He was commenting on the phone call that he was listening in on, which we've all read the transcript of.I was very busy today. Is that an actual thing Morrison testified to?
This stain will last for the rest of our/their lives. This era will end, but the actions of those who chose party over country?Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1
SCHIFF: My Republicans colleagues all they seem to be upset about ... is not that the president sought an investigation of his political rival, not that he withheld a W.H. meeting and $400m in aid … their objection is he got caught. Their objection is someone blew the whistle.
Only 35-40%Are people still supporting this president?
Still seems higher than “wacky fringe,” which is all I’d expect to be on board still at this point.Only 35-40%
(what have we become. Or worse yet, what have we always been?).
Dumb comment. Yes, while some are overly consumed with the WB, most are discussing the actual evidence. I think both sides have generally done a good, and respectful job t the witnesses.Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1
SCHIFF: My Republicans colleagues all they seem to be upset about ... is not that the president sought an investigation of his political rival, not that he withheld a W.H. meeting and $400m in aid … their objection is he got caught. Their objection is someone blew the whistle.
I can't claim to be a huge fan of Schiff, but he ended the inquiry with a bang. This was only a part of it. Very impressive.Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1
SCHIFF: My Republicans colleagues all they seem to be upset about ... is not that the president sought an investigation of his political rival, not that he withheld a W.H. meeting and $400m in aid … their objection is he got caught. Their objection is someone blew the whistle.
Agreed. Talk about an intelligent person and talented public speaker. Really well done.I can't claim to be a huge fan of Schiff, but he ended the inquiry with a bang. This was only a part of it. Very impressive.
We’ll get it right after the trade deal with China is completed.It’s also true that they keep saying it’s coming out soon but the timeline keeps getting pushed.
Where do you get that from?
I think one of the concerns might be how he perceived the "demand" from Trump.
It's what Jordan asked and Morrison confirmed tonight. That there was concern about his judgment and he might leak this phone call that the WB reported.I was very busy today. Is that an actual thing Morrison testified to?
Missed it, my youngest son wanted to watch American Dad with me before bed. :(Agreed. Talk about an intelligent person and talented public speaker. Really well done.
It’s far more than the wacky fringe. It’s the right leaning side of “respectful society”Still seems higher than “wacky fringe,” which is all I’d expect to be on board still at this point.
Also that one crazy outspoken Republican congressman (Jim Jordan is it?) cracks me up. The ultimate “NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE DISPERSE” guy.
Of course, the 2nd best of my lifetime behind ReaganAre people still supporting this president?
This is funny...for 3 years been reading on here all these posters with “inside sources” about Trump going down and how involved with Russia etc. and now it starts from the other sideWhat is in these, supposed, reports that you know about yet others are not privy to knowing about? What position in government do you hold that allows you to know things the public won't know until there is a report? What is there to learn? Is this the November surprise we were promised last year?
Ronnie would be embarrassed and ashamed to be mentioned in the same sentence.Of course, the 2nd best of my lifetime behind Reagan
With all due respect Tim, you have no idea how he would feel.Ronnie would be embarrassed and ashamed to be mentioned in the same sentence.
That was pretty well played
Those 2 alphas would be fast friends and I bet Ronald would’ve loved the JR Donald hasRonnie would be embarrassed and ashamed to be mentioned in the same sentence.
I wish this dialogue would die. Those that support the foolishness want to talk about anything but the facts. It's why they throw bait out there like second best president since Raegan. Just seeing which guppy will bite, so the subject can be changed with minutia that doesn't mean anything.Ronnie would be embarrassed and ashamed to be mentioned in the same sentence.
I’m on the opposite side of the spectrum from you. And I would kill for a president like Reagan. And Tim is right — you pee on Reagan’s legacy when you group him with Trump.With all due respect Tim, you have no idea how he would feel.
whoa, I was right there with you until your 2nd sentence. The facts are on the Republicans side here. No witness says there was a crime or bribery, phone transcript is legit and Trump said nothing wrong, aid was delivered, no quid pro quo. This is all on topic and Trump is winning.I wish this dialogue would die. Those that support the foolishness want to talk about anything but the facts. It's why they throw bait out there like second best president since Raegan. Just seeing which guppy will bite, so the subject can be changed with minutia that doesn't mean anything.
