Casting Couch
Footballguy
SPOILER ALERT BRO!!!!
The Spoiler is Jimmy Hoffa is encased in concrete at the friendly confines of Arrowhead Stadium.that isnt a spoiler
SPOILER ALERT BRO!!!!
The Spoiler is Jimmy Hoffa is encased in concrete at the friendly confines of Arrowhead Stadium.that isnt a spoiler
its a fantasy football forum where you bring things up for discussion.....you are allowed to play what ifs.....simply saying if money isn't a factor....would it be a good idea....its not a difficult question.....why pose the question if you are ignoring money....money is absolutely a factor....and who knows what happens to Mahoms over the next 12 years....most qbs seem to be in their prime at about 25-29.....Mahomes is 24....it might take a year to secure funding and a site....then 2 or 3 years to build the thing....then Mahomes is on his second contract and the advantage is officially lost....I wish I could take money out of every decision I make.....
So you're in favor of spending a billion dollars building a stadium around a player?its a fantasy football forum where you bring things up for discussion.....you are allowed to play what ifs.....simply saying if money isn't a factor....would it be a good idea....its not a difficult question.....
for instance....would the makeup of the Rams greatest show on turf be as effective all year long and especially in the playoffs if they were in ....I don't know....Green Bay....?......did they maybe have an advantage in Dec and Jan if playing indoors....would the other team rather play them in snow and 40 mph winds...?
would the Rams have created their team differently if not in a dome......did they draft or acquire free agents based on being indoors....I'm simply saying what about doing it the other way around....recognize your pieces and build a stadium that puts them in the best position to succeed...
I'm not spending anything....but if it means winning maybe several super bowls over the next few years......hell yeah.....So you're in favor of spending a billion dollars building a stadium around a player?
C'mon man. Having a dome vs an outdoor stadium isn't going to be the differentiator between winning several super bowls and winning none. This just keeps getting more ridiculous.I'm not spending anything....but if it means winning maybe several super bowls over the next few years......hell yeah.....
again....IF MONEY IS NOT AN ISSUE....do you think it would maybe be a good idea...?
you still wont answer the question ...."if money was not an issue"......you probably wont because you know the answer....but thats okay...keep going down that rabbit hole....I'm just throwing out an idea for discussion....wouldnt it make more sense, and cost far less money, to build your team around your environment? Isnt thatbwhat the greatest show on turf did? recognized that they play I games on turf and went after guys who could run? They didn't build a dome after they saw what they had. They built the team around their environment. if you play outside in December and January, doesnt it make sense to draft a guy who has had success in the cold?
Isnt it better to look for an advantage of 22 players and not just one? Playing outside in the later part of the year is a big advantage for the home team. always has been. So you put a dome, for free, on top of arrowhead- because you're afraid mahomes cant perform in bad weather (then hes not as good as you think), isnt that leveling thenplayong field? playing in a dome is better for the visiting team, no matter who your qb is. and what if your QB is hurt? there goes any advantage.
I'd rather play for the advantage of 22 guys. not 1.
You asked if the Chiefs should consider it and the answer is it's not a good business decision.you still wont answer the question ...."if money was not an issue"......you probably wont because you know the answer....but thats okay...keep going down that rabbit hole....I'm just throwing out an idea for discussion....
a generational talent....AT QB....again "AT QB"......is not an everyday thing (if you want to argue Mahomes is not a generational type talent, thats another discussion and changes everything)....but if there is aplayer that should make you have these discussions.....I would argue.....its him....
your comments about the greatest show on turf, proved my point.....I was just saying do it in the opposite....
(bolded) in part because they moved....C'mon man. Having a dome vs an outdoor stadium isn't going to be the differentiator between winning several super bowls and winning none. This just keeps getting more ridiculous.
