Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I think most people answer it honestly and they would like to see witnesses. I don't believe in the end it's a "I demand witnesses," to the point they're going to put their nickel down and vote a certain way. Sure, they want witnesses. People want a lot of things. I don't know that the witnesses or lack thereof will determine votes.
Ladies and gentlemen, Dershowitz just admitted to Trump trying to start a dictatorship, because what he just said is what dictators do.
People do want lots of things. Like a functioning democracy and separation of powers. Or evidence presented at trials and stuff.
Trump knows what is best for the public interest.Dershowitz just claimed that even if President Trump was looking out for his own political interests when withholding the aid and pushing for the probes, that is still not impeachable.
Dershowitz also claims that Trump's own political interests are in the public interest?
There seems to quite a few things in this bucket. They are all thwarted the interest that keep politicians in office. I won't limit it to just GOP politicians, but they as in the GOP all "fall in line".
For Trump, probably not gonna change any votes but I think it could hurt the individual Senators who are at risk. An independent voter or a never-Trump Republican voter might still vote for a Republican Senator but this could change their mind.
I'm starting to think Dersh is some sort of Soros-funded, Democrat mole. It's more logical than reality.Dershowitz just claimed that even if President Trump was looking out for his own political interests when withholding the aid and pushing for the probes, that is still not impeachable.
Dershowitz also claims that Trump's own political interests are in the public interest?
It could. You're right.
Reality has become a lot more unreal lately, politically anyway. My brain sees the things going on by the GOP, but my logic center is off in Narnia trying to figure out why.
I doubt it, he is an attention, um, hog, and this is his last chance to relevant again. Probably things that people speaking badly about him is better than not speaking of him at all.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
"THIS will get me back into those parties on Martha's Vineyard for sure!"
They were never going to vote for witnesses. Once again. They were never going to vote for witnesses.
I believe so, yes. But facts don't really matter. I just cannot fathom that they are using something they saw on Fox News as a legal defense: "BUT THEY DIDN'T EVEN VOTE."
That wasn't going to happen. Schiff, Nadler, and Pelosi knew it wouldn't happen.
They are going through the court. The Senate is the court with the most powerful judge in the nation presiding.
I thought the Republicans voted against opening the impeachment inquiry because there wasn't enough evidence.
The Senate is also the Senate. And If they don't want to help the House make their case...the House is going to look back and think they should have gone through the courts.
They went to court to fight to get McGahn to testify...in April and are still fighting in courts now. That’s the entire goal - makeup a fake privilege that would take months in court to fight. Then when they finally get resolved, claim that it’s too close to the election and the voters should just decide.
