Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Engram is the clear #1 receiver on the Giants and doesn't look to have any competition for that role this season. They'll be playing from behind a lot. I don't see why he won't be the same safety net for Jones as he is for Manning.
In my leagues you never no. Somebody may bid 30% in one and he may go for 6% in another. It appears he is going to have a solid role in that offense and may be even better if and when his college QB Haskins gets in there. I left myself very weak at the number 4 WR position on an otherwise very good team. My number 3 Dede Westbrook may take a hit with Foles out. I'm considering over bidding to make sure I get him. It would be interesting to here what others are thinking to get a better idea of what the ball park number should be. I feel like 17% is about right but again I'm kinda desperate.rascal said:
Agree with most of these, except DK Metcalf. Seahawks are run first, but they still have a passing game, and only 2 WRs saw targets. He's going to get targets and red zone opportunities. I'd rate higher.
Where does Tyrell Williams fall in this analysis? He went undrafted and under the radar through the whole AB shenanigans in my league.
I’m in at 24%. Drafted Henrycoyote5 said:
that's fair. he was probably the toughest one for me to decide on. he's probably got more of the tools to be a major all-around threat.
I have been a Tyrell fan for a long time. I would probably make him the number 1 WR target. Guaranteed volume and a known commodity. I would accept arguments for others that might have higher ceilings, but he probably has the highest median outcome of any of these receivers.
It's Tyrell, McLaurin, Ross, M Brown for me. I have the 12 WW spot so those names don't matter to me probably. I will be looking at Amendola or Chris Conley.
Thanks. That’s my consensus as well, but I have a big shiny Hock staring at me as well. Can go for them both but it means dropping a RB flier I don’t want to part wats with.
Kind of where I’m at. Difficult oneScary Terry Vs Hollywood Brown is killin me.
I like Brown’s QB a LOT more.
the Redskins won’t be running as much as the Ravens.
Keenum isn’t going to be this good every week.
Ravens aren’t playing Miami every week.
Brown is electric.
Scary Terry is also capable of the big play.
Brown 14 snaps.
Terry was on the field damn near every play.
gah. Imma spend my 1.01, but just cannot decide. This is killin me. Feel like whichever I pick it’ll be the wrong dude.
Once Keenum gets benched, Haskins will be the guy. Terry and Haskins were teammates last year at Ohio state. I’m all in on Terry.Scary Terry Vs Hollywood Brown is killin me.
I like Brown’s QB a LOT more.
the Redskins won’t be running as much as the Ravens.
Keenum isn’t going to be this good every week.
Ravens aren’t playing Miami every week.
Brown is electric.
Scary Terry is also capable of the big play.
Brown 14 snaps.
Terry was on the field damn near every play.
gah. Imma spend my 1.01, but just cannot decide. This is killin me. Feel like whichever I pick it’ll be the wrong dude.
High priority. Packers don’t play the bears every week.
I just traded for him in one league and am starting him in another. I don't love the matchup this week either but I am pretty thin at WR in that league and already need help there. He will have big weeks here and there as GB picks up some steam.
They could increase. Remember, this was a blowout & Brown coming off a foot injury. Why keep running him out there?
Yea, that's what I was thinking.....that game seems forever ago and no one is thinking about anyone from either team since the offenses struggled......John Brown is also available though.
I’m not a big Kirk guy, but as that game went on, we saw some of what their shiny new QB is capable of.
I would go with the better player and that is Hollywood. I'll be honest: I was a doubter. Generally guys who miss a lot of OTAs and preseason do not start well. But he is beyond that now and he looks really good. Neither guy is available in my dynasty but the guy I would want is Hollywood. He has a much higher ceiling.Scary Terry Vs Hollywood Brown is killin me.
I like Brown’s QB a LOT more.
the Redskins won’t be running as much as the Ravens.
Keenum isn’t going to be this good every week.
Ravens aren’t playing Miami every week.
Brown is electric.
Scary Terry is also capable of the big play.
Brown 14 snaps.
Terry was on the field damn near every play.
gah. Imma spend my 1.01, but just cannot decide. This is killin me. Feel like whichever I pick it’ll be the wrong dude.
Even though I'm set at TE, slightly weak at WR (Amari, Josh Gordon, Robby Anderson, Sutton, & Mike Williams) & I "think" if I get Malcolm Brown the Gurley owner would make me an offer, I'm also leaning Hock over both Tyrell Williams & Malcolm Brown.
I also have Pollard and Thompson. Gonna hold both for now, one a handcuff, the other potential keeper. Dropping Damien Harris.
I want the guy with lesser talent but the much bigger opportunity share and that's McLaurin. Dude is more a track guy with 4.3-ish speed, but you saw that speed on display and really should've had a bigger day. He has less competition for his target share than Brown: Washington's other WRs are Paul Richardson, Trey Quinn, Kelvin Harmon, and Steven Sims Jr. Brown has to deal with another talented WR in Boykin and current "#1 WR" Willie Snead. If McLaurin can learn the nuances of the WR position he's primed to become the #1 WR on a Washington team that may be playing from behind constantly and has to pass.
Mind breaking down how exactly a change at QB will be bad for Evans? Normally it's supposed to be a good to a great thing for a TE to have a rookie QB On a side note I'm not so sure Eli had such a bad game Giants put up 470 total yards against what might be an okay defenseBigTex said:
i mean, he is like 94% owned, but if he's out there, yes, i would probably take Watkins. Only concern would be health history, but he physically looked fantastic on Sunday. Also can he be the number 1 guy and/or can Hardman take enough attention away to open things up. But still, number 1 WR in probably number 1 offense, yes.
It's confusing why he's out on waivers, but there are ten-team leagues with short benches or leagues with transaction fees people might not want to pay, etc. -- or even a draft that just got away from league members. Or a dynasty squad with fees, again. But Watkins was WR #2 on that offense to begin the year. That says something.