Building a stadium around a particular player or style of play is not a good idea. Both are exceedingly temporary. Earlier you mentioned the Rams. The Greatest Show on Turf lasted three seasons.
fair enough....II'll give you that even if it might not be correct.....You asked if the Chiefs should consider it and the answer is it's not a good business decision.
I lived in Minneapolis for a year in 1996. I didn't meet one Minnesotan that knew anything about football. A lot of them preferred pro wrestling to football. They would talk smack about the Packers but they knew little about their own team. I do come from Wisconsin where most of my friends' 70 year old mothers can name all 5 starting offensive linemen for the Packers. I could see the Vikings having much more demand for tickets in a dome. Literally fair weather fans.Tradition exceeds Minnesota? Why would you say that?
WTF? Seriously?(bolded) in part because they moved....
Read what you just wrote.fair enough....II'll give you that even if it might not be correct.....
but..... if possible and money was not an issue......could it be a good football only decision....?....
lets say that as an owner.......you could afford to lose several billion.....but maybe win 10 super bowls.....
I'm just saying where you play makes a difference.....and the players....if you know you are going to have somebody like Mahomes on lock down.....it changes thingsWTF? Seriously?
Greatest Show on Turf was 1999-2001.
The Rams played in the Edward Jones Dome in STL through the 2015 season.
again TAKE $$ OUT of the equation....Read what you just wrote.
Weather conditions impact both teams, so I don't have a preference. Maybe the opposing QB would be even more crippled by snow and 40 MPH winds than Mahomes. So your notion that having a dome would necessarily be an advantage for KC is specious at best. Maybe they get a bigger advantage playing outdoors than indoors.again TAKE $$ OUT of the equation....
do you prefer your QB (Mahomes) for the next 15 years playing in perfect conditions in DEC and JAN or possibly playing in snow and 40 MPH winds...
The problem is that you can't take money out of this discussion and have a logical discussion. Then again, logic has been thrown out the window since KC is winning 10 SBs by building a dome over Mahomes.again TAKE $$ OUT of the equation....
do you prefer your QB (Mahomes) for the next 15 years playing in perfect conditions in DEC and JAN or possibly playing in snow and 40 MPH winds...
Are you assuming they play all December and playoff games at home?what I'm getting at is the Chiefs aren't going to let Mahomes go anywhere....so why not take bad weather out of the equation.....they could go 16-0 and then run into snow and 40 mph winds in Dec and Jan and its all for naught....
If money were not a factor, it could be fun watching them play on the moon.again TAKE $$ OUT of the equation....
do you prefer your QB (Mahomes) for the next 15 years playing in perfect conditions in DEC and JAN or possibly playing in snow and 40 MPH winds...
Sure, tax payers love giving money to billionaires so millionaires can play a game.lol....bringing money back in just for fun....they are getting ready to spend $40 million plus on the dude for the next 15 years.....why not try to swing for the fences.....the tax payers would probably be all over it and help out big time.....put something on the table right now in that area and see if a tax increase passes to help pay...
Yes, that global warming necessitates domes for everyoneEvery stadium should have a dome in the United States, especially with how bad weather is getting.
Wait until you see what happens to John Kennedy - shocking.I didn’t know it was 3.5 hours long or about mobsters.
Did something happen to Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana?Wait until you see what happens to John Kennedy - shocking.
How much carbon does it take to produce those materials and build the dome? and then when a dome is on, the stadium needs to be heated... which, you know, requires fossil fuel, or solar panels, but then those require energy and mined metals to be built too. We're doomed. just ban stadiums. That whole moon idea is looking better and betterYes, that global warming necessitates domes for everyone
Tall pocket passer with big hands. He was made for bad weather.Tom Brady has played in the New England area his entire career and seems to have done just fine despite some cold weather and snowy playoff games.
Coffin cornerSome feel Hoffa is buried in cement in one of the old Giants stadium end zones.
