gianmarco
Footballguy
Italy actually locked down pretty quickly. They took far more measures earlier on than we have here.this is a good thing, not a bad thing. We want to be South Korea/China...not Italy/Iran.
That's what is so bad.
Italy actually locked down pretty quickly. They took far more measures earlier on than we have here.this is a good thing, not a bad thing. We want to be South Korea/China...not Italy/Iran.
So I just finished a 9 day course of prednisone today and I’m worried. I’m not sure how long it takes for my immune system to return to normal.This pisses me off. They gave the guy steroids which if you read reports is a major no no since it weakens immune system.
At least you'll get to learn that new math.So along with WFH I will be my kids teacher apparently. The schools sent home big packs of stuff we have to go over. The wife is a PT so she has to go into the hospitals.
They’re not going to able to tell you, as COVID antibody tests to show resolved infection aren’t widely available. It’s a different test than those for acute infection.I posted in another thread about how sick I was back in October/November - like 8 full weeks. Fever, non-stop coughing, 20 hours a day sleeping, couldn't breathe ...really thought I was going to die. The doctor never could figure out what it was - had x-rays for pneumonia - didn't have it. After 8 painful weeks and 2 rounds of antibiotics, steriods and steriod shots ...I finally kicked it. Took another month to feel really normal again. The only thing they could come up with was "it was some kind of serious upper respiratory infection."
Going in tomorrow for my regular check-in for A1C, and other tests (cholesterol, triglycerides) - now that we are hearing about the large number of "covid-19 similar" cases over the past few months I am anxious to see if I might have had it.
I did 2 rounds and it really messed with my A1C - went very high for me.So I just finished a 9 day course of prednisone today and I’m worried. I’m not sure how long it takes for my immune system to return to normal.
seems like the standard treatment approach to respiratory infections though ...right?This pisses me off. They gave the guy steroids which if you read reports is a major no no since it weakens immune system.
It seems to be. I had influenza which lead to a respiratory infection and hence steroids.seems like the standard treatment approach to respiratory infections though ...right?
"donate"Not sure if this was posted or not. Only thing moving faster than covid19 is this thread...
http://The New York Times: The Man With 17,700 Bottles of Hand Sanitizer Just Donated Them. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/15/technology/matt-colvin-hand-sanitizer-donation.html
I can’t answer that one as not a doctor but you may be right. Annoying that they say he has flu and treat like flu and they know it isn’t from testing and some of treatment may have been worse for him.seems like the standard treatment approach to respiratory infections though ...right?
This is what concerns me. South Korea is innovative, acted immediately from China's data and developed massive testing and drive-thru sites, and Asian countries as a whole are obedient and more society-based. China has a centralized one-party government that can act quickly and powerfully with massive numbers and resources. Us Americans, we are neither. We are almost too decentralized. And it is my right to eat this burger in this restaurant, gosh darnit!S. Korea was incredibly organized, had proper testing and cultural advantages(they follow directions), so no, we don't have the ability to pull off what South Korea did.
United States doesn't have testing on a mass scale yet, and culturally the majority of us don't trust the govt. The American bravado and our lack of preparedness make us more likely to be Italy than South Korea.
Unless we are being lied to, you couldn’t have had it in October as it’s first jump to humans was November-December in China.I posted in another thread about how sick I was back in October/November - like 8 full weeks. Fever, non-stop coughing, 20 hours a day sleeping, couldn't breathe ...really thought I was going to die. The doctor never could figure out what it was - had x-rays for pneumonia - didn't have it. After 8 painful weeks and 2 rounds of antibiotics, steriods and steriod shots ...I finally kicked it. Took another month to feel really normal again. The only thing they could come up with was "it was some kind of serious upper respiratory infection."
Going in tomorrow for my regular check-in for A1C, and other tests (cholesterol, triglycerides) - now that we are hearing about the large number of "covid-19 similar" cases over the past few months I am anxious to see if I might have had it.
yeah, not at all likely - good pointUnless we are being lied to, you couldn’t have had it in October as it’s first jump to humans was November-December in China.
I thought the first sentence explained that but I see now it was confusing and I should have made it a stand alone post.what does the Bourbon street partying last night have to do with preparedness?
You really want to be on Frenchmen St anyways....what does the Bourbon street partying last night have to do with preparedness?
Agreed.Yea this thread has definitely come through with some good info
This is where this thread gets tough to follow. It wasn't too many pages back where it was said that Italy was having a really tough time with the lock down because people were going on vacations/trips due to school closures. I mean Italy has been mentioned a ton for how bad a job they did but now you are saying that they did more than we have done?Italy actually locked down pretty quickly. They took far more measures earlier on than we have here.
