Stinkin Ref
IBL Representative
Uh....a non raider homer POV"Non homer" point of view. That is funny. Your entire posts was a homer POV.
Uh....a non raider homer POV"Non homer" point of view. That is funny. Your entire posts was a homer POV.
Lol...you couldn’t understand that from the initial post....?.. raiderfans.... ....lolMuch more accurate statement
Raiders are ranked as the 6th best LB unit.
I believe we resigned him a few months ago, so he's still on the roster.Do you guys still have Justin Phillips? He shined in the Cowboys preseason games and I was pissed we let him go.
Did he make any impression on you guys? Seems to have the ball hawk trait.
I don't know if he has Hill upside, but I think his main role is going to be motioned out of the backfield and lining up on the line. He won't be a RB or a WR, and simply be a "Weapon X."Bowden is the wildcard of all rookies. I believe they should be lining him up as a WR not RB. I believe he has Tyreek Hill upside, but if they just use him as a gadget player he won't be what I believe he can be.
Reminds me of another Kentucky guy... Randle Cobb (The Touchdown Robber Cobber).I don't know if he has Hill upside, but I think his main role is going to be motioned out of the backfield and lining up on the line. He won't be a RB or a WR, and simply be a "Weapon X."
I agree with a lot of similarities to Cobb, especially Bowden's last season, but I think he could be a better receiver than Cobb and more dynamic.Reminds me of another Kentucky guy... Randle Cobb (The Touchdown Robber Cobber).
The thing I like most about the 3 WRs taken in this draft (yes 3; I'm counting Bowden as such until I see him actually playing RB) is that they all bring very different elements - each at a very high level in terms of what he can specifically do. They compliment one another. Hard to imagine 3 rookie WRs being able to do that. Makes is much more palatable having taken 3 WRs in the first 3 rounds. Also like that Bowden can play KR/PR and Ruggs KR.
Remember how they used Garner? Like 90 catches? I am thinking this will be an updated version of that to supplement Jacobs. Hence the RB designation.Bowden is the wildcard of all rookies. I believe they should be lining him up as a WR not RB. I believe he has Tyreek Hill upside, but if they just use him as a gadget player he won't be what I believe he can be.
I would hope they use Jacobs himself more in the passing game -- guy has great hands.Chadstroma said:Remember how they used Garner? Like 90 catches? I am thinking this will be an updated version of that to supplement Jacobs. Hence the RB designation.
I like it. Super low risk signing and see if he has anything. He had some flashes in Cinncy, maybe he's been working his *** off for the last year and is in great shape. If not, then cut him. I guess will be him and Rod Smith competing for that "big back" role?Jeremy Hill announced he signed with the Raiders.
*vulturing goal line carries from Jacobs.I guess will be him and Rod Smith competing for that "big back" role?
Will wait to see but Jacobs was a beast at the goaline and personally I'm not worried about it until I hear or see otherwise. They're fighting for the 3rd/4th string back and to help spell Jacobs on the early downs imo.*vulturing goal line carries from Jacobs.
Agree but tend to think Hill is past prime and likely just depth for losing Booker to the COVID.I like it. Super low risk signing and see if he has anything. He had some flashes in Cinncy, maybe he's been working his *** off for the last year and is in great shape. If not, then cut him. I guess will be him and Rod Smith competing for that "big back" role?
Failed his physical with the Vikes. https://twitter.com/Vikings/status/1290750366397718530Chadstroma said:Apparently we actually traded Hall to the Vikings for a conditional pick.
That may be 20-20 hindsight.Failed his physical with the Vikes. https://twitter.com/Vikings/status/1290750366397718530
Never understood this pick when it happened. A stroll down memory shows that D.J. Chark went 4 picks later and Fred Warner went 13 picks later.
The bolded area the the questions/concerns that I had when the pick was announced. Sam Houston is an FBS program so that should have been the first red flag. I know there are lots of examples of FBS players making it big time, like Carson Wentz, but the pick was generally considered a reach at the time. When you add that fact to his size concerns I never understood the pick.That may be 20-20 hindsight.
I was scratching my head at the pick but only because I didn't know a lot about the guy. It's not like another DT leapt off the board at me. Remember there being a lot of ends going in the draft, but not a lot of depth at tackle (Hall was the second DT off the board in that draft) and Hall at least had the ability out of college to line up all over the field as a 2-way down lineman, had some athleticism (had a pretty fast 40 time IIRC), and was seen as a raw athletic talent whose one true knock was that he may be undersized for the next level.
In the end, it was laziness that seemed to do him in.
I hate it when discussing keeps going on.If I'm talking to a Raider fan, about Ruggs in the slot, and he says, ""But what about Renfrow?", I would look for a way to end the discussing quickly.
Agree, but want to avoid crossing the line into gadgetry.Overall, I think this offensive identity will be flexibility. They will have very different looks game to game and even play to play.
Gruden loves taking things from others and incorporating it into his scheme. His offense isn't the WCO base it was the first time around. He sat in his TB home office watching tap and drawing up new plays for all those years not coaching. It has evolved and they have signaled they are going to be adaptive with the offense. If you look at ths personal we have on roster at skill positions it makes sense that is what they are doing but yes, I don't think Gruden will ever get away from running.Agree, but want to avoid crossing the line into gadgetry.
I don't think that's the Gruden way. In my mind his approach overalying a solid base of consistent ball control/move the chains smashmouth offensive gameplan with constant moving, shifting, and disguising based on exploiting holes in the D.
Gruden is a chess tactician with a deep playbook that I think we've only seen a fraction of. Excited to see more, but I'd rather be known for being successful running the ball down throats with Jacobs and a huge line that you just can't stop even though you know it's a run play, than constant gadgetry, which isn't a lasting plan of success.
That's just me.
He was talking about all the other starting QBs that have been in the QB room that he has had to hold off. Who is he talking about?If you fast forward to 6 minutes in...
https://youtu.be/yq5dgQ_AjHM
...Derek does not look at all comfortable talking about Mariota being there.
Anyone know if you can actually play through a torn labrum. I know nothing about the doctor stuff, so itcould be a torn labia for all I know.Las Vegas Raiders wide receiver Tyrell Williams has a torn labrum in his shoulder, Rapoport reported, per sources. He's going to try to play through it after rehabbing for a few weeks, Rapoport added.
Vic Tafurjoey said:Anyone know if you can actually play through a torn labrum. I know nothing about the doctor stuff, so itcould be a torn labia for all I know.
Thank goodness the Raiders loaded up at WR in the draft and offseason. Last years thin WR Corp was no funICON211 said:Williams is pretty good, but this just gives the young guys more opportunity. I really like the way Edwards, Ruggs and Renfrow's skill set compliment each other.