the rich while being rich"- who ####### cares?She faked her heritage. She hid that she used to be a Republican. She pretends to fight the rich while living in a three story multi million dollar Victorian house with a seven figure bank account. And before you had to explain how fake she sounds every time she talks she does it for you with that beer video. Her whole persona is a facade, equally if not worse than Hillary.
And yeah, I don't like the way she talks. Beto as well. Both sound insincere to me. But that's not what I'm talking about.. And before you had to explain how fake she sounds every time she talks she does it for you with that beer video.
What about mine above. Between her roles in TARP and the Senate, there aren't many better positioned to know JP Morgan wasn't bailed out by taxpayers.OK. Again I was hoping for something substantial.
I didn't see it, sorry.What about mine above. Between her roles in TARP and the Senate, there aren't many better positioned to know JP Morgan wasn't bailed out by taxpayers.
I want to add on this that one thing that has always really bothered me about Warren, and Bernie for that matter, is that its not enough for them simply to propose banking changes to benefit poorer people- they also constantly feel the need to demonize bankers, make them into villains. It's a leftist thing and I hate it. But until you just pointed that out I wasn't aware that she was being disingenuous about it.What about mine above. Between her roles in TARP and the Senate, there aren't many better positioned to know JP Morgan wasn't bailed out by taxpayers.
If I had a nickle for every loaded politician that lied about fighting the banks and taxing the rich I'd be loaded.OK. Again I was hoping for something substantial. Stuff like "she pretends to fight the rich while being rich"- who ####### cares?
You mentioned Hillary. Let me tell you where Hillary was a phony. In the middle of her campaign she saw that TPP was unpopular and so she came out against it. Except we all knew she was for it. That pissed me off. I didn't stop supporting her because there was nobody else for me. But it really disappointed me. Or Claire McCaskill, about to lose for Senator, desperately agreeing with Trump's diatribe about the caravans. That's the kind of crap I'm talking about. Lying about an important issue in order to make some voters happy.
Do you have an example of Warren doing this? Because if you do I'll agree with you that she's fake.
Thanks. Doesn’t look good.Here you go, @timschochet
Warren's tweet:.@Chase: why aren’t customers saving money?
Taxpayers: we lost our jobs/homes/savings but gave you a $25b bailout
What happened:http://archive.boston.com/business/articles/2009/05/15/first_nine_banks_were_forced_to_take_bailouts/
You forgot Trump.I was a registered Republican a few years ago too. Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for years. That doesn’t prove phoniness.
Like I said she was involved in TARP (how I 1st came to know of her) and then the senate. And it's public record as per Globe article. And I share your sentiment about she and Sanders demonizingThanks. Doesn’t look good.
This may sound naive but could she have made a mistake?
She faked her heritage. She hid that she used to be a Republican. She pretends to fight the rich while living in a three story multi million dollar Victorian house with a seven figure bank account. And before you had to explain how fake she sounds every time she talks she does it for you with that beer video. Her whole persona is a facade, equally if not worse than Hillary.
I realize there are some wealthy individuals – I'm not one of them, but some wealthy individuals who have a lot of stock portfolios" she told [MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell].
Hard to see how Warren wouldn't be, by most standards, wealthy, according to the Personal Financial Disclosure form she filed to run for Senate shows that she's worth as much as $14.5 million. She earned more than $429,000 from Harvard last year alone for a total of about $700,000, and lives in a house worth $5 million.
She also has a portfolio of investments in stocks and bonds worth as as much as $8 million, according to the form, which lists value ranges for each investment. The bulk of it is in funds managed by TIAA-CREF.
Harris is terribly fake. At least Liz comes off sincere and passionate when talking about issues. Too bad for her she lived most of her life as a fake.Warren and Harris. Everything about them is contrived. Warren falsified her origin for decades. Harris had an “off the cuff” dig at Biden yet she had T-shirt ready to sell? Please.
They have to come in here and crap out the 24 hour outrage from CNN and MSNBC. It’s there duty!They get bored in their low energy whining threads and bring the off topic negativity in here, shouldn't be allowed.
The justification was that she was saying she's not one that has a portfolio of stocks ( though that also seems untrue). But the juxtaposition of when in the discussion she insters the "I'm not one of them" line doesn't really support that. It is true though, that the context of the discussion was stock ownership by people in CongressThis may sound naive, but is it possible she doesn't know she's part of the 1%?