That's what is so bad.
first responder here in Chicago. Gonna get interesting to say the least. At least I'm off the next two days. Seeing the St. Paddy's day bar crowds yesterday really pissed me off, glad JB did what he did today.Man I have no idea..... If I lived in LA, Bay Area, Seattle, Denver, Chicago, NYC, Boston etc then I'd be locked down fully.
Yup. I pay close attention to his posts.Agreed.
Lots of great posters here. One of many Shout outs should go to @Terminalxylem for providing some fantastic technical perspective on a lot of this.
Good thing we have an admin where official communications can be believed...From the NSC:
Text message rumors of a national #quarantine are FAKE. There is no national lockdown.
@CDCgov
has and will continue to post the latest guidance on #COVID19. #coronavirus
https://twitter.com/WHNSC/status/1239398218292748292?s=20
I read something a few days ago that discussed the timeline. I'll see if I can find it later when I get back home. But, the gist was that they locked down northern Italy relatively quickly and then the entire country shortly afterward. Now, I also read how not everyone took it seriously at first, but the initial government response was there.This is where this thread gets tough to follow. It wasn't too many pages back where it was said that Italy was having a really tough time with the lock down because people were going on vacations/trips due to school closures. I mean Italy has been mentioned a ton for how bad a job they did but now you are saying that they did more than we have done?
This will be situational, I think. The last two times I’ve shopped (late Wednesday night, early this morning), there have been few enough shoppers to make social distancing a snap. Mindful of fomites, I used plenty of hand sanitizer throughout both trips, including immediately before and after checkout.I personally think supply runs are risky as hell in areas that are likely to have open spread. That's why I advocated folks stocking up a month ago.
Fauci deserves to be paid like Bezos this month. Guy saved a lot of lives by guiding policy here.Good thing we have an admin where official communications can be believed...
Not going to cardiac rehab. Gold’s closed too. Will do all my work at home. Doctor visit last Thursday will be last for at least a monthWill cancel doc appt for Tues, keep my lab and port flush appt for Thurs, cancel colonoscopy for next Tuesday and keep appt with pcp next Thurs since not feeling well and hopefully she'll take over rxing my meds since the oncologist I love quit.
Did the cardiac rehab team give you what exercises to do at home?Not going to cardiac rehab. Gold’s closed too. Will do all my work at home. Doctor visit last Thursday will be last for at least a month
Yeah i was mostly doing increasing interval cardio on treadmill, bike and elliptical while monitoring heart rate. I will just do brisk walks with my dog and get back on the Peleton. Wearing my Apple Watch. Heart app has been very accurate so trust it.Did the cardiac rehab team give you what exercises to do at home?
Something to consider...Somewhat off topic....
After we are on the mend I would love to see some info on how much less fossil fuels were let out into the atmosphere. I think WFH can have a huuuge impact on our environmental crisis also.
Steroids are used in exacerbations of asthma and emphysema, and sometimes when wheezing is prominent in respiratory tract infections, usually bronchitis. They also are given out of desperation in ARDS, though there isn’t clear benefit, unless the underlying cause is a steroid-responsive process.seems like the standard treatment approach to respiratory infections though ...right?
Thanks. For an otc sleep aidI, I like Benadryl or unisom (diphenhydramine)The inhaler is probably albuterol. Need to read about the French justification for no NSAIDS, but agree to preferentially use acetaminophen for fever. Non-prescription sleep aids, with the exception of melatonin, stink.
First off, you don"t know Jack about what other people care about, so don't project crap about other people. The economics is an important aspect which must properly be taken into account to maximize the response. There is a huge human toll to pay in terms of stress, anxiety, depression, poverty, losing health care, crime, drug abuse, hunger that goes along with a big economic downturn. Going into a massive shutdown is not a sustainable strategy.You are ridiculous. Not that you are wrong but just that you don't care about anything other than money. No advice to give you, sorry that your life is so bad.
How do you know that only .000006 percent is infected? I don't think anyone knows. I've seen it said that if we have community transmitted cases, that means we have 1% infected. Still a low chance but much higher than if we just assume only the announced cases are the true infected population.First off, you don"t know Jack about what other people care about, so don't project crap about other people. The economics is an important aspect which must properly be taken into account to maximize the response. There is a huge human toll to pay in terms of stress, anxiety, depression, poverty, losing health care, crime, drug abuse, hunger that goes along with a big economic downturn. Going into a massive shutdown is not a sustainable strategy.
Currently we only have 0.000006 percent of the population infected. The chances of you getting the virus from going to a restaurant is lottery-like. This may not the best time to be rolling out such an economically costly tactic.
At this time more measured and targeted tactics are much more sustainable. A well-thought out strategy which an executable plan over the entire crisis is what is needed. Not a bunch of seat of the pants type of decision-making which will crash into a wall in a few weeks which because they are impossible to maintain.
Doxycycline is potent but can leave you groggyThanks. For an otc sleep aidI, I like Benadryl or unisom (diphenhydramine)
Currently we only have 0.000006 percent of the population infected. The chances of you getting the virus from going to a restaurant is lottery-like. This may not the best time to be rolling out such an economically costly tactic.
This is what we needed in January, but instead we had 15 cases, almost to zero and not to worry about it because of a hunch. Now we have to do what we have to do, but look at what UK is facing right now, we don’t want to be there. Or Italy. And we are heading that way.First off, you don"t know Jack about what other people care about, so don't project crap about other people. The economics is an important aspect which must properly be taken into account to maximize the response. There is a huge human toll to pay in terms of stress, anxiety, depression, poverty, losing health care, crime, drug abuse, hunger that goes along with a big economic downturn. Going into a massive shutdown is not a sustainable strategy.
Currently we only have 0.000006 percent of the population infected. The chances of you getting the virus from going to a restaurant is lottery-like. This may not the best time to be rolling out such an economically costly tactic.
At this time more measured and targeted tactics are much more sustainable. A well-thought out strategy which an executable plan over the entire crisis is what is needed. Not a bunch of seat of the pants type of decision-making which will crash into a wall in a few weeks which because they are impossible to maintain.
Two days ago it was wash your hands, use a mask, protect high risk people (but apparently didn't want to define who that were). Now it's "thin the herd for the economy"Hard one to wrap around, just shot up to worst poster on the board, not that he hadn't been trending that way for a long time
We have a handle on the magnitude simply by the number of deaths which are pretty well known. Could the number of infected by 2 to 3 times more, sure. Could it be 10 times more, I don't think that is possible.How do you know that only .000006 percent is infected? I don't think anyone knows. I've seen it said that if we have community transmitted cases, that means we have 1% infected. Still a low chance but much higher than if we just assume only the announced cases are the true infected population.
Stop completely lying about points. Someone made a point about the economic consequences of the death toll by not doing anything, and I countered it. I did not advocate any such policy. Quite being so Trump-like in more ways than just lying.Two days ago it was wash your hands, use a mask, protect high risk people (but apparently didn't want to define who that were). Now it's "thin the herd for the economy"
Duuude. Stop diggingStop completely lying about points. Someone made a point about the economic consequences of the death toll by not doing anything, and I countered it. I did not advocate any such policy. Quite being so Trump-like in more ways than just lying.
Our efforts should be on washing hands, wearing masks, producing tests, and protecting high-risk people. College students are not the danger crowd. Shutting down classes, cancelling games is not going to help. College kids are going to interact and be active regardless. Manage activities which expose high risk people.
So, I've struck out your suggestions that are not about what to do but about what shouldn't have to be done.
1. Washing hands - currently being emphasized, so not really assisting
2. Wearing masks - masks have been sold out and medical personnel may be running short. I believe masks currently are produced primarily in Asia (China). Even if they could be had in quantities for the American population, it will take time for them to get here (Do you wish to go deeper into this topic?) thus this is not practical now and offers no relief
3. Producing tests - Easy to say (Mike Pence said it recently, but since then no relief in the testing regimen) apparantly in progress, thus not really adding to the list of solutions
4. Protecting high risk people - this is the first new suggestion so let's look at that. What is high risk?
Data from Worldo'meters linked here
We can't really use the death rate all cases, particularly in the US since there is lack of testing. The only death rate on confirmed cases we have is for 80+ y.o. with is 48% higher than death rate on all cases. Let's say we assume 40% on top of all cases for 70+, 35% for 60+, 30% for 50+ etc that gives us death rates as follows:
80+ 21.9%, 70+ 11.2% 60+ 4.9% 50+ 1.7% 40+ 0.5% (this is with all comorbidities from the rest of the world baked in)
There are approximately 42 million people in the US aged 50-59 (about 1m fewer men than women), 37m 60-69 (1m fewer men than women), 22m 70-79 (2m more w than m), 12.5m 80+ (2.5m more w than m)
In addition, death rate is 50% higher for men than women
So who on the basis of the above numbers should we protect - who are the high risk people? How should we protect them? What does success at this protection look like? What cost is acceptable for this protection?
Where did I advocate "thin the herd for the economy" you big fat liar??Duuude. Stop digging