Yup, one of two major papers to endorse him. Biden only has 3 dozen major papers endorsing him. Go Trump.
Media bias is obviousYup, one of two major papers to endorse him. Biden only has 3 dozen major papers endorsing him. Go Trump.
I'm not sure why they mentioned infrastructure. That would've been a no brainer bipartisan win for Trump during his first 2 years in office. A missed opportunity.
I imagine that an endorsement from The National Enquirer will be coming shortly.
Doubtful. Biden family gives them more material.I imagine that an endorsement from The National Enquirer will be coming shortly.
I don't ever remember seeing a Biden on the cover of the Enquirer at any point. Trump, however, was a fixture there, what with the cheating and divorces and stuff.Doubtful. Biden family gives them more material.
They didn’t endorse Donald in 2016 and looks like it’s was an anti Biden endorsement instead of pro Trump. Still works for me
That is all very fine, but it is still an endorsement from a tabloid, which doesn't seem like something to crow about.They didn’t endorse Donald in 2016 and looks like it’s was an anti Biden endorsement instead of pro Trump. Still works for me
4th largest circulation in a dying industryThat is all very fine, but it is still an endorsement from a tabloid, which doesn't seem like something to crow about.
And what is the circulation of The National Enquirer? I don't think you want to make the argument that the number of papers sold or circulation is some indication of quality or credibility of any publication.4th largest circulation in a dying industry
What the hell does the NE have to do with the post?And what is the circulation of The National Enquirer? I don't think you want to make the argument that the number of papers sold or circulation is some indication of quality or credibility of any publication.
And will the endorsement of this tabloid sway one undecided voter or get a Biden voter to switch? Somehow I doubt that.
I believe he was pointing out that the circulation numbers don't necessarily make a rag into a fount of true knowledge (just like he said in the post). That's why I might discredit the 3 dozen major newspapers which endorsed Biden. Except they're not the NY Post (one of only two to endorse Trump).What the hell does the NE have to do with the post?
The New York Post is a tabloid.What the hell does the NE have to do with the post?
Please keep these extreme Left hot takes in the other threads, especially with the history of biased sources you have used.The New York Post is a tabloid.
The National Enquirer is a tabloid.
And endorsement of Trump by The National Enquirer would probably carry the same weight as far as voters are concerned as this endorsement by The New York Post.
Nice hot takeThe New York Post is a tabloid.
The National Enquirer is a tabloid.
And endorsement of Trump by The National Enquirer would probably carry the same weight as far as voters are concerned as this endorsement by The New York Post.
Stating that the NY Post and NE are tabloids and their endorsements would not be taken seriously by voters is hardly an extreme Left hot take.Please keep these extreme Left hot takes in the other threads, especially with the history of biased sources you have used.
If it takes 5+ posts to set up or explain your “joke” then you probably blew it.Stating that the NY Post and NE are tabloids and their endorsements would not be taken seriously by voters is hardly an extreme Left hot take.
What? I thought Biden was ahead by eleventy billion?Tragalgar is just one poll.
538 updated average of 2020 Presidential polls for Florida show Biden up by 2.4%
Biden 49.1%
Trump 46.6 %
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/florida/
Yes and the national enquirer took down John Edward's campaign years ago with his infidelity. Your analogy is meaningless.The New York Post is a tabloid.
The National Enquirer is a tabloid.
And endorsement of Trump by The National Enquirer would probably carry the same weight as far as voters are concerned as this endorsement by The New York Post.
I bet when Romney voted yes he mumbled something about him not having paid any taxesCNN and MSDNC not even carrying the ACB vote live. Thanks again Harry Reid!
I wish I had a dollar in my 401k for every time The National Enquirer has gotten the facts wrong in a story. This publication is taken seriously as a legitimate source of news by almost no one.Yes and the national enquirer took down John Edward's campaign years ago with his infidelity. Your analogy is meaningless.
The facts are the facts no matter how it gets out
linkPresident Donald Trump deserves more credit for his extensive achievements that have helped black Americans, according to CNN commentator Van Jones.
“I think it’s really unfortunate because Donald Trump, and I get beat up by liberals every time I say it but I keep saying it, he has done good stuff for the black community,” Jones said Friday during a CNN panel discussion on “The Lead with Jake Tapper.
“Opportunity Zone stuff, black college stuff, I worked with him on criminal stuff, I saw Donald Trump have African-American people, formerly incarcerated, in the White House, embraced them, treated them well. There is a side to Donald Trump that I think he does not get enough credit for.”
You are still on the National Enquirer? Maybe they need their own thread.I wish I had a dollar in my 401k for every time The National Enquirer has gotten the facts wrong in a story. This publication is taken seriously as a legitimate source of news by almost no one.
Some scientists say...Check out this read on Corona, not surprising.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wral.com/coronavirus/are-nc-s-coronavirus-case-numbers-inflated-some-scientists-say-so/19355130/%3fversion=amp
Ahh, you’re against science when it doesn’t fit your narrative? No one in here will be shocked.Some scientists say...
Not at all, I am against this vague "some scientists say" as being proof of anything. Some scientists says lots of things, like climate change is not man made or that evolution is unproven or that the earth is flat.Ahh, you’re against science when it doesn’t fit your narrative? No one in here will be shocked.
Ahh, so you only like science when it’s from the scientists that fit your agenda...glad we are getting all this on record in here.Not at all, I am against this vague "some scientists say" as being proof of anything. Some scientists says lots of things, like climate change is not man made or that evolution is unproven or that the earth is flat.
No. To repeat what I said before because perhaps you didn't read it:Ahh, so you only like science when it’s from the scientists that fit your agenda...glad we are getting all this on record in here.
Not at all, I am against this vague "some scientists say" as being proof of anything. Some scientists says lots of things, like climate change is not man made or that evolution is unproven or that the earth is flat.
Please disprove it with facts, show us you aren’t willfully ignoring anything that hurts your talking points?No. To repeat what I said before because perhaps you didn't read it:
17 posts later it will become a jokePlease disprove it with facts, show us you aren’t willfully ignoring anything that hurts your talking points?
Otherwise let’s move along and thanks for the great example.
Please disprove it with facts, show us you aren’t willfully ignoring anything that hurts your talking points?
Why wouldn't I browse? I said I wouldn't continue the particular discussion with GoBirds as to what "some scientists" were saying.RECENTLY BROWSING 3 MEMBERS HellToupee jerseydevil20 squistion
Glad to see the Science enlightened you, we don’t hold grudges in here welcome aboard friend. Better late than never.Why wouldn't I browse? I said I wouldn't continue the particular discussion with GoBirds as to what "some scientists" were saying.
I have one, and I voted for Biden.Nobody that has a 401K should be voting for Biden.
Weirdly enough, the economy tends to do better with a Democrat in office, but points to the GOP for consistently beating that fear drum.That is like refinancing your 2.75% mortgage to a 5.75% mortgage.
Price disruption in a pool of money you can't touch until retirement isn't anything remotely similar to paying 3 hundred basis points more per month to live in your home. Jeez....That is like refinancing your 2.75% mortgage to a 5.75% mortgage.