I agree 100%. When covering non-politcal events and stories they do a nice job.
Trump is one of the reasons their ratings and credibilty is so bad and it appears to drive them crazy as he has convinced many, even left leaning people that they are not a credible news source anymore. So they focus all their hate toward him. Jim Acosta used to be a good reporter but has become so obnoxious with anything that has to do with Trump or his admisitration that he can`t cover any type story without his personal bias. Cooper and Lemon are the same as they can`t hide their hate when covering a story.
Then their whole demeanor, facial and body language changes when covering stories about Biden, Pelosi, Schumer or anyone other than Trump.
Opposite, actually. Trump was a reason in 2016 that they had such good ratings for a while, back when they thought his speeches were just good for ratings and had him on all the time, etc.
It has been estimated that, across various platforms, Trump received about a $1Billion in free advertising from the media who now vilify him.
Trump doesn't do this to outfits like CNN; they do it to themselves with their dogged relentlessness to hate all things Trump.
There is an operation called Medical Research Center and I think the guy's name to look up is Tim Graham. His group has a staff of people who do nothing but watch ALL news, regardless of source, and document it, preserve it, count instances of anything people want counted, etc.
They recently did a study to count instances of how many negative remarks were made of Biden Vs. Trump. They checked in with all the topicals (CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc, etc,) and the numbers were something like 882 negative remarks on Trump and 32 for Biden. They didn't do it to show a bias against trump. They did it to parlay into what I mentioned above in how much discussion about each candidate there is and what it means. The numbers, while staggering, are just a byproduct.
I don't mention this to point out how the media is so against Trump. I point it out to outline their findings.
1)They postulate that media like CNN, MSNBC, etc are actually going to be hurt quite a deal more if Trump loses because, in simplest terms, they have put all their eggs in one basket and have nothing else that they tend to have to talk about.
2)They use this data (and lots of other) to make a case that CNN and some others, but mostly CNN and MSNBC, are, in fact, not really "news outlets" anymore. They are simply ongoing opinion talkshows at this point and there is, if anyone is interested in reading on it, a lot of data to show that it was started back in 1992 to start going this way, that it was evolved to satisfy ratings, and that their current head (at CNN) was trying to copycat the success of Fox.