Stay on topic. They cannot rebuttal with anything but nonsense if you do.
Well since he’s one of my favorite Americans, since I’ve been to the Reagan Library 4 times and have read several books on the man I think I have SOME idea how he would feel. Just a little.With all due respect Tim, you have no idea how he would feel.
I have no idea how people can not agree that Trump is killing it as President. I get not liking him personally.I’m on the opposite side of the spectrum from you. And I would kill for a president like Reagan. And Tim is right — you pee on Reagan’s legacy when you group him with Trump.
You're distorting the facts to fit what you want to believe instead of what actually happened. And it isn't any more complicated than that.whoa, I was right there with you until your 2nd sentence. The facts are on the Republicans side here. No witness says there was a crime or bribery, phone transcript is legit and Trump said nothing wrong, aid was delivered, no quid pro quo. This is all on topic and Trump is winning.
4 Times!!! Well then, you got me.Well since he’s one of my favorite Americans, since I’ve been to the Reagan Library 4 times and have read several books on the man I think I have SOME idea how he would feel. Just a little.
Well he’s certainly killing something. Oh wait I know: it’s American exceptionalism!I have no idea how people can not agree that Trump is killing it as President. I get not liking him personally.
It’s a great place to go- if you’re a fan you really need to see it sometime.4 Times!!! Well then, you got me.
There are threads for that and it isn’t a positive. Can we please keep this to the impeachment?plus the guy just annexed the formally occupied territories.
It is not the job of a witness to determine if someone committed a crimeNo witness says there was a crime or bribery
I mean a legitimate inquiry into some very questionable actions by POTUS.you mean the witch hunt. sure. i apologize.
Unless someone from the political circle breaks then there isn't one. Only boring facts from trustworthy people with nothing to gain by talking about what actually happened. It's up to the public whether to follow the facts or follow what they want to believe to be the facts.still waiting for bombshell
Here you goMissed it, my youngest son wanted to watch American Dad with me before bed. :(
Fiscal responsibility? Are you giving him a pass due to the Cold War? National debt exploded in the 80s.It’s a great place to go- if you’re a fan you really need to see it sometime.
But I didn’t need to go there to know what he’d think of Donald Trump. Trump has tried to destroy nearly everything that Reagan stood for: internationalism, free trade, open immigration, a path to citizenship for the undocumented, fiscal responsibility and conservatism. And most of all, opposition to tyrants abroad.
Whether the Senate convicts depends on the pressure Senators feel for their jobsAnother day in the books, and it's looking more and more likely that Trump will get impeached, despite the efforts by him and others to keep the truth from coming out. I do think the Senate still doesn't convict, but I've been wrong before.
You have a better chance playing pick up sticks with your butt cheeks than Trump getting removed by the Senate.Another day in the books, and it's looking more and more likely that Trump will get impeached, despite the efforts by him and others to keep the truth from coming out. I do think the Senate still doesn't convict, but I've been wrong before.
I'm very talented.You have a better chance playing pick up sticks with your butt cheeks than Trump getting removed by the Senate.
Schiff has made mistakes but did great here. Almost as good as his Russia “It’s not OK” speech.
Especially if you contrast his closing with that of Nunes. It was five minutes of half truths (and I think I'm being kind) that had practically no bearing on the issues at hand. I recall thinking that Schiff could have made a snarky remark or could have addressed those half-truths one by one, but he stayed on message and above the fray. No link, sorry; you had to be there.Schiff has made mistakes but did great here. Almost as good as his Russia “It’s not OK” speech.
So you’re telling me there’s a chance?You have a better chance playing pick up sticks with your butt cheeks than Trump getting removed by the Senate.
I disagree. In my opinion, Vindman is not a registered Democrat.Of course Vindman is a registered Democrat. He is the leaker who talked with the whistleblower. Pure shenanigans.
Lieutenant Colonel Vindman.Of course Vindman is a registered Democrat. He is the leaker who talked with the whistleblower. Pure shenanigans.