I mostly agree. At the very least, Trump's tweet the other day was highly offensive (and I have no love for AOC or Omar; don't know much about the other two), and I agree that that is an odd hill for Trump supporters to die on.Good Lord, the hills people die on. Defending the indefensible, and for what? Is it that hard to admit that a racist statement is racist? Is it that much of a stretch to say someone who had unapologetically been making publicly racist statements for decades is a racist?
"You don't know him personally". "He meant nationality instead of race". Give me a break. You guys know, deep down, that these statements were racist...you have to. You just do.
Your position is obviously that American nationality is predicated on loyalty to Trump.Trumps own grandparents called him a mother ####er and are trying to get him impeached over phony Russian conspiracy theory?
What is the acceptable amount of complaining someone can do?Not if the black person was constantly #####ing about living in the USA and thought socialism was the answer and he was further told to fix Africa and show us how great you can do.
That's exactly how I feel about the tweet.I mostly agree. At the very least, Trump's tweet the other day was highly offensive (and I have no love for AOC or Omar; don't know much about the other two), and I agree that that is an odd hill for Trump supporters to die on.
Negative Ghost Rider, the pattern is full!I mostly agree. At the very least, Trump's tweet the other day was highly offensive (and I have no love for AOC or Omar; don't know much about the other two), and I agree that that is an odd hill for Trump supporters to die on.
As much as they want.What is the acceptable amount of complaining someone can do?
No, Anti-semitism and not acknowledging terrorists puts one in particular in despicable human category. Very telling that Dems are not condoning her behavior but faux outrage anything Trump says.Your position is obviously that American nationality is predicated on loyalty to Trump.
The distinction you made above is that while Trump's own grandparents preferred an authoritarian, antisemitic monarchy to America, one of these women insulted Trump.No, Anti-semitism and not acknowledging terrorists puts one in particular in despicable human category. Very telling that Dems are not condoning her behavior but faux outrage anything Trump says.
I can tell you that you obviously know a lot more about Trump's family heritage than I do.The distinction you made above is that while Trump's own grandparents preferred an authoritarian, antisemitic monarchy to America, one of these women insulted Trump.
A tweet from POTUS is and official statement from the office of the President.Congress voted to condemn an effing tweet today.
When Omar made her possibly anti-Semitic comments she was condemned by a majority of Democrats. Her “somebody did something” statement, in context, wasn’t worthy of condemnation IMO. Hopefully you read the Reason article I posted earlier.No, Anti-semitism and not acknowledging terrorists puts one in particular in despicable human category. Very telling that Dems are not condoning her behavior but faux outrage anything Trump says.
Exactly. You also claim that Trump has a problem with socialism, but he personally did business with the Soviet politburo in 1987 to try to build a hotel in what Reagan then called the Evil Empire, he allowed his own children to spend parts of their childhoods in communist Czechoslovakia, and again a communist party member currently helps raise his own son.I can tell you that you obviously know a lot more about Trump's family heritage than I do.
I don’t understand your mockery here.Congress voted to condemn an effing tweet today.
A tweet.I don’t understand your mockery here.
Trump was also once a DemocratExactly. You also claim that Trump has a problem with socialism, but he personally did business with the Soviet politburo in 1987 to try to build a hotel in what Reagan then called the Evil Empire, he allowed his own children to spend parts of their childhoods in communist Czechoslovakia, and again a communist party member currently helps raise his own son.
Do you think this man really cares a damn about socialism?
If they are official statements of the office of POTUS, yes.If awful tweets are the benchmark, I expect Congress to be busy from here on out.
Yet the resolution the Democrats passed on the heels of Omar’s statement never mentioned Omar and focused far more on Right-wing white nationalism and Islamophobia than it did Left-wing anti-Semitism.When Omar made her possibly anti-Semitic comments she was condemned by a majority of Democrats.
Are tweets official statements from the POTUS?If they are official statements of the office of POTUS, yes.
