Godsbrother
Footballguy
MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump and restoring some semblance of sanity and integrity to the oval office.
We are saving ourselves or a future generation from a financial collapse of epic proportions. Much like climate change, it’s a ticking time bomb that will go off.How will our lives be improved in a clear, tangible way if there is no annual deficit?
We are not talking about him in this thread....take it somewhere else.MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump and restoring some semblance of sanity and integrity to the oval office.
Seems like a legitimate position. I could easily be talked into that being my top political priority in terms of how I vote in the next election.We are not talking about him in this thread....take it somewhere else.
You and I are pretty much in agreement here - my only quibble is that while I think Infrastructure is very important, I would push it down the list. It seems like we manage to get stuff taken care of if/when it gets bad enough - generally speaking of course.My personal list, though I've likely forgotten something important.
1. Environmental Policy - This is the number one issue facing humanity right now. Not just coastal communities, but everyone. It includes investing in making the U.S. one of the forefronts for development of cleaner energy tech, which would ensure American leadership into the next century, and cleaning up pollution in the air, soil, and water. And refusing to do business with countries that don't work to clean up their messes in international spaces.
2. Healthcare - not health insurance, healthcare. We need, as a society, to decide that everyone gets access to healthcare. Including and especially mental healthcare. This is not just a moral issue, it's a crime reduction issue and an economic growth issue.
3. Social Safety Net In General - goes with healthcare, and is the backbone of lowering crime rates - especially crimes of desperation - in this country, and is also an economic growth issue.
4. Infrastructure - self explanatory.
5. Money In Politics - we have to do something about this. The country spent $2.4 billion on the 2016 presidential race. That's ridiculous. That much money means big donors, pacs, and multinational corporations have insane amounts of influence on policy. That has to change.
It was in Tim’s instructions not mine.Seems like a legitimate position. I could easily be talked into that being my top political priority in terms of how I vote in the next election.
Right, but it's not an issue for the thread. I just don't want to discuss personalities.Seems like a legitimate position. I could easily be talked into that being my top political priority in terms of how I vote in the next election.
Please accept my apologies. Taking personalities out of it, my priorities are:We are not talking about him in this thread....take it somewhere else.
That's not a great way to manage things. Costly and inefficient at best. Catastrophic outcomes at worst. Energy (generation and distribution), cybersecurity, network infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, water utilization/infrastructure - all these things are in desperate need of overhauls and improvements.It seems like we manage to get stuff taken care of if/when it gets bad enough - generally speaking of course.
Again, I'm willing to revisit this in 13 months but right now I think we just play out the string and see where we are at - I do fear what a lame duck Trump could be capable of trying but quite a bit of the "bad" stuff he's tried has been shot down. I think if the Dems do well in 2020 it will embolden Republicans to put Trump in check if he manages to win next November.MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump and restoring some semblance of sanity and integrity to the oval office.
The criticism I have read against the fair tax is that it's based on consumption, and that it would therefore favor the wealthy at the expense of the poor. What say you to this?True tax reform (Fair tax)
I don't disagree but we were asked to prioritize, I'm not downplaying it and thankfully we have the ability to multitask, even if we never do it. I just don't think it's more important than the things I listed. Things keep moving along and while there's the occasional issue for the most part once it reaches critical mass we react. You are completely correct that it's not a great way to tackle things but it's better than never getting done.That's not a great way to manage things. Costly and inefficient at best. Catastrophic outcomes at worst. Energy (generation and distribution), cybersecurity, network infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, water utilization/infrastructure - all these things are in desperate need of overhauls and improvements.
Food (groceries) and clothing would be exempt from the Fair tax. For other stuff there are ways to fix this such as periodic rebates to the poor.The criticism I have read against the fair tax is that it's based on consumption, and that it would therefore favor the wealthy at the expense of the poor. What say you to this?
Relative to the overall federal budget and/or GDP, that is a ridiculous amount. Ridiculously small, that is. (That paper was published in 2003 under the old policy regime, but the basic point remains -- it's very difficult to explain why there is so little money in politics unless you view political donations as mostly a consumption good).5. Money In Politics - we have to do something about this. The country spent $2.4 billion on the 2016 presidential race. That's ridiculous.
This is basically it for me too. I care about lots of policy issues, but Item #1 is restoring the democratic norms that have been eroded during this administration. If the Democrats nominate a candidate who will commit to that, I'll take policy losses in other areas.MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump and restoring some semblance of sanity and integrity to the oval office.
1. We're not talking about federal budget money. We're talking about money in general.Relative to the overall federal budget and/or GDP, that is a ridiculous amount. Ridiculously small, that is. (That paper was published in 2003 under the old policy regime, but the basic point remains -- it's very difficult to explain why there is so little money in politics unless you view political donations as mostly a consumption good).
Strictly for the purpose of this thread, let's assume that Trump doesn't exist.This is basically it for me too. I care about lots of policy issues, but Item #1 is restoring the democratic norms that have been eroded during this administration. If the Democrats nominate a candidate who will commit to that, I'll take policy losses in other areas.
Climate changeStrictly for the purpose of this thread, let's assume that Trump doesn't exist.
