What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Democratic Party is Pretend Opposition to Trump (1 Viewer)

ren hoek

Footballguy
Wow, that is some resistance they are doing to Trump. With an opposition party like this, who needs the GOP?  

House passes defense bill to establish Space Force, paid family leave for federal workers

The House on Wednesday easily passed the compromise defense policy bill that would grant federal workers 12 weeks of paid parental leave and create a new branch of the military dedicated to space.

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) passed in a 377-48 vote, with many "no" votes coming from progressive Democrats upset after several of their priorities were removed from the legislation. In all, 41 Democrats and 6 Republicans voted "no."

The compromise bill picked up Republican support that was absent when the House passed its original version of the defense legislation in July, allowing the chamber to send the $738 billion bill to the Senate.

"This was not an easy process," House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said ahead of the vote. "We have a divided government. We have a Republican president, a Republican Senate and Democratic House who do not agree on a lot of issues, and those are the issues that tend to get focused on. But what this conference report reflects for the most part is that we do agree on a lot."

Rep. Mac Thornberry (Texas), the top Republican on the committee who voted against the House version in July, added that the final bill is "good for the troops, and it is good for national security, and when it comes to a defense authorization bill, that's all that really matters."

House passage of the NDAA comes two days after the compromise bill was unveiled following months of negotiations between the Democratic-led House, GOP-led Senate and the White House.

President Trump has said he will sign the compromise bill.

"Wow! All of our priorities have made it into the final NDAA: Pay Raise for our Troops, Rebuilding our Military, Paid Parental Leave, Border Security, and Space Force! Congress - don't delay this anymore! I will sign this historic defense legislation immediately!" Trump tweeted Wednesday morning.

Negotiators said throughout the months-long talks that the main stumbling blocks were provisions related to Trump's border wall.

The original House bill would have blocked Trump from dipping into Pentagon funds for the wall after he tapped $6.1 billion from the department for his signature project.

Ultimately, negotiators decided to leave out wall-related provisions, kicking the issue to the ongoing appropriations process.

The final bill also dropped a slew of other Democratic priorities that were in the House bill, including language to reverse Trump's transgender military ban, block Trump from taking military action against Iran, end all U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, force the cleanup of cancer-linked "forever chemicals" called PFAS, block the deployment of the low-yield nuclear warhead and ban new transfers to the Guantánamo Bay detention center.

Democrats did secure a major win in the bill with the inclusion of a policy that would grant all federal workers 12 weeks of paid parental leave in what's being touted as a historic deal to give the benefit to more than 2 million Americans for the first time ever.

Progressives, though, balked over the proposals excluded from the final bill.

"There are many things you can call the bill, but it's Orwellian to call it progressive," Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said Wednesday.

Still, Smith has defended the bill as "the most progressive defense bill in the history of the country, with Donald Trump as president and Jim Inhofe as chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee."

"Throughout the negotiations I failed in one way: I was unable to turn President Trump, [Senate Majority] Leader [Mitch] McConnell [R-Ky.] and Chairman [James] Inhofe [R-Okla.] into Democrats and convince them to suddenly accept all of the provisions they despise," Smith added in a lengthy statement ahead of Wednesday's vote.

"Nonetheless, we have accomplished more with this bill than anyone ever thought possible given the realities of a Trump White House and a Republican-controlled Senate, and we should be proud of that."

The Democratic chairman said that Trump and GOP leaders "would have killed the bill over these provisions" and without the bill "we would have gotten nothing."

In a win for Trump and Republicans, the bill would also create Space Force - a new branch of the military aimed at protecting U.S. space assets from threats from Russia and China.

The service - which was first proposed by the House in 2017 as Space Corps - has become a top priority for Trump as it elicits huge applause at his rallies.

Space Force would be housed in the Department of the Air Force in a structure similar to the Marine Corps's relationship to the Department of the Navy. The service would be led by the chief of space operations, who would report directly to the secretary of the Air Force and become a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

"People have been trying to kill this baby in the womb for the last three years, and I believe there is going to be some people who want to see it die in the crib," Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), one of the chief proponents of Space Force, told reporters about opposition to the service. "We're not going to let that happen."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doing something Dems.  Haven't read through it all yet, but looks like a compromise to get the paid family leave in the bill.  Sort of how it should work, no? 

 
Space Force would be housed in the Department of the Air Force in a structure similar to the Marine Corps's relationship to the Department of the Navy.
Seems like a good way to structure it since the Air Force would be [has been] involved w/ or w/o a separate branch created.   

 
Doing something Dems.  Haven't read through it all yet, but looks like a compromise to get the paid family leave in the bill.  Sort of how it should work, no? 
https://twitter.com/keanebhatt/status/1204924434391408641

Ivanka Trump wanted paid family leave from the very beginning.  Dems didn’t have to fight for that.  

As far as ending US’ participation in wars in the Middle East, it appears they exercised no leverage at all, to the extent they even wanted to contest Trump’s wars in the first place.  They removed provisions that would have blocked a war with Iran and US support for the Saudi genocide in Yemen.  Horrible.  

 
beef said:
:thumbup:   Glad she helped out then.  That's been a long-time policy goal of Democrats.   
Yeah I was more concerned about the mass killing thing, but glad Ivanka could finally bring it home for them 👍

 
Pro-war Democrats moving on up 

Hawkish Dem Sherman is Next in Line to Replace Engel as Foreign Affairs Chairman

Rep. Brad Sherman, the California Democrat who is next in line based on seniority to replace Engel and is one of the candidates jockeying for the position, doesn’t promise a radical departure from the norm on international issues—and his positions are backed up with cash from the defense industry and backers of Israel. 

The Foreign Affairs Committee jurisdiction covers war powers and the deployment and use of United States Armed Forces, arms controls and exports, national security developments affecting foreign policy, and more, according to its website.

Beth Miller, government affairs manager at Jewish Voice for Peace Action, was highly critical of Sherman’s record on the conflict in a statement to Sludge. 

“Rep. Sherman, like Rep. Engel, doesn’t believe Palestinians should be granted full human and equal rights,” said Miller. “This kind of racism is simply unacceptable in any Democratic leadership position. A Sherman chairmanship would put the House Foreign Affairs Committee directly at odds with rapidly growing progressive movements across the U.S. that are embracing demands for Palestinian freedom and to divest U.S. money from Israel’s violent oppression of Palestinians.”

In 2017, Sherman co-sponsored a Republican resolution expressing opposing a United Nation’s resolution that said Israel’s settlements in Palestinian territories constitute a “flagrant violation” of international law. That same year he co-sponsored a bill from Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.) to prohibit U.S. companies from joining boycotts against Israel. Sherman also voted for the Iraq War and opposed former President Barack Obama’s Iran nuclear deal. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top