I had a problem with the criticism and as a Jew I’m pretty sensitive to anti-Semitism from both left and right.Yet the resolution the Democrats passed on the heels of Omar’s statement never mentioned Omar and focused far more on Right-wing white nationalism and Islamophobia than it did Left-wing anti-Semitism.
With that said, I didn’t think Omar’s queries warranted a resolution in the first place.
Yes. They are.Are tweets official statements from the POTUS?
Interesting.
Welcome to 2017!Interesting.
If twitter is serious business, again Congress has a new full time job.
I believe they ruled on him deleting them before as well.I imagine he deletes, contradicts, backtracks, and otherwise makes his "official" statements hard to keep track of.
Must be exhausting even from what little I pick up on while not having access to twitter.
I mean if they are regular, probably a good sign for his health.Agree. It can’t be healthy to have the POTUS sending out messages to our allies, and our adversaries, from the toilet.
True, but there’s no chance they’d attack awful Tweets equally.If awful tweets are the benchmark, I expect Congress to be busy from here on out.
I believe they ruled on him deleting them before as well.
A NYC Democrat, and he obviously doesn't give 2 damns about big government. So his claims about his caring about socialism are lies and his claims about Dems hating America are lies.Trump was also once a Democrat
It's astonishing that you would even start this thread , not knowing what Trump has been tweeting for the past decade.I'd like to say I am tempted to sign up for Twitter.
But I'm not.
Yes. They likely treat that differently than that of President.True, but there’s no chance they’d attack awful Tweets equally.
For instance, one of the Squad members currently criticizing Trump for racist Tweets, Ayanna Pressley, issued one herself last week, and it was applauded by many of the people now condemning racist Tweets.
Here
For those unfamiliar with the term “Becky”, it’s a derisive term used to describe a typical white woman in a negative manner. It would be the equivalent of Kellyanne Conway calling Ayanna Pressley “LaQuisha”.
He calls it his throneAgree. It can’t be healthy to have the POTUS sending out messages to our allies, and our adversaries, from the toilet.
Is there a shortage of media outlets reporting on Trump’s Tweets or people sharing them online?It's astonishing that you would even start this thread , not knowing what Trump has been tweeting for the past decade.
You've been following his tweets for the past 10 years?Is there a shortage of media outlets reporting on Trump’s Tweets or people sharing them online?
I’m not on Twitter either, but I feel like I have a pretty strong grasp on Trump’s Tweets.
OK, but then why have Congressional resolutions to admonish other Representatives like Ilhan Omar And Steve King for their racially-tinged statements, but not even a negative word to Pressley for her’s? They’re all Representatives. Is it perhaps not the President vs. Rep distinction you referenced, but rather a differing standard as to which racially-tinged negative commentary we deem acceptable?Yes. They likely treat that differently than that of President.
Hot take, grandpa.Congress voted to condemn an effing tweet today.
Gary Coal Man said:
For those unfamiliar with the term “Becky”, it’s a derisive term used to describe a typical white woman in a negative manner.
Forget it, Jake. It’s matuskiI don’t understand your mockery here.
We’re not. We’re setting the bar at reality while you make excuses for a member of Congress intending to demean a member of the President’s Administration with a known racial epithet. You’re proving my point about how people apply different standards based on who is hurling the racial abuse and who is receiving it.Let's not set the bar at urbandictionary.com.
Nancy Pelosi would like a word with you.Only people who make racist statements get accused of it...its not everyone.
I don’t think it’s racist:True, but there’s no chance they’d attack awful Tweets equally.
For instance, one of the Squad members currently criticizing Trump for racist Tweets, Ayanna Pressley, issued one herself last week, and it was applauded by many of the people now condemning racist Tweets.
Here
For those unfamiliar with the term “Becky”, it’s a derisive term used to describe a typical white woman in a negative manner. It would be the equivalent of Kellyanne Conway calling Ayanna Pressley “LaQuisha”.