So what then are the issues that are important to you?
Yep, knew I missed something. This would definitely bump campaign finance off of my list.Climate change
Free speech / free press
Marijuana legalization
IP reform
(Off the top of my head)
MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump and restoring some semblance of sanity and integrity to the oval office.
I would have to imagine that a candidate that HAS A PLAN TO ADDRESS the majority of the issues discussed in this thread should be able to defeat TrumpThis is basically it for me too. I care about lots of policy issues, but Item #1 is restoring the democratic norms that have been eroded during this administration. If the Democrats nominate a candidate who will commit to that, I'll take policy losses in other areas.
Wait. So a candidate that solves climate change, universal medicare, social secutiry reform, rebuilds our infrastructure, creates a "fair" fair tax and legalizes pot could defeat Trump? Man I don't know..that seems like a stretch to me.I would have to imagine that a candidate that tackles the majority of the issues discussed in this thread should be able to defeat Trump
Right, I definitely meant they had to solve it on day one.Wait. So a candidate that solves climate change, universal medicare, social secutiry reform, rebuilds our infrastructure, creates a "fair" fair tax and legalizes pot could defeat Trump? Man I don't know..that seems like a stretch to me.
Just ribbing you. I mean that would pretty much be the perfect candidate right?Right, I definitely meant they had to solve it on day one.
Haha I know... it would mean BernieJust ribbing you. I mean that would pretty much be the perfect candidate right?
I'm glad he pointed that out, then. Until he did, I didn't realize that by "tackle" you meant "solve." You should be more careful with your words. If I may be so bold, I understand that there's someone who has the very best words you may want to hire if he's out of a job in a year or so.Right, I definitely meant they had to solve it on day one.
Cept he might not make it a year. Bernie needs to chill.Haha I know... it would mean Bernie
Done. Money is already not speech.wikkidpissah said:only one - money is not speech. caring about the others before addressing that is a waste of time
I have the most luxurious words, they're perfect reallyI'm glad he pointed that out, then. Until he did, I didn't realize that by "tackle" you meant "solve." You should be more careful with your words. If I may be so bold, I understand that there's someone who has the very best words you may want to hire if he's out of a job in a year or so.
Mine are far more bigly luxurious. And the best words. You can't even believe how great these words are they are so great.I have the most luxurious words, they're perfect really
You may have already seen this, but we as a nation spend more on almonds than we do on politics. (Not just political campaigns, but also PACs, lobbying, think tanks, advocacy organizations...)Relative to the overall federal budget and/or GDP, that is a ridiculous amount. Ridiculously small, that is. (That paper was published in 2003 under the old policy regime, but the basic point remains -- it's very difficult to explain why there is so little money in politics unless you view political donations as mostly a consumption good).
And herein lies the problem with American politics.MY #1 issue is getting rid of Trump
Almonds are available every single day.You may have already seen this, but we as a nation spend more on almonds than we do on politics.
Great list.These came to mind first
#1 - Money in politics - Nothing else really truly matters until we stop politicians from being bought off. But good luck with a solution when the people that make the laws are the ones involved in being bought.
#2 - Taxes - All these programs that people want and to pay for it by "taxing the wealthy" is mostly nonsense when the filthy rich have so many tax breaks at their disposal. Fix the tax code and then start figuring out what programs should be funded.
#3 - Healthcare Industry - This isn't just about health insurance companies. It's about the ridiculous cost of drugs, doctors forcing patients in for office visits before seeing specialists (with stupid co-pays since ObamaCare), and stupid costs for health procedures. Put some price control on this crap instead of arguing about single payer or the health insurance companies first.
Almonds actually do their job to keep me healthy.You may have already seen this, but we as a nation spend more on almonds than we do on politics.
So are lobbying, think tanks, etc.Almonds are available every single day.
Not going to hijack the thread more than I already did by responding. This intended to be a personality-free thread.And herein lies the problem with American politics.
Are they? Every single day?So are lobbying, think tanks, etc.
Your teens?I love pairing almonds and Riesling. But I'm entering the "daily glass of red wine, leer at middle-aged neighborhood ladies, be rude to people higher up the economic ladder than me" stage of life.
I have a feeling that 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10 would do a lot for 2. And 1, frankly.My list.
1. Democracy -- remove barriers to voting, deter foreign interference in elections, improve transparency and oversight...
2. Homelessness.
3. Criminal justice reform (including drug policy -- harm reduction rather than criminal prosecution).
4. Climate change.
5. Free Speech.
6. Unemployment.
7. Immigration.
8. Animal rights (factory farms).
9. Healthcare cost containment.
10. Education cost containment.
i like mustard pretzels and pinot noirI love pairing almonds and Riesling. But I'm entering the "daily glass of red wine, leer at middle-aged neighborhood ladies, be rude to people higher up the economic ladder than me" stage of life.
It’s a good thing this is the political forumtimschochet said:. This is a thread devoted to political issues
No problem. It’s all good.Please accept my apologies. Taking personalities out of it, my priorities are:
Climate Change
Universal Health Care
True tax reform (Fair tax)