Looks like it should be a decent match up, BUT that Chicago offense has been pretty awful. I don't trust the offense, nor do I trust the coach's ability to game plan. I will not be playing Montgomery in cash games.I think there's actual value at RB this week with Montgomery at 6.4K and Singletary at 6.7K even for cash. Pair them up with CMC. I haven't put any lineups together yet though.
A TE in the flex? Not something I would ever do. I'll assume it is a gpp line up though and I only play cash. It is also hard for me to get excited about Montgomery because I do not trust the Chicago offense at all. I feel I want more certainty out of my RB spots (again, my cash game mentality). That said he has produced the last couple weeks, so what the hell do I know.Thoughts?
JWinston, Montgomery,R Jones II, Julio Jones,M Evans, Golladay, Jonnu Smith, A Hooper, AR
It was all the cash I had left and that game is the highest Vegas total on the board. Could have squeezed OBJ in but my faith in Cleveland's offense is the same as that of the BearsA TE in the flex? Not something I would ever do. I'll assume it is a gpp line up though and I only play cash. It is also hard for me to get excited about Montgomery because I do not trust the Chicago offense at all. I feel I want more certainty out of my RB spots (again, my cash game mentality). That said he has produced the last couple weeks, so what the hell do I know.
A TE in the flex? Not something I would ever do. I'll assume it is a gpp line up though and I only play cash. It is also hard for me to get excited about Montgomery because I do not trust the Chicago offense at all. I feel I want more certainty out of my RB spots (again, my cash game mentality). That said he has produced the last couple weeks, so what the hell do I know.
I am with Galileo on this one. I personally very rarely deviate from 3 RBs on FD just because they usually have a lot more opps at scoring TD, which you need in this format. I guess Hooper has hit 3x a couple times this year, it's just that TE is such a volatile position historically. Just don't know if 2TEs are the way to go for a LU on FD. What are the odds that both of those score more than what you could combine that salary and get at other positions?It was all the cash I had left and that game is the highest Vegas total on the board. Could have squeezed OBJ in but my faith in Cleveland's offense is the same as that of the Bears
With that build, my instinct would be to go Tate or Crowder, Kirk, and Ridley. But do you already have Barkley and Ellison in that LU?I keep looking for ways to squeeze Jackson, McCaffrey, and Barkley into the same line up. It can be done, but with the value buys I already have at TE and Def., I am left with 17,400 for my 3 WR spots (5800 average). There are several guys around that price point (from 5300-6400) that could potentially contribute enough for a successful cash game line up, but I don't have great confidence in any of them.
Pascal, Tate, Landry, Anderson, J Brown, Parker, Moore, Kirk, Boyd, Ridley. At least three of those guys will produce something, right? Now, which ones...lol? The bolded are currently in my line up, but I seem to change the combination every few minutes. I guess I could always stop trying to squeeze those high dollar guys...
Currently have Jackson, CMC, Barkley, R. Jones, Pascal, Kirk, Ridley, Smith, CLEWith that build, my instinct would be to go Tate or Crowder, Kirk, and Ridley. But do you already have Barkley and Ellison in that LU?