hammerva 404 Posted November 13 Just now, KCitons said: So this is now turned into a search for the identity of the WB? Most conservatives seem to know the identity already. Or think they know because they are constantly going on Fox News and blurting out the name "accidentally" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waingro 1,214 Posted November 13 (edited) Jordan already spitting out false accusations stating Schiff knows the WB identity. Schiff denied this. Edited November 13 by Waingro 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Schiff responds to point of order accusing him of preventing lines of inquiry. The congressman replies that he only prevented exposing the identity of the whistleblower. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sinn Fein 29,574 Posted November 13 I thought it was interesting that Schiff said specifically that he does not know the identity of the whistleblower... 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamny 5,064 Posted November 13 2 minutes ago, hammerva said: Most conservatives seem to know the identity already. Or think they know because they are constantly going on Fox News and blurting out the name "accidentally" Constantly?  That's interesting considering I watch Fox News and have yet to hear his/her name. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 George Kent starts his opening statement with a personal and family biography of their long service to America including an Uncle who was a POW in Japan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Max Power 1,805 Posted November 13 Did Schiff just say he doesn't know who the whistleblower is? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Anonymous 787 Posted November 13 1 minute ago, Sinn Fein said: I thought it was interesting that Schiff said specifically that he does not know the identity of the whistleblower... For Schiff's sake that better be the truth because if proven otherwise, it just might undermine this whole investigation. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 George Kent: "It was unexpected, and most unfortunate, to watch some Americans — including those who allied themselves with corrupt Ukrainians in pursuit of private agendas — launch attacks on dedicated public servants advancing U.S. interests in Ukraine." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lutherman2112 1,870 Posted November 13 27 minutes ago, beef said: Does Jim Jordan own a suit coat? Yes. Explanation: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4734312/user-clip-jim-jordan-wears-jacket  (one minute video) 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheMagus 1,359 Posted November 13 1 minute ago, Max Power said: Did Schiff just say he doesn't know who the whistleblower is? Yes. He has said all along that he does not want to know the whistleblower's identity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sinn Fein 29,574 Posted November 13 I would be surprised if Schiff "knows" the identity. This is not to say that members of Schiff's staff don't know the identity. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Link to where you can read the full opening statement of George Kent: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-george-kents-full-opening-statement-in-the-impeachment-hearing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maurile Tremblay 18,909 Posted November 13 3 minutes ago, Max Power said: Did Schiff just say he doesn't know who the whistleblower is? Yes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timschochet 24,546 Posted November 13 4 minutes ago, Mr Anonymous said: For Schiff's sake that better be the truth because if proven otherwise, it just might undermine this whole investigation. Why would it? Look, either Trump committed a high crime or he didn’t. The rest of this is just distraction. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hagmania 7,077 Posted November 13 Lol is Nunes looking at his phone 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timschochet 24,546 Posted November 13 I like bow ties. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zoobird 70 Posted November 13 Just now, hagmania said: Lol is Nunes looking at his phone Checking how his cow thinks things are going so far. 3 1 1 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beef 692 Posted November 13 (edited) 2 minutes ago, hagmania said: Lol is Nunes looking at his phone Probably checking to see what his cow is saying about all this. Or getting new talking points from trump or Hannity. Ha, you beat me zoobird! Edited November 13 by beef 3 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jackstraw 3,547 Posted November 13 8 minutes ago, Mr Anonymous said: For Schiff's sake that better be the truth because if proven otherwise, it just might undermine this whole investigation. That's damn funny. Pretty high bar considering what conservatives poo poo on a regular basis. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kal El 1,245 Posted November 13 2 minutes ago, zoobird said: Checking how his cow thinks things are going so far. Did the cow tell him to moove along?  Thank you, thank you, I'll see myself out! 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 George Kent: "In mid-August, it became clear to me that Giuliani’s efforts to gin up politically-motivated investigations were now infecting U.S. engagement with Ukraine, leveraging President Zelenskyy’s desire for a White House meeting." 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sinn Fein 29,574 Posted November 13 Its going to be interesting to see how the GOP attack Kent. I think he could be more problematic for the GOP than it might appear at first blush. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Commish 9,967 Posted November 13 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Max Power said: Sure, but that opens up the narrative for the Rs to say whatever they want about him or however they want to portray him. who? The whistle blower that they don't know the identity of? What do you mean "opens up the narrative"? This ship has sailed....they aren't going to let identity get in the way of them saying whatever they want about him/her...they already are  That's the only card they have left in their hand....attack the source and not what the source is saying. Identity will NOT get in the way of that. Edited November 13 by The Commish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheMagus 1,359 Posted November 13 1 minute ago, Sinn Fein said: Its going to be interesting to see how the GOP attack Kent. I think he could be more problematic for the GOP than it might appear at first blush. His opening statement was damning and he sounds pissed. