What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

***OFFICIAL 2019 OFFENSE/DEFENSE CONTEST WEEK 4 (1 Viewer)

Used:

Offense:  BAL, NE, DAL

Defense: BAL, NE, DAL

Week 4:

Offense: L.A. Rams

Defense: L.A. Chargers

 
+41

Used 

Offense - Philly(32)/Cleveland(23)/Dal(31)

Defense - Detroit(27)/Hou(12)/Dal(6)

Week 4

KC / LAR

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cumulative Score: +89

Week 4:

Off:  LAR

Def:  DEN

Previously used:

Off: BAL (59), NE (43), DAL (31)

Def: PHI (-27), CLE (-3), NE (-14)

 
+70

Used
O - PHI, BAL, DAL
D - BAL, NE, DAL

Week 3
O - LA Rams
D - LA Chargers

 
+88

Weeks 1-3

Offense:  New Orleans, New England, Dallas

Defense:  Baltimore, New England, Dallas

Week #4:

Offense:  Kansas City Chiefs

Defense:  Los Angeles Chargers

 
@QuizGuy66 did we elect not to make any rules changes, after the discussion last week?

Just checking in before I make my picks and start logging choices.

 
31

Offense

1: Bucs 17

2: Ravens 23

3: Cowboys 31

4: Seahawks

Defense

1: Broncos -24

2: Patriots 0

3: Packers -16

4: Chargers

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Used:

Offense: Detroit, NE, Dal 

Defense: Baltimore, NE, Dal

Week 4:

Offense: LA Rams

Defense: LA Chargers

 
Arodin said:
Going with LAC/LAC pending any rule changes.
Nothing officially change.  Just an unofficial "grow some balls and don't take both teams vs miami" rule.

Kidding, I greatly appreciate your score tallying.

But still.

 
My "never choose a team facing the Dolphins" has turned into "try to stay in the plus column for the year". 
It's kind of more fun this way, though. 

 
So for all the "everyone just picks the team playing Miami, this is no fun :cry: " crew...those breaking away from the pack and going LAR/LAC were big winners (and Mr. Irrelevant's LAR/Chi double-avoid pick was the best so far).

Reports of this contest's demise seem to have been greatly exaggerated.

That said, locking in my pick for week 5:

Offense:  Bye Week
Defense:  Bye Week

(Expecting a big bounce back from the Miami opponent...)

 
Here we go:

Faust  147
QuizGuy66  117
kutta  115
cdwood  112
TheWinz  108
Dr. Dan  107
Riffraff  106
SayWhat?  103
ZWK  100
Arodin  99
Deamon  93
Pip's Invitation  89
Dr. Octopus  87
IHEARTFF  81
Mr. Irrelevant  79
Obie Wan  78
bro1ncos  55
-OZ-  48
Nugget  44
a_rackowski  31
needanap  31
by_the_sea_wannabe  22
Maggot Brain  20
Neil Beaufort Zod  14
Cowboysfan8  12
Utter Chaos  7
valhallan  -1
jdkapow  -6
scoobus  -10

 
So for all the "everyone just picks the team playing Miami, this is no fun :cry: " crew...those breaking away from the pack and going LAR/LAC were big winners (and Mr. Irrelevant's LAR/Chi double-avoid pick was the best so far).

Reports of this contest's demise seem to have been greatly exaggerated.

That said, locking in my pick for week 5:

Offense:  Bye Week
Defense:  Bye Week

(Expecting a big bounce back from the Miami opponent...)
Of course they were the big winners.  I could win a game of football vs a group of children as well.  Hope you all feel good about yourselves.

I lucked out into a +24 simply by forgetting to make a pick.

Let's see how these cheaters do next week!

 
Of course they were the big winners.  I could win a game of football vs a group of children as well.  Hope you all feel good about yourselves.

I lucked out into a +24 simply by forgetting to make a pick.

Let's see how these cheaters do next week!
Im not sure how picking the Rams vs Tampa and the Bears vs Minnesota was so easy it constituted taking candy from a baby.

Did you miss that Miami was playing LAC?  15 pts less than LAR.

 
Im not sure how picking the Rams vs Tampa and the Bears vs Minnesota was so easy it constituted taking candy from a baby.

Did you miss that Miami was playing LAC?  15 pts less than LAR.
We must have gotten lost in translation there. Didn't say picking the Rams was easy. Those who did deserve points!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top