The Purple People eaters were awesome. December games, late afternoon, with the sun already going down since it is Minnesota, with shots out over the fields and river, steam rising, Bud Grant in short sleeves, Marshall, Page, Eller and Larsen breathing steam with mud and blood frozen to their wrapped hands, incredible. Then, with the advent of the Humperdome they and their crowd went to eating quiche and drinking white wine spritzers in a climate controlled environment and the roof fell in, figuratively and literally. They got Les Steckel, and deserved him. They sold their soul. and it turns out the devil never pays, but always collects.I don't know, but I do know that when Minnesota went from playing outdoors to a dome they lost their winter home field advantage. Now Minnesota is colder than Kansas City, but it is something to consider. Southern or dome teams hated coming to Metropolitan stadium. Just look at the advantage the Patriots have in December and January. I couldn't imagine the Packers ever making this mistake.
Yea. That.The Purple People eaters were awesome. December games, late afternoon, with the sun already going down since it is Minnesota, with shots our over the fields and river, steam rising, Bud Grant in short sleeves, Marshall, Page, Eller and Larsen breathing steam with mud and blood frozen to their wrapped hands, incredible. Then, with the advent of the Humperdome they and their crowd went to eating quiche and drinking white wine spritzers in a climate controlled environment and the roof fell in, figuratively and literally. They got Les Steckel, and deserved him. They sold their soul. and it turns out the devil never pays, but always collects.
I think it'd be cool if Lambeau was the only outdoor stadium left. Sort of like when the Cubs were the only team in mlb without lights and only played day games. I like tradition but the tradition of football is playing in fall, not winter. I think some fans like going to games in brutal conditions because they think it proves their dedication as a fan. Not me.When you think of great, storied, NFL stadiums, how many are domes?
Lambeau, soldier Field, Arrowhead, Heinz...
That seems debatable. As kids, near Detroit, we played every new years day, in the cold. There wasn't always snow but it happened enough. Some of the most memorable games were in the snow. All championships have been in the winter.I think it'd be cool if Lambeau was the only outdoor stadium left. Sort of like when the Cubs were the only team in mlb without lights and only played day games. I like tradition but the tradition of football is playing in fall, not winter. I think some fans like going to games in brutal conditions because they think it proves their dedication as a fan. Not me.
Early championships were in early December. And that was later in the year than the game traditionally had been played. A crisp autumn day is the perfect football weather.All championships have been in the winter.
we are all moving under ground in the future, we should start building subterrain stadiums now.JohnnyU said:Yes, that global warming necessitates domes for everyone
The rolling roof was in the original design.Ted Lange as your Bartender said:TIL that a “rolling roof” concept was developed for the KC Stadium complex but funding for it was voted down
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PXvvZEzpWYU
Home bunker advantage.we are all moving under ground in the future, we should start building subterrain stadiums now.
You said KC could "maybe win 10 super bowls". If you're salty because the convo got sidetracked by that, then that's a you problem.in typical fashion around here for some....I just posted a hypothetical question for discussion.....if it was something they should consider.....taking money out of it, but some can't do that and continued to get hung up on it.....never said KC would win 10 SB's.....but somebody twists it that way....it wasn't about money or super bowls....it was about would it make sense philosophically/strategy wise.....people didn't want to answer that question....what conditions you would want Mahomes and his team to play in if given the option , etc....lol....cheers....
so could the Bengals....You said KC could "maybe win 10 super bowls". If you're salty because the convo got sidetracked by that, then that's a you problem.
Regardless, plenty of people answered your question. The consensus is no.
Jerry World and the Minnesota dome is awesome.....Heinz is just a stadium with a view, same with Lambeau except no view. I been to over half of the ones in the league.When you think of great, storied, NFL stadiums, how many are domes?
Lambeau, soldier Field, Arrowhead, Heinz...
Soldier Field is incredible even though it's nothing compared to the huge, fancy new stadiumsJerry World and the Minnesota dome is awesome.....Heinz is just a stadium with a view, same with Lambeau except no view. I been to over half of the ones in the league.