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yak651 613 Posted November 13 8 minutes ago, timschochet said: Why would it? Look, either Trump committed a high crime or he didn’t. The rest of this is just distraction. Lying at this hearing would not go over well. Bad enough he made the decision to "embellish" the Trump call, he has bungled a lot of this and if this fails fingers will be pointing at him for his handling of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hagmania 7,077 Posted November 13 Ambassador Taylor's voice 😳 😳 😳 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beef 692 Posted November 13 Amb. Taylor has a perfect voice for announcing boxing matches.  Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JbizzleMan 252 Posted November 13 Just now, hagmania said: Ambassador Taylor's voice 😳 😳 😳 This guy has a future in voice over work. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Ambassador Bill Taylor says he isn't taking sides Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greenroom 67 Posted November 13 (edited) 15 minutes ago, hagmania said: Lol is Nunes looking at his phone Wonder who text him President Trump or Putin? LOL Edited November 13 by greenroom Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tolstoy 94 Posted November 13 this guy is not a Putin fan. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FF Ninja 2,784 Posted November 13 1 minute ago, greenroom said: Wonder text him President Trump or Putin? LOL All three are on a group chat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Bill Taylor: It would be CRAZY to withhold Ukrainian assistance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sinn Fein 29,574 Posted November 13 I think these opening statements are pretty important is setting the backdrop to "Why should we even care about Ukraine?" 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Anonymous 787 Posted November 13 No, it definitely wouldn't undermine the impeachment effort if the person acting as lead prosecutor was proven to be lying about knowledge of the whistleblower's identity. That would have no effect on public opinion whatsoever. How can someone argue that it shouldn't matter with a straight face? Say you believe Schiff and since he was being truthful, there's nothing to worry about. But don't try and sell the idea that if it turns out he was lying, it wouldn't matter. Have some dignity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beef 692 Posted November 13 Just now, Tolstoy said: this guy is not a Putin fan. No, not at all. Sounds like a Republican prior to 2016.  1 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Just now, squistion said: Bill Taylor: It would be CRAZY to withhold Ukrainian assistance. Full quote: "As the Committee is aware, I wrote that withholding security assistance in exchange for help with a domestic political campaign in the United States would be 'crazy.' I believed that then and I believe it now." 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Bill Taylor: "My sole purpose is to provide facts as I know them about the incidents in question as well as my views about the strategic importance to Ukraine to the U.S." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tolstoy 94 Posted November 13 16 minutes ago, timschochet said: Why would it? Look, either Trump committed a high crime or he didn’t. The rest of this is just distraction. that's ridiculous Tim. If Schiff just lied about that, it's bad. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheMagus 1,359 Posted November 13 I was thinking that Tim was dead wrong about these hearings swaying public opinion. But listening to these opening statements.... it is going to be very difficult to try to paint these guys as partisan witch hunters or somehow reproachable characters. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sinn Fein 29,574 Posted November 13 A lot of "Acting" in the titles of Trump appointments... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sho nuff 12,063 Posted November 13 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Mr Anonymous said: No, it definitely wouldn't undermine the impeachment effort if the person acting as lead prosecutor was proven to be lying about knowledge of the whistleblower's identity. That would have no effect on public opinion whatsoever. How can someone argue that it shouldn't matter with a straight face? Say you believe Schiff and since he was being truthful, there's nothing to worry about. But don't try and sell the idea that if it turns out he was lying, it wouldn't matter. Have some dignity. It would be bad for Schiff...would it change the testimony of these other people? If what they say is true...regardless of Schifff...that is bad for Trump. Schiff's statement would have no bearing on that part, correct? Seems odd to argue...well, Trump did everything they claim, but Schiff lied about the knowing the identity of the WB...so, none of it matters.  Edited November 13 by sho nuff 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McBokonon 436 Posted November 13 2 minutes ago, TheMagus said: I was thinking that Tim was dead wrong about these hearings swaying public opinion. But listening to these opening statements.... it is going to be very difficult to try to paint these guys as partisan witch hunters or somehow reproachable characters. That's why they're probably just going to scream about the whistle-blower over and over and, if he/she is outed and a Democrat, scream about that and nothing else. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FF Ninja 2,784 Posted November 13 3 minutes ago, TheMagus said: I was thinking that Tim was dead wrong about these hearings swaying public opinion. But listening to these opening statements.... it is going to be very difficult to try to paint these guys as partisan witch hunters or somehow reproachable characters. Normally I'd agree, but think about how gullible the audience is that they'd be trying to sell the lie(s) to. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
McBokonon 436 Posted November 13 If Schiff lied that would become the story, full stop. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 So Kiev is pronounced KEEVE (rhymes with Steve)Â Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kal El 1,245 Posted November 13 2 minutes ago, Sinn Fein said: A lot of "Acting" in the titles of Trump appointments... With the President "acting" the way he does, not too surprising. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 10,036 Posted November 13 Bill Taylor: "I encountered an irregular, informal channel of U.S. policymaking with respect to Ukraine, unaccountable to Congress. A channel that included" Kurt Volker, Gordon Sondland, Rick Perry, Mick Mulvaney, and "as I subsequently learned, Mr. Giuliani." 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
badmojo1006 6,014 Posted November 13 Not watching, but is the Republican line of defense that Schiff lied about knowing the whistleblower? Wow, really weak sauce Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites