Yeah, but if you read the story, you get a bit of a different view than the headline.
"What it means in my mind, is that because we are screening the general population, we are catching people early in the infection before they start showing symptoms," Stefánsson said"
I think that's a significant point and one I made a few days ago when this was linked. The assumption I've always been under, because this is the assumption that the WHO made, is that most people that contract Covid-19 eventually end up showing some symptoms, whether mild or otherwise. I haven't really seen any data that shows whether this is the case or not. Even the little town of Vo had one study early on, but then they never followed up to see who all ended up showing some symptoms.
For you and I, this is probably no big deal as we've been following this a long time. But there are still some that think that a giant number of "asymptomatic cases" (defined by them as people who have covid-19 and never show any symptoms) might be out there and that really this virus isn't a big deal.
It's important to be accurate because if the "just a flu bro" thinking comes back, people may stop quarantining. That's the only reason I fight this everytime I see it come up. It's vitally important that people know that this is a very dangerous virus that kills 1-5% (possibly more) of people and that if governments let it run rampant, we'd literally see millions of deaths across the world and all hospitals would basically fall apart. You know that, I know that, but I'm convinced there are still a lot of people who